Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > Re: Skirmish with .NET Framework versions 2.0, 3.0, 3.5 following update to SP1

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: Skirmish with .NET Framework versions 2.0, 3.0, 3.5 following update to SP1

 
 
Ken Blake, MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-18-2009
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:00:36 +0100, "Doug"
<> wrote:


> Off topic, when I took my box in to the manufacturer to have an extra 2GB
> fitted to make 4GB, I was surprised when I got it home to find the
> technician had removed the swap file. After trying it with a fixed swap file
> of around 9GB and reading up about it, I decided that opinion was evenly
> divided and that he was probably right.




He was not right.


> The space is welcome, the disc
> thrashing reduced, everything seems faster, and PerfectDisk has less
> defragging to do.



There's no reason to have a fixed size. There's no advantage to not
having a page file, and often a disadvantage.

1. If you don't have a page file, you can't use all the RAM you have.
That's because Windows preallocates virtual memory in anticipation of
a possible need for it, even though that allocated virtual memory may
never be used. Without a page file, that allocation has to be made in
real memory, thus tying up that memory and preventing it from being
used for any purpose.

2. There is never a benefit in not having a page file. If it isn't
needed, it won't be used. Don't confuse allocated memory with used
memory.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Doug
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-19-2009
"Ken Blake, MVP" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:00:36 +0100, "Doug"
> <> wrote:
>
>> Off topic, when I took my box in to the manufacturer to have an extra 2GB
>> fitted to make 4GB, I was surprised when I got it home to find the
>> technician had removed the swap file. After trying it with a fixed swap
>> file
>> of around 9GB and reading up about it, I decided that opinion was evenly
>> divided and that he was probably right.

>
> He was not right.
>
>> The space is welcome, the disc
>> thrashing reduced, everything seems faster, and PerfectDisk has less
>> defragging to do.

>
> There's no reason to have a fixed size. There's no advantage to not
> having a page file, and often a disadvantage.
>
> 1. If you don't have a page file, you can't use all the RAM you have.
> That's because Windows preallocates virtual memory in anticipation of
> a possible need for it, even though that allocated virtual memory may
> never be used. Without a page file, that allocation has to be made in
> real memory, thus tying up that memory and preventing it from being
> used for any purpose.
>
> 2. There is never a benefit in not having a page file. If it isn't
> needed, it won't be used. Don't confuse allocated memory with used
> memory.
> --
> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
> Please Reply to the Newsgroup


Thanks, Ken, I shall certainly give this further attention.
Doug


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4169 (20090619) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com



 
Reply With Quote
 
Ken Blake, MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-19-2009
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:19:19 +0100, "Doug"
<> wrote:

> "Ken Blake, MVP" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> > On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:00:36 +0100, "Doug"
> > <> wrote:
> >
> >> Off topic, when I took my box in to the manufacturer to have an extra 2GB
> >> fitted to make 4GB, I was surprised when I got it home to find the
> >> technician had removed the swap file. After trying it with a fixed swap
> >> file
> >> of around 9GB and reading up about it, I decided that opinion was evenly
> >> divided and that he was probably right.

> >
> > He was not right.
> >
> >> The space is welcome, the disc
> >> thrashing reduced, everything seems faster, and PerfectDisk has less
> >> defragging to do.

> >
> > There's no reason to have a fixed size. There's no advantage to not
> > having a page file, and often a disadvantage.
> >
> > 1. If you don't have a page file, you can't use all the RAM you have.
> > That's because Windows preallocates virtual memory in anticipation of
> > a possible need for it, even though that allocated virtual memory may
> > never be used. Without a page file, that allocation has to be made in
> > real memory, thus tying up that memory and preventing it from being
> > used for any purpose.
> >
> > 2. There is never a benefit in not having a page file. If it isn't
> > needed, it won't be used. Don't confuse allocated memory with used
> > memory.
> > --
> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup

>
> Thanks, Ken, I shall certainly give this further attention.



You're welcome. Glad to help.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Skirmish with .NET Framework versions 2.0, 3.0, 3.5 following update to SP1 Mike Windows Vista General Discussion 1 06-18-2009 03:42 PM
Can I safely delete old versions of net framework , SP1 and SP2 Silvie Windows Update 6 08-10-2008 09:42 PM
Do I NEED ALL .net framework versions? Silverfox1 Windows Update 9 01-07-2008 09:17 PM
.Net Framework Versions Update Issues Sherry Windows Vista General Discussion 3 11-30-2007 07:59 PM
Cannot install newer versions of .net framework Aleodor Windows Update 1 05-14-2006 06:35 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59