Re: Speech Recognition, just a toy for most of us

"andy t" <> wrote in message news:...
> "andy t" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> "Mark Conrad" <none-> wrote in message
>> news:270220091945302827%none- wrote>

> You are a ****ed-up idiot troll.

WOW! I come back after a few days away and I see you took my advice after
all in only using four letter words to six letter words though I did not
quite expect THOSE kind of four letter words, what a talented man you are
LOL!

The truth hurts and I think I hit a nerve judging by the above! Now we are
seeing the real Mr. mark con man

Nice work above, what an improvement, now come on Mr. Slippery the burning
question is did you type that or did you train your $1600 DNS Medical to
dictate that, my guess is both.

Just goes to show, it does not matter how many microphones you buy with your
welfare check, if your DNS Medical cannot spell and neither can you what's
the point?

I advised you did I not, your welfare check would be better placed for use
in a college for people like you with learning difficulties such as
English.

They must love it when you come in with your welfare check each month to
spend on equipment that is far too difficult for you to comprehend. Makes
you feel important does it? Never mind, you aren't. I bet they believe it
is just like taking candy from a baby. (A baby illiterate troll).

I suggest the first thing you do, is buy a decent dictionary and not a toy
one like "Merriam Webster's".

> Okay I apologize for *NOT* posting that you should have worn your ****ing
> seat belt so you would not be
> paralyzed now.

I was wearing it actually.

Just love it above, just goes to prove when someone like this uneducated
specimen cannot win an argument he has to resort to language like that.

I am glad I exposed you for everybody out there to see and it was my
pleasure you egotistical, uneducated, overgrown spunk bubble.

BTW, good work above in recognizing "paralyzed can be spelt with a "Z" but
it can also be spelt with an "S" except with a "Z" we are be led to believe
is the U.S. version of that spelling and the alternative is not even in
Webster's dictionary proving it is nothing more than a toy dictionary!

> I apologize for you *NOT* posting that you should have picked
> your friends more carefully before you decided to be a
> passenger in their automobile.

I was driving actually and I was the only one in the car but hey, better to
have loved and lost than never had in the first place.

> I apologize for *NOT* posting that there is little hope
> for you to turn into a logical human.

Everything I have exposed about you is perfectly logical, in fact 100%
logical because you cannot get out of your predicament! (or your English
grammar/spelling mistakes).

> I apologize for *NOT* posting that the main part of
> your body that is paralyzed is your brain.

You already said that in an earlier post proving once and for all your
dementia is REAL!

I see this post is made up of mainly little words and four of his paragraphs
start off the same with "I apologise for *NOT*" making it easier to cut and
paste those repetitive words into his post. There is less chance for this
jerk to show his illiteracy that way

Now under scrutiny I believe you may want to rethink your comment above a
little teensy weensy bit better than that.

For I already know my body is paralysed but I know my brain is a lot
bigger than yours.

If my brain is paralysed then what does that make yours?

To prove my point, I believe we need to recap on your past masterpieces with
what you have taught DNS Medical to be in its vocabulary over the past 10
years and claiming it to be the number 1 speech app now that we know it CAN
perform spelling mistakes contrary to what your best friend John Doe says.

1. Spelling mistakes: -

consistantly, occassionally, grammer, mistakingly, lemme, dunno, embarassed,
whatta, vitrolic, utterances poo-poo and my favourite of all - *DISPITE* in
capitals
for all the WWW to see, LOL!

2. Definitions, context and sheer illiteracy!

Poo-poo/pooh-pooh, memorial phrase/memorable phrase, slogan.

I mean really, how you have the audacity to stick around when you have shown
EVERYBODY on the WWW that you or your $1600 DNS Medical cannot even get a
seven letter word like *DESPITE* correct especially while expecting
everybody to take you seriously in something as complicated as the
microphone department trying to prove you are a microphone expert just
because you are playing doctors and nurses in a hospital. You are retired
alright, retired from reality! LOL!

Hmm.. Wonder what he did before he retired, methinks it could be a janitor
or something along those lines and now this is the only way he can get
attention drawn towards him fuelling his need for self importance.

I noticed once again you mention *occasionally I make spelling mistakes*,
there is no occasionally about it just look at the many above and you are
still trying to wriggle out of this by backtracking and saying you never
used DNS Medical to dictate those posts of yours, you know the repetitive
ones with Mary Poppins and your girlfriend the female astronaut because once
again I repeat, you DO NOT say ANYWHERE in your posts that you are NOT using
your DNS Medical to dictate.

