Thanks for the plain text. It is much more readable in news group readers.
As far as HTML goes - what pleases you may not please others, even with your
email!
--
Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP
Windows Desktop Experience
"MKR" <m-> wrote in message
news:Ob3smv$...
> Ok, made that mistake. Of course I meant 4GB.
> I also changed to plain text, Sorry about this.
>
> Otherwise, the hope is for W7 in October. I ordered it. Will probaby
> install the 64-bit version.
>
>
> "Richard Urban" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> 4 MB of RAM was common in 1994.
>
> Today many have 4 GB of RAM, or more!
>
> <grin>
>
> --
>
> Richard Urban
> Microsoft MVP
> Windows Desktop Experience
>
>
> "MKR" <m-> wrote in message
> news:...
> I am surprised that you say this. Should it not work?
> "Eric" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> I'm very surprised you got it to run at all with 4MB of RAM.
> "MKR" <m-> wrote in message
> news:...
> Whatever, I did to accelerate the start up of Vista did not help at all.
> Whether killing services, ditching the sidebar, cleaning up etc. etc. the
> startup still takes up to two minutes. As opposed to it, the shutdown
> takes only 10 secs. I really do not understand what is wrong with the
> start up. As an example, today the usual security updates etc. from MS
> installed which required a restart. From the moment the restart started
> (shutdown finished in 10 secs) to full availability of the desktop, it
> took more than 3 minutes. This is ridiculous. My laptop has 4MB of RAM and
> a 2.0 GHz AMD CPU. I think that should be enough to make it faster.
>
> I hope Windows 7 resolves that issue.
|