Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Server > Update Services > Re: MS09-043 - Revision of Updates

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: MS09-043 - Revision of Updates

 
 
PA Bear [MS MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-03-2009
[[ Right pew, wrong church. Forwarded to WSUS newsgroup
(microsoft.public.windows.server.update_services) via crosspost as a
convenience to OP.

On the web:
http://www.microsoft.com/communities...pdate_services

In your newsreader:
news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsof...pdate_services
]]


Mike Montgomery wrote:
> The WSUS servers in my env have 2 settings that relate to “Revisions of
> Updates” and both are enabled in our env -- configured under Options ->
> Automatic Approvals -> Advanced.
>
> 1.Automatically approve new revisions of updates that are already approved
> 2.Automatically decline updates when a new revision causes them to expire
>
> One of the KB's (KB947319) in MS09-043 was revised on 10/27/2009; however,
> if I look in Security Updates on my server, I see 2 versions of the KB.
>
> 1.The original from 8/11/2009 -- set to Install. Labelled as "This update
> is
> superseded by another update"
> 2.The update from 10/27/2009 - set to Not Approved. Labelled as "This
> update
> supersedes another update"
>
> Since the Aug version of the KB was set to install, I expected for
> "Automatic Revision of Updates" to set the Oct version to install, but
> this
> did not happen.
>
> 1.Do I have an incorrect understanding of the "Revision of Updates"
> settings?
> 2.If not, are others experiencing this same?


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Harry Johnston [MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-03-2009
Mike,

Supersedance is not the same thing as revision. This is expected behaviour.

In the majority of cases when an update has changed for some reason, a new
package is released which supersedes the old package. Packages are revised only
relatively infrequently, if you exclude package expiration.

Harry.

PA Bear [MS MVP] tells us that Mike Montgomery wrote:

>> The WSUS servers in my env have 2 settings that relate to “Revisions of
>> Updates” and both are enabled in our env -- configured under Options ->
>> Automatic Approvals -> Advanced.
>>
>> 1.Automatically approve new revisions of updates that are already
>> approved
>> 2.Automatically decline updates when a new revision causes them to expire
>>
>> One of the KB's (KB947319) in MS09-043 was revised on 10/27/2009;
>> however,
>> if I look in Security Updates on my server, I see 2 versions of the KB.
>>
>> 1.The original from 8/11/2009 -- set to Install. Labelled as "This
>> update is
>> superseded by another update"
>> 2.The update from 10/27/2009 - set to Not Approved. Labelled as "This
>> update
>> supersedes another update"
>>
>> Since the Aug version of the KB was set to install, I expected for
>> "Automatic Revision of Updates" to set the Oct version to install, but
>> this
>> did not happen.
>>
>> 1.Do I have an incorrect understanding of the "Revision of Updates"
>> settings?
>> 2.If not, are others experiencing this same?

>

 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MS09-043 - Revision of Updates Mike Montgomery Windows Update 2 11-03-2009 09:47 PM
Failed .NET Updates Derf McKensy Windows Update 6 11-03-2009 05:11 AM
WindowsUpdate_8024D00A WindowsUpdate_dt000 Michelle Windows Vista Performance 14 03-01-2008 10:42 AM
Updates Maggie Windows Vista Performance 1 02-23-2008 08:54 PM
Stop Error 0x0000007b Louis LeBrun Windows Vista Installation 17 07-05-2006 09:00 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59