As we all know now, John Doe was wrong and speech recognition programmes can
misspell words, the onus is upon the person owning that software to make
sure the wrong spelling of a word cannot be dictated ever again buy dumping
it.

You still have not proved to the WWW that you DID NOT use speech recognition
which misspelt all of those words above I mention and that is without
checking your latest tirade. BTW, where did you cut and paste that one from
you FRAUD!

Let us look at your so called evidence. Your mate John Doe wrote (BTW, how
much did you pay him to say this?) : -

> Again... Andy... you are flailing about something you misunderstand.
> Mark Conrad does not use speech recognition for his USENET posts,
> that is why he spelled "consistently" wrong. And as I told you
> before, speech recognition cannot misspell words since it chooses
>from a list of words.

John seems to think I misunderstand and he adamantly professes that you do
not use speech recognition for your Usenet posts as stated above clearly.

In that case tell me this, how the hell can he know how you put those words
on to the screen unless he was right there with you watching you doing
it?

Seeing as he is one of your dancing partners you will be telling me next he
was. In fact I would not be surprised if he was probably ****ing you with
his cock so far up your ass that your false teeth fall out.

Once again Mr. Slippery, trying to wriggle out of this one would be
difficult even for Harry Houdini, so you have no chance because you and your
DNS Medical have been exposed for all the WWW to see!

Another thing, do not pretend that there are lots of people in Usenet that
are bothered about me, you mean the one person that is John Doe, another of
your double ups! I am just exposing you as the fraud you really are!

If a post comes out in my domain and I see it especially when it mentions my
name, I will retaliate so get it into your head you illiterate thick
imbecile, think before you retaliate because I just love pulling your posts
apart.

> Both DNS and WSR have trouble with "near" homonyms, they
> basically can't tell the differences between:

> an and in and end

I will agree with you some words such as the above but not with all, not if
you word wrap the word you want to use within a specially taught macro and
link it with a certain definition, I know, I have done this with poo-poo and
pooh-pooh so once again Johnny boy, you are incorrect to an extent on this
issue also.

> I think I am getting the hang of your idea of logic,
> how am I doing?

Not very well I am afraid and I thought there would be a marked improvement
in your English when I came back
from my break but you are still the sad old illiterate with not many marbles
left trying to prove a point.

All you are doing is stalling the inevitable and that you are still trying
to divert along with your partner in crime that you and your DNS Medical
could have and probably did (noticing by your response and the nerves that I
hit) make schoolboy spelling errors.

There is just a couple of untruths you spouted that needs to be put right by
me.

Firstly,

And now my apology to you. (You did not think I would really let you off the
hook with your unspeakable rapture above did you?).

I apologise for your mother *NOT* drowning you at birth because you were the
runt of the litter.

I apologise for your mother *NOT* being able to give you a proper education
which inevitably made you illiterate.

I apologise for you *NOT* being able to shrug off your inferiority complex.

I apologise for you *NOT* to be any use to man nor beast.

Hey, this cut and pasting lark is easy, makes life much easier. So this is
what your $1600 was used for LOL!

"andy t" <> wrote:
> "Mark Conrad" <none-> wrote

....

> I advised you did I not, your welfare check would be better placed
> for use in a college for people like you with learning
> difficulties such as English.

No one learns difficulties, Andy, and English is not a learning
difficulty. More correct might be "With such difficulties as
learning English." Here on USENET, harping on language usage is
distasteful. If you want to give English lessons, Andy, try
(alt.usage.english).

> I suggest the first thing you do, is buy a decent dictionary and
> not a toy one like "Merriam Webster's".

And the beat goes on... another target of ridicule.

> BTW, good work above in recognizing "paralyzed can be spelt with a
> "Z"

In United States English, paralyzed is spelled with a "z".

> "but it can also be spelt with an "S" except with a "Z" we are be
> led to believe is the U.S. version of that spelling and the
> alternative is not even in Webster's dictionary proving it is
> nothing more than a toy dictionary!

British English is different than United States English, Andy.

>> I apologize for *NOT* posting that the main part of your body
>> that is paralyzed is your brain.

Andy is paralyzed from the neck up.

