Re: [News] Corel Encouraged to Embrace Open Source to Stay Relevant

On Thu, 22 May 2008 09:06:54 -0400, DFS wrote:

> Andrew Halliwell wrote:
>
>
>> How many machines registered as vista sales still run it?
>
>
> Approx. 23x as many as run Linux
>
> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=10#
> http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=8

And how many years has Linux been around?

Maybe 10+ years?

The question the Linux loons should be asking themselves is why people
would rather pay for Windows than use free Linux.

It's pretty sad when a product that is given away for free has so few
actual users.

You would think that after 10+ years, the Linux loons would get the
message.
--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Moshe. Goldfarb wrote:
> The question the Linux loons should be asking themselves is why people
> would rather pay for Windows than use free Linux.

"A sucker is born every minute and Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer will be
there to take advantage of him or her".

Are you a sucker, Mr Goldfarb?

Alias

Alias wrote:

> Moshe. Goldfarb wrote:
>
>> The question the Linux loons should be asking themselves is why people
>> would rather pay for Windows than use free Linux.
>
>
> "A sucker is born every minute and Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer will be
> there to take advantage of him or her".

hehehe...is that the best you can do you lying linux troll...making up
quotes!...LOL!
>
> Are you a sucker, Mr Goldfarb?

Are you that fukkin stupid alias?
Frank

Moshe. Goldfarb <> wrote:
> And how many years has Linux been around?
>
> Maybe 10+ years?

And how many billions of dollars have been spent on marketting it?
Hmmm?
How many of those billions were spent on illegal or otherwise immoral
"marketting"?

For linux, both those are as close to 0 as makes no odds.

Gods, you're stupid.
--
| | |
| Andrew Halliwell BSc | "The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't |
| in | suck is probably the day they start making |
| Computer science | vacuum cleaners" - Ernst Jan Plugge |

On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:21:32 +0100, Andrew Halliwell wrote:

> Moshe. Goldfarb <> wrote:
>> And how many years has Linux been around?
>>
>> Maybe 10+ years?
>
> And how many billions of dollars have been spent on marketting it?
> Hmmm?
> How many of those billions were spent on illegal or otherwise immoral
> "marketting"?

Market it?
You can't even give it away!

Redhat sure tried to market Linux desktop and they gave up.
Why?
Few people have an interest in it.

> For linux, both those are as close to 0 as makes no odds.
>
> Gods, you're stupid.

Looks like you're the ignorant one.
Good self nuke.


--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

In article <1tm8z49z3bsyj.1i8sp9tyf4ely$.>,
Moshe Goldfarb. <> wrote:
>
>Redhat sure tried to market Linux desktop and they gave up.
>Why? Few people have an interest in it.
>

Redhat doesn't sell "the linux desktop". Redhat sells support.
They stopped marketing the desktop because there's no way to sell support
if the product doesn't need much and what it does need is available via
the internet.

Followups to dumb.linux.trolls.

On Sun, 01 Jun 2008 11:12:51 -0400, Moshe Goldfarb. wrote:

> On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:21:32 +0100, Andrew Halliwell wrote:
>
>> Moshe. Goldfarb <> wrote:
>>> And how many years has Linux been around?
>>>
>>> Maybe 10+ years?
>>
>> And how many billions of dollars have been spent on marketting it?
>> Hmmm?
>> How many of those billions were spent on illegal or otherwise immoral
>> "marketting"?
>
> Market it?
> You can't even give it away!
>
> Redhat sure tried to market Linux desktop and they gave up. Why?
> Few people have an interest in it.

You might want to inform Red Hat that they aren't selling a desktop
product. I am sure they will be surprised.

>
>> For linux, both those are as close to 0 as makes no odds.
>>
>> Gods, you're stupid.
>
> Looks like you're the ignorant one.
> Good self nuke.

Maybe you should buy a can of honesty.

--
Rick

> And how many billions of dollars have been spent on marketting it?
> Hmmm?
> How many of those billions were spent on illegal or otherwise immoral
> "marketting"?

Oh brother ..
how about illegal and immoral newsgroup posts?
live by it? .. die by it ... what goes around just came around .. duck



heh ..

Wishing it were so does not make it so ..
So? .. what now?


Rich