phrogee "contributed" in alt.os.windows-xp:
>
> "sbb78247" <> wrote in message
> news:. nl...
>> Dozzer wrote:
>>> Guenther Sohler wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:22:57 -0800, Dozzer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Guenther Sohler wrote:
>>>>>> 56 GB works, 120 GB does not work, 160 GB does not work
>>>>>
>>>>> How old is your Motherboard? That seem to fall more in-line with
>>>>> Motherboard/BIOS restrictions.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My Motherboard is K7S5A.
>>>
>>> Released January 2006. It's fairly new, so it's not affecting the
>>> size of disk.
>>>
>>
>> no ****
>>
>>>>
>>>> Why can the age of the motherboard can make a difference ?
>>>> How does it interact with the installation of windows ?
>>>
>>> Motherboards have gone through several iterations of Disk capacity
>>> support; 2GB, then 4GB, through today's 48-bit Addressing.
>>
>> no **** - anything else captain obvious?
>>
>
> That's Mr. Obvious, you twisted twit!
>
>
>
Abuse report sent to
Reason: It is strictly forbidden to
swear to the regs or calling them twisted twits. Kiss your internet
connection goodbye, you twisted twit.
--
Your mother was a smarmy tart who lost her head on a rusty cargo ship
somewhere off South America.