> You already said that in an earlier post proving once and for all
> your dementia

alt.psychology

> still trying to wriggle out of this by backtracking and saying you
> never used DNS Medical to dictate those posts of yours,

Apparently you never consider "motive" or "evidence", Andy.

> once again I repeat, you DO NOT say ANYWHERE in your posts that
> you are NOT using your DNS Medical to dictate.

That is false, not that it matters.

> As we all know now, John Doe was wrong and speech recognition
> programmes can misspell words,

And the cow jumped over the moon.

> Your mate John Doe wrote (BTW, how much did you pay him to say
> this?) : -

As much as everyone else gets paid to post here.

> In that case tell me this, how the hell can he know how you put
> those words on to the screen unless he was right there with you
> watching you doing it?

1. Mark Conrad said he was not using speech recognition for these
posts.
2. Speech recognition does not make spelling errors because it
always chooses from a list of words.

> Another thing, do not pretend that there are lots of people in
> Usenet that are bothered about me, you mean the one person that is
> John Doe,

Don't let it bother you, Andy.

> another of your double ups!

There are no spelling errors in my posts, Andy, using the same
software.

> If a post comes out in my domain and I see it especially when it
> mentions my name, I will retaliate so get it into your head you
> illiterate thick imbecile, think before you retaliate because I
> just love pulling your posts apart.

Welcome to USENET, Andy, knock yourself out.

Nice try to divert things from your obvious illiteracy but I believe you
should have wrote something like: -

I consistantly keep spelling incorrectly and there is no "occassionally"
about it. This is not the only area I am illiterate in.

I am also embarassed about my grammer as well dispite trying my best not to
make a fool of myself I mistakingly keep doing so.

BTW do not poo-poo anything I dictate even though the word poo-poo isn't
even in the dictionary I use.

lemme tell you although my vitrolic posts I feel are just, they really show
whatta dork I really am and I dunno how to use the English language properly
so forgive my utterances for I have no memorial phrase to use as my slogan
except to say I blame it on my dementia!

Those words spelt incorrectly above are all either dictated directly from my
DNS Medical or from my brain!

Mark Conrad. (Or could it be John Doe?)


andy t

"Mark Conrad" <none-> wrote in message
news:080320090006136809%none-...
> In article <0Cusl.19461$>, John Doe
> <> wrote:
>
>> > If a post comes out in my domain and I see it especially when it
>> > mentions my name, I will retaliate so get it into your head you
>> > illiterate thick imbecile, think before you retaliate because I
>> > just love pulling your posts apart.
>>
>> Welcome to USENET, Andy, knock yourself out.
>
> Uh, eye thinke et es juust a case uf Andy neds 2 git layed.
>
> Ther es a drug made fer parafalegicks thet maks them thinke
> thay ben layed, lemme c if I can git the nam uf thet drug.
>
> Wunce Andy gits layed, he wil b a nuw man, mark mye wurds.
>
> Andy, sorri bout my spellin, eye am wurkin on ut.
>
> Mark-

> "andy t" <> wrote in message news:...
> news:...
>> "Mark Conrad" <none-> wrote in message
>> news:270220091945302827%none- wrote>

> You are a ****ed-up idiot troll.

I think I hit a nerve! LOL!

WOW! I come back after a few days away and I see you took my advice after
all in only using four letter words to six letter words though I did not
quite expect THOSE kind of four letter words, what a talented man you are
LOL!

The truth hurts and I think I hit a nerve judging by the above!
Now we are seeing the real Mr. mark con man

Nice work above, what an improvement, now come on Mr. Slippery the burning
question is did you type that or did you train your $1600 DNS Medical to
dictate that, my guess is both.

Just goes to show, it does not matter how many microphones you buy with
your welfare check, if your DNS Medical cannot spell and neither can you
what's the point?

I advised you did I not, your welfare check would be better placed for use
in a college for people like you with learning difficulties such as
English.

They must love it when you come in with your welfare check each month to
spend on equipment that is far too difficult for you to comprehend. Makes
you feel important does it? Never mind, you aren't. I bet they believe
it is just like taking candy from a baby. (A baby illiterate troll).

I suggest the first thing you do, is buy a decent dictionary and not a toy
one like "Webster's".

> Okay I apologize for *NOT* posting that you should have worn your ****ing
> seat belt so you would not be
> paralyzed now.

I was wearing it actually.

Just love it above, just goes to prove when someone like this uneducated
specimen cannot win an argument he has to resort to language like that.

