Re: [Rival] Microsoft Reveals the REAL Cost of Windows: $4,000

On Sep 8, 8:38 am, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@schestowitz.com> wrote:
> Microsoft starts a "Get the Facts" campaign...against itself
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | Imagine the kind of savings you could get if you just stopped using Windows
> | altogether! Few to no security issues. Less administration. Etc.
> |
> | By the way, the study claims that switching to Vista saves on hardware costs.
> | How could this possibly be, when everything I have ever read on Vista is that
> | it is a resource hog? You spend more on hardware with Vista, not less.
> |
> | Anyway, Microsoft must really be hurting if it has to resort to beating up on
> | its most stable product in years. It's clearly desperate to get people to
> | move off XP (you know, the Windows OS that actually has hardware/peripheral
> | support, a lot of software written for it, needs a lighter hardware platform,
> | etc.). Maybe the open-source crowd should just wait for Microsoft to beat
> | itself into oblivion.
> `----
>
> http://blogs.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-9...=rss&tag=feed&...
>
> Still going with the "Big Lie":
>
> http://img67.imageshack.us/img67/489/loldx3.jpg
>
> Related:
>
> ,----[ Quotes with annotation ]
> | "(Microsoft manager I don't like the fact that the report show us losing
> | on TCO on webservers. I don't like the fact that the report show us losing
> | on availability (windows was down more than linux). And I don't like the
> | fact that the reports says nothing new is coming with windows .net server."
> |
> | [...]
> |
> | "I don't like it to be public on the doc that we sponsored it because I
> | don't think the outcome is as favorable as we had hoped. I just don't like
> | competitors using it as ammo against us. It is easier if it doesn't mention
> | that we sponsored it."
> `----
>
> http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowa...1607/9000/PX09...

You are out of your mind.
In fact you're out of all of your minds.

Still uding blogs as sources for your tripe I see.

Goodness you Linux people seem to be worried about Microsoft.
In fact most of your *advocacy* posts are about Microsoft.

Odd.
Very odd indeed

On Sep 8, 12:24 pm, Peter Kai Jensen <use...@pekajemaps.homeip.net>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> dont.pull...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > Odd.
> > Very odd indeed
>
> What's odd is that you cross-posted to totally unrelated groups and hide
> behind an open proxy and a throwaway email account. No wait, that's not
> odd ... You *are* a worthless troll, after all.

Let me see if I have this right.
The SPAMMER BOI Roy Schestowitz is posting an article about Microsoft
charging $4,000, in a LINUX group and you are bothering me for
reposting it in a WINDOWS group?

That's what I like about you Linux freaks, you even wear your blinders
to bed so you can't see the outside world at all.

Go back to trying to make Adobe Premier work with Linux.
Fully and the latest version please.

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questi....php?p=2882397

BTW next time try talking about the topic instead of going off on a
totally lame tangent.