"Alias" <> wrote in message
news:gm3vsa$d43$...
> ©arl wrote:
>>
>> "The C." <GFY.ALIAS&DEET@alias&deetarepesant.com> wrote in message
>> news:559FE2D8-4408-4767-BCBE-...
>>> Another jealous one! Do you know Alias?? Peasant fool.
>>> --
>>> Computer/Software Novice
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "And In The End... The Love You Take, Is Equal To The Love You Make"
>>>
>>>
>>> "Fibonacci number" wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is it perhaps because Vista is the worst MODERN OS (compared to XP,
>>>> UBUNTU, MACOSX and WIN7 - even though its still beta??)
>>>>
>>>> Is it the FACT that windows7 beta works FAR BETTER than Vista SP1 even
>>>> though its still a beta? LOL
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft BLUNDERED so badly with vista that people all over the world
>>>> cant wait for the time TO GET RID OF THE FRIKIN OS!
>>>>
>>>> Only a MORON would say that vista is the best OS currently available.
>>>> And we all know who that moron is - FRANK, our geriatric TROLL! lol
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.releasewindows7.com/
>>>>
>>>> Windows 7 Beta has been getting good reviews since its release and many
>>>> users who use the beta say this is going to be one of the finest
>>>> releases so far from Microsoft after the dreadful Vista start. Agreeing
>>>> we all like Windows 7, how soon you want Windows 7 to be shipped?
>>>>
>>>> Kelly Poe, a big fan of Windows 7 has started a campaign to release
>>>> Windows 7 Now! The campaign is called - Release Windows 7 Now - and
>>>> allows users to cast their vote towards the release.
>>>>
>>>> Based on the positive reviews from many people like Leo Laporte
>>>> (twit.tv, TWIT Podcast) and Paul Thurrott (www.winsupersite.com,
>>>> Windows
>>>> Weekly podcast), Poe thinks that Windows 7 is good enough for a release
>>>> already and requests Microsoft let the beautiful little birdy fly!
>>>>
>>>> Microsoft has already confirmed today that there is no more beta and
>>>> published RC details, but still it is not sure what versions of Windows
>>>> 7 Microsoft has planned to release. I think we would get a better
>>>> picture once RC gets released.
>>
>>
>> windows 7 is supposed to be upto 40% faster
>> but is it worth spending another £200 .. I doubt it
>> MS will bring out the patches to catch Vista up in no time
>> plus I can hardly call my machine slow anyways
>
> Win 7 is indeed much faster and can be installed on older machines. I
> installed the BETA on a machine with an nVidia 256 MB 6200 card, a 2Ghz
> AMD processor with 1.5 GB of 333 RAM, not exactly a high end machine and
> Win 7 was just as fast, perhaps faster, than XP on the same machine.
>
this maybe so, and whilst its free I would say yeah
but when the official release comes around and they start charging is the
time to decide
I paid £200 less than a year ago for Vista Ultimate .. Should I be expected
to pay another £200 this year?
I just dont have that sort of cash .. Yeah!! if I build a new machine then I
could absorb it, but at present theres nothing wrong with mine
--
©arl
306 Web Design Templates for just $15
http://www.306templates.com
..