I am glad I exposed you for everybody out there to see and it was my
pleasure you egotistical, uneducated, overgrown spunk bubble.

BTW, good work above in recognizing "paralyzed" can be spelt with a "Z"
but it can also be spelt with an "S" except with a "Z" we are be led to
believe is the U.S. version of that spelling and the alternative is not
even in Webster's dictionary proving it is nothing more than a toy
dictionary!

> I apologize for you *NOT* posting that you should have picked
> your friends more carefully before you decided to be a
> passenger in their automobile.

I was driving actually and I was the only one in the car but hey, better
to have loved and lost than never had in the first place.

> I apologize for *NOT* posting that there is little hope
> for you to turn into a logical human.

Everything I have exposed about you is perfectly logical, in fact 100%
logical because you cannot get out of your predicament! (or your English
grammar/spelling mistakes).

> I apologize for *NOT* posting that the main part of
> your body that is paralyzed is your brain.

You already said that in an earlier post proving once and for all your
dementia is REAL and getting worse by the sound of it!

I see this post is made up of mainly little words and four of his
paragraphs start off the same with "I apologise for *NOT*"
making it easier to cut and paste those repetitive words into his
post. There is less chance for this jerk to show his illiteracy
that way.

Now under scrutiny I believe you may want to rethink your comment above a
little teensy weensy bit better than that.

For I already know my body is paralysed but I know my brain is a lot
bigger than yours.

If my brain is paralysed then what does that make yours?

To prove my point, I believe we need to recap on your past masterpieces
with what you have taught DNS Medical to be in its vocabulary over
the past 10 years and claiming it to be the number 1 speech app now that
we know it CAN perform spelling mistakes contrary to what your best
friend John Doe says.

1. Spelling mistakes: -

consistantly, occassionally, grammer, mistakingly, lemme, dunno,
embarassed, whatta, vitrolic, utterances poo-poo and my
favourite of all - *DISPITE* in capitals for all the WWW to see,
LOL!

2. Definitions, context and sheer illiteracy!

Poo-poo/pooh-pooh, memorial phrase/memorable phrase, slogan.

I mean really, how you have the audacity to stick around when you have
shown EVERYBODY on the WWW that you or your $1600 DNS Medical
cannot even get a seven letter word like *DESPITE* correct especially
while expecting everybody to take you seriously in something as
complicated as the microphone department trying to prove you are a
microphone expert just because you are playing doctors and nurses
in a hospital. You are retired alright, retired from reality! LOL!

Hmm.. Wonder what he did before he retired, methinks it could be a
janitor or something along those lines and now this is the only way
he can get attention drawn towards him fuelling his need for self
importance.

I noticed once again you mention *occasionally I make spelling mistakes*,
there is no occasionally about it just look at the many above and you are
still trying to wriggle out of this by backtracking and saying you never
used DNS Medical to dictate those posts of yours, you know the repetitive
ones with Mary Poppins and your girlfriend the female astronaut because
once again I repeat, you DO NOT say ANYWHERE in your posts that you
are NOT using your DNS Medical to dictate.

As we all know now, John Doe was wrong and speech recognition programmes
can misspell words, the onus is upon the person owning that software to
make sure the wrong spelling of a word cannot be dictated ever again buy
dumping it.

You still have not proved to the WWW that you DID NOT use speech
recognition which misspelt all of those words above I mention and
that is without checking your latest tirade. BTW, where did you cut
and paste that one from you FRAUD!

Let us look at your so called evidence. Your mate John Doe wrote (BTW,
how much did you pay him to say this?) : -

> Again... Andy... you are flailing about something you misunderstand.
> Mark Conrad does not use speech recognition for his USENET posts,
> that is why he spelled "consistently" wrong. And as I told you
> before, speech recognition cannot misspell words since it chooses
>from a list of words.

John seems to think I misunderstand and he adamantly professes that you do
not use speech recognition for your Usenet posts as stated above clearly.

In that case tell me this, how the hell can he know how you put those
words on to the screen unless he was right there with you watching
you doing it?

Seeing as he is one of your dancing partners you will be telling me next
he was. In fact I would not be surprised if he was probably ****ing
you with his cock so far up your ass that your false teeth fall out.

Once again Mr. Slippery, trying to wriggle out of this one would be
difficult even for Harry Houdini, so you have no chance because you and
your DNS Medical have been exposed for all the WWW to see!

Another thing, do not pretend that there are lots of people in Usenet that
are bothered about me, you mean the one person that is John Doe,
another of your double ups! I am just exposing you as the fraud you
really are!

If a post comes out in my domain and I see it especially when it mentions
my name, I will retaliate so get it into your head you illiterate thick
imbecile, think before you retaliate because I just love pulling your
posts apart.

> Both DNS and WSR have trouble with "near" homonyms, they
> basically can't tell the differences between:

> an and in and end

I will agree with you some words such as the above but not with all, not
if you word wrap the word you want to use within a specially taught
macro and link it with a certain definition, I know, I have done this
with poo-poo and pooh-pooh so once again Johnny boy, you are
incorrect to an extent on this issue also.

> I think I am getting the hang of your idea of logic,
> how am I doing?

Not very well I am afraid and I thought there would be a marked
improvement in your English when I came back from my
break but you are still the sad old illiterate with not many
marbles left trying to prove a point.

All you are doing is stalling the inevitable and that you are still trying
to divert along with your partner in crime that you and your DNS Medical
could have and probably did (noticing by your response and the nerves
that I hit) make schoolboy spelling errors.

There are just a couple of untruths you spouted that need to be put
right by me.

Firstly, it was neither you or Grant that persuaded me to go into the
KnowBrainer forums.

I decided and I decided alone because of the fact I
would be better suited to be in a site such as this where there are not
only DNS experts and microphone experts but there is also a
dedicated forum for WSR run by experts.

The fact you and Grant thought you influenced me on taking that
decision is preposterous, as if I would listen to a dead beat
illiterate like you who cannot even spell, good grief, get over
yourself you sad loser.

And where is your precious Grant now? I notice he is nowhere to be seen
Probably keeping out the way because of his embarrassment with his
double up as a con with you.

Let me tell you and everyone out there what kind of man he was.

He was very persistent on me using DNS which I do now anyway
but I got it on my terms at a fraction of the price over here just
by surfing the web.

He was also very persistent in trying to get out of me the exact
location on where I live In London so he could (as he put it)
"look at my house with Google earth". He must have thought I
was born yesterday and so I just want to warn anybody out
there this so called gentleman is as crooked as the con man.

BE CAREFUL EVERYBODY!

Secondly, the reason the con man will not join a moderated
forum such as the KnowBrainer is because straight away he
loses his need for self importance because inside there
nobody will listen to a down and out pretentious old relic
such as he because they will be listening to the REAL EXPERTS!

The other reason is because there would be a conflict of
interest between his selling of DNS Medical amongst other
Software he peddles and the owner of the KnowBrainer
forums being Lunis Orcutt who also sells DNS products and
microphones.

And now my apology to you. (You did not think I would really
let you off the hook with your unspeakable bullshit above
did you?).

I apologise for your mother *NOT* drowning you at birth
because you were the runt of the litter.

I apologise for your mother *NOT* being able to give you a
proper education which inevitably made you illiterate.

I apologise for you *NOT* being able to shrug off your
inferiority complex.

I apologise for you *NOT* to be any use to man nor beast.

Hey, this cut and pasting lark is easy, makes life much easier.
So this is what your $1600 was used for LOL! You must be
so proud!

andy t




>> I advised you did I not, your welfare check would be better placed
>> for use in a college for people like you with learning
>> difficulties such as English.
>
> No one learns difficulties, Andy, and English is not a learning
> difficulty. More correct might be "With such difficulties as
> learning English."

What? Sounds like we have another illiterate! My transcript read "for
people like you with learning difficulties" so what on earth are you on
about "No one learns difficulties"? I never said they did and my transcript
is perfectly logical and does not need "with such difficulties".

Hmm... Something fishy going on here, methinks John Doe and mark Conrad
could be one or the same person hmm... I wonder.

> Here on USENET, harping on language usage is
> distasteful. If you want to give English lessons, Andy, try
> (alt.usage.english).

No I like it here thanks John or mark or whoever you are.

I send my posts to various newsgroups from my e-mail client. Now I don't
know anything about Usenet or where my posts end up (perhaps you could
enlighten me?) In this particular case, it is sent to
"microsoft.public.windows.vista.general".

