MS Don't have the answer yet - the paper is due soon.
--
Mark Parris
MCSE: NT4.0, 2000, 2003
MCITP: EA, SA
Founder: [ADUG] UK Active Directory User Group
http://adug.co.uk
"Danny Sanders" <> wrote in message
news:8E895DF3-F6F5-49CF-9B0F-...
> >I guess my question really is, to what limit has MS tested? What would
>>the impact be from putting millions of links in a DB DFS root?
>
> I'm guessing you are going where no man has gone before. You probably
> won't find your answer here, you may have to place a call to MS on this
> one.
>
> hth
> DDS
>
>
> "Louis" <> wrote in message
> news:a70d85fe-8661-4650-a792-...
> On Mar 19, 2:52 pm, "Isaac Oben [MCITP,MCSE]"
> <isaac.o...@nospam.gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello Louis,
>>
>> I will think the feasible number to support will depend mostly on your
>> network speed in data transfer and your available resources.
>> --
>> Isaac Oben [MCTIP:EA, MCSE]"Louis" <louis.el...@gmail.com> wrote in
>> message
>>
>> news:9f42775b-6981-44c5-93f4-...
>>
>>
>>
>> > Hello,
>>
>> > I have a customer that could benefit greatly using DFS to break up an
>> > unmanagable volume. However, this would require 6+ million links in
>> > the initial namespace. With 2K8 MS says it lifts the 5000 link limit
>> > for domain based roots. In practice, though, what is truly a feasible
>> > number to support?
>>
>> > Thanks,
>> > Louis- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> I guess my question really is, to what limit has MS tested? What would
> the impact be from putting millions of links in a DB DFS root?
>
> Thanks,
> Louis