Re: [News] Accusations Against IBM Seem Baseless; Is Microsoft Behind It Again?

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 11:40:23 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:

> "DFS" <nospam@dfs_.com> wrote in message
> news:1mMJj.14900$.. .
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>> Idiot. One minute you morons are claiming how clueless Microsoft is
>>> and how it's collapsing. The next minute Microsoft controls every
>>> government across the globe.
>>
>> heh! The lusers have been doing this for years.
>>
>> Left side of 'advocates' mouth: Microsoft is incompetent
>> Right side of 'advocates' mouth: Microsoft is holding Linux back
>>
>
> Only a complete moron and idiot like Roy Schestowitz would believe that
> Microsoft was somehow behind this ban. The linux loons aren't capable of
> looking at things logically but let's examine the situation here.

It's those rose colored glasses that come with each new membership in the
COLA Linux Loony Club.
The CLLC for short.

> It would take considerable influence and muscle to get the government to ban
> IBM from federal contracts. So why would Microsoft expend this influence
> just to ban IBM for 48 hours. What exactly did Microsoft gain from this? If
> Microsoft really did have this sort of power it would make sense to "save
> it" for something that really mattered.



> So Microsoft presumably gets the entire US Government to ban IBM. And
> what... does the Schestowitz retard think that IBM won't notice or that IBM
> doesn't have it's own influence to correct this? Is Roy Schestowitz really
> that stupid to believe that IBM is just going to sit there and not publicly
> disclose that Microsoft was behind this.
>
> What does IBM have to say about this? It's quite interesting that only the
> paid spamming idiot Roy Schestowitz has "evidence" that Microsoft was behind
> this. Clearly everyone at IBM is ignorant of this and doesn't even remotely
> blame Microsoft.

Roy Schestowitz claims to have evidence of everything from who really shot
JFK to Bigfoot.
He's a loony toon with a paid agenda.
Think of Schesotwitz as a lobbyist gone mentally unstable.


> So which is more likely... that MS would expended large amounts of influence
> and forced the entire government to ban IBM for 48 for absolutely zero gain
> and IBM itself isn't capable of seeing that Microsoft was behind this. Or
> that Roy Schestowitz is a first class idiot and moron and is so paranoid
> that he thinks Microsoft is behind everything in the world. Again... which
> is more likely?

Yet at the same time Roy Schestowitz is claiming Microsoft is going out of
business and on life support.

It's total lunacy.



--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/