If you read that Johnny boy (I have noticed you do not read the posts
properly and you often miss parts that are crucial to the point!) It clearly
states "PUBLIC" so unless you have the rights to this forum or you are Bill
Gates, BUTT OUT!

> BTW, good work above in recognizing "paralyzed can be spelt with a
> "Z"

> In United States English, paralyzed is spelled with a "z".

I already stated that you dummy! READ THE POSTS PROPERLY!

> British English is different than United States English, Andy.

You don't say, gee thanks for telling me something I already know.

>I apologize for *NOT* posting that the main part of your body
>that is paralyzed is your brain.

> Andy is paralyzed from the neck up.

You already said that John or mark, perhaps you have both got dementia,
perhaps you are the same person - now there is a thought!

> once again I repeat, you DO NOT say ANYWHERE in your posts that
> you are NOT using your DNS Medical to dictate.

> That is false, not that it matters.

Prove it!

> As we all know now, John Doe was wrong and speech recognition
> programmes can misspell words,

> And the cow jumped over the moon.

That's it mark, (or alter ego John) keep the words simple just the same as
your brain!

> 1. Mark Conrad said he was not using speech recognition for these
> posts.

Prove it!

So because mark Conrad said he was not using speech recognition we are just
supposed to believe him? Bullshit!


> 2. Speech recognition does not make spelling errors because it
> always chooses from a list of words.

Why do you not read the posts properly or is it a little difficult for you
to take it in? I already proved that speech recognition CAN and HAS spelt
words incorrectly.

In my last post mark Conrad or whoever you are spelt embarrassed with one
"r" so I tried it and dictated the word embarrassed to my DNS 10 and it ALSO
came out with one "r" proving that it can misspell, this is not only the
case with DNS but also with WSR I have found certain words that have come on
screen have been spelt incorrectly.

I guess they would have had to have been put there in the first place.

Once again I repeat and listen carefully this time Johnny boy or whoever you
are, the onus is upon the person who is using that speech recognition
software to correct the wrong word so that it is spelt correctly and dump
the incorrectly spelt word so that it cannot be spelt wrong again.

> Don't let it bother you, Andy.

It doesn't, just correcting you and proving a point.

> There are no spelling errors in my posts, Andy, using the same
> software.

Well perhaps I should look through them and see if you are right but at the
moment we are talking about the genuine spelling mistakes I have exposed in
mark con mans transcripts which he has still not proven to be typed and not
dictated by his very expensive DNS Medical which he has been using for 10
years or so he says.

Seeing as you could both be the same person, I might very well find a
spelling mistake or two in your alter ego mark being John Doe.

> Welcome to USENET, Andy, knock yourself out.

Wrong again, I have already told you where I post from and it clearly does
not state USENET and thanks I will!

Get your facts right and in order Johnny boy or mark con man or both of the
same before posting your bullshit!

andy t

"John Doe" <> wrote in message
news:0Cusl.19461$...
> "andy t" <> wrote:
>> "Mark Conrad" <none-> wrote
>
> ...
>
>> I advised you did I not, your welfare check would be better placed
>> for use in a college for people like you with learning
>> difficulties such as English.
>
> No one learns difficulties, Andy, and English is not a learning
> difficulty. More correct might be "With such difficulties as
> learning English." Here on USENET, harping on language usage is
> distasteful. If you want to give English lessons, Andy, try
> (alt.usage.english).
>
>> I suggest the first thing you do, is buy a decent dictionary and
>> not a toy one like "Merriam Webster's".
>
> And the beat goes on... another target of ridicule.
>
>> BTW, good work above in recognizing "paralyzed can be spelt with a
>> "Z"
>
> In United States English, paralyzed is spelled with a "z".
>
>> "but it can also be spelt with an "S" except with a "Z" we are be
>> led to believe is the U.S. version of that spelling and the
>> alternative is not even in Webster's dictionary proving it is
>> nothing more than a toy dictionary!
>
> British English is different than United States English, Andy.
>
>>> I apologize for *NOT* posting that the main part of your body
>>> that is paralyzed is your brain.
>
> Andy is paralyzed from the neck up.
>
>> You already said that in an earlier post proving once and for all
>> your dementia
>
> alt.psychology
>
>> still trying to wriggle out of this by backtracking and saying you
>> never used DNS Medical to dictate those posts of yours,
>
> Apparently you never consider "motive" or "evidence", Andy.
>
>> once again I repeat, you DO NOT say ANYWHERE in your posts that
>> you are NOT using your DNS Medical to dictate.
>
> That is false, not that it matters.
>
>> As we all know now, John Doe was wrong and speech recognition
>> programmes can misspell words,
>
> And the cow jumped over the moon.
>
>> Your mate John Doe wrote (BTW, how much did you pay him to say
>> this?) : -
>
> As much as everyone else gets paid to post here.
>
>> In that case tell me this, how the hell can he know how you put
>> those words on to the screen unless he was right there with you
>> watching you doing it?
>
> 1. Mark Conrad said he was not using speech recognition for these
> posts.
> 2. Speech recognition does not make spelling errors because it
> always chooses from a list of words.
>
>> Another thing, do not pretend that there are lots of people in
>> Usenet that are bothered about me, you mean the one person that is
>> John Doe,
>
> Don't let it bother you, Andy.
>
>> another of your double ups!
>
> There are no spelling errors in my posts, Andy, using the same
> software.
>
>> If a post comes out in my domain and I see it especially when it
>> mentions my name, I will retaliate so get it into your head you
>> illiterate thick imbecile, think before you retaliate because I
>> just love pulling your posts apart.
>
> Welcome to USENET, Andy, knock yourself out.

