"Ken Blake, MVP" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:00:36 +0100, "Doug"
> <> wrote:
>
>> Off topic, when I took my box in to the manufacturer to have an extra 2GB
>> fitted to make 4GB, I was surprised when I got it home to find the
>> technician had removed the swap file. After trying it with a fixed swap
>> file
>> of around 9GB and reading up about it, I decided that opinion was evenly
>> divided and that he was probably right.
>
> He was not right.
>
>> The space is welcome, the disc
>> thrashing reduced, everything seems faster, and PerfectDisk has less
>> defragging to do.
>
> There's no reason to have a fixed size. There's no advantage to not
> having a page file, and often a disadvantage.
>
> 1. If you don't have a page file, you can't use all the RAM you have.
> That's because Windows preallocates virtual memory in anticipation of
> a possible need for it, even though that allocated virtual memory may
> never be used. Without a page file, that allocation has to be made in
> real memory, thus tying up that memory and preventing it from being
> used for any purpose.
>
> 2. There is never a benefit in not having a page file. If it isn't
> needed, it won't be used. Don't confuse allocated memory with used
> memory.
> --
> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
> Please Reply to the Newsgroup
Thanks, Ken, I shall certainly give this further attention.
Doug
__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4169 (20090619) __________
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com