dennis@home (a typical Vista luser) wrote:
>
> "Non scrivetemi" <> wrote in
> message news: tonsmith.info...
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>>=20
>>> "Peter K=C3=B6hlmann" <> wrote in message=20
>>> news:fe0va1$gc0$00$...
>>>=20
>>> > He hasn't understood any of those posts answering him
>>>=20
>>> You haven't for certain.
>>>=20
>>> > He is also unable to understand even simplistic explanations about the
>>> > workings of MD5, still coming to the completely wrong conclusions.
>>>=20
>>> How is a simplistic explanation going to help?
>>
>> In your case, it obviously doesn't. Our mistake for assuming you were
>> at least as intelligent as a garden slug.
>>
>>> It looks like its down to faith..
>>
>> No dummy, it's down to mathematics. Which you've demonstrated a
>> complete lack of any ability to grasp even when it's dumbed down to
>> simple division.
>
> Yes you have something correct.. it is down to maths.
> Now if you have any maths that shows how md5 works let us know.
Still bullshitting, you cretin? It is extremely easy to find how MD5 works.
It is no secret at all.
The sites *you* yourself have linked to even have shown that your scenario
does not work. You are just too stupid to understand what is plainly
written there.
You were given links to show how "collision attacks" and "pre-image attacks"
work. Explained there by the very people who found the vulnerabilities. All
you did then was playing dumb and shouting "I still think that it is
possible".
> Otherwise go back to being slug food.
You are really a Vista user. Gods, are you stupid
--
Microsoft: The company that made email dangerous
And web browsing. And viewing pictures. And...
|