"andy t" <> wrote in message
news:#iaaZ$...
> Nice try to divert things from your obvious illiteracy but I believe you
> should have wrote something like: -

"should have written...." 8^)

Tom Lake

Mark Conrad's wife cannot suck him off anymore because every time she tries
her false teeth come out and get stuck on his pubes.

"Mark Conrad" <none-> wrote in message
news:080320091457016888%none-...
> In article <#iaaZ$>, andy t
> <> wrote:
>
>> Nice try to divert things from your obvious illiteracy ...
>
> Wrong, butt thet es 2 b xpected buy a crankee pursun lik
> u woo has nut ben laid fur 20 yers.
>
> "elituracy" meens unabel to reed r writ, i reed & writ
> jus fin, thanc u.
>
> Ef I had nut ben laid fer yers i wud bee crankee 2, but i
> git laid 3 tims a weak, aloong wif miy wifee.
>
> i here thate wen sumone lik u dus nut git laid fer yers,
> thea git reel piky abot gramer en spelin, allso lus trak
> uf whut wurds lik "elituracy" meen.
>
>
>> lemme tell you although my vitrolic posts I feel are just,
>> they really show whatta dork I really am
>
> Wel that isa start, glad u reeliz wat a dork u ar.
>
>
>> Mark Conrad. (Or could it be John Doe?)
>
> Luk at tha headers, u stewpid dork.
>
> Oh, an git urself layed wit thet speshil drug, as et wil
> mak u les piky abot enconsaquintal thengs thet due nut
> mater a rats ass 2 enywun els xcept u, such es spelin.
>
> Mark-

I can't help it if you I am illiterate, I am a retired old fool and cannot
spill proporly. I haven't had a wink in yeers.

"John Doe" <> wrote in message
news:uu#...
> Mark Conrad's wife cannot suck him off anymore because every time she
> tries her false teeth come out and get stuck on his pubes.
>
> "Mark Conrad" <none-> wrote in message
> news:080320091457016888%none-...
>> In article <#iaaZ$>, andy t
>> <> wrote:
>>
>>> Nice try to divert things from your obvious illiteracy ...
>>
>> Wrong, butt thet es 2 b xpected buy a crankee pursun lik
>> u woo has nut ben laid fur 20 yers.
>>
>> "elituracy" meens unabel to reed r writ, i reed & writ
>> jus fin, thanc u.
>>
>> Ef I had nut ben laid fer yers i wud bee crankee 2, but i
>> git laid 3 tims a weak, aloong wif miy wifee.
>>
>> i here thate wen sumone lik u dus nut git laid fer yers,
>> thea git reel piky abot gramer en spelin, allso lus trak
>> uf whut wurds lik "elituracy" meen.
>>
>>
>>> lemme tell you although my vitrolic posts I feel are just,
>>> they really show whatta dork I really am
>>
>> Wel that isa start, glad u reeliz wat a dork u ar.
>>
>>
>>> Mark Conrad. (Or could it be John Doe?)
>>
>> Luk at tha headers, u stewpid dork.
>>
>> Oh, an git urself layed wit thet speshil drug, as et wil
>> mak u les piky abot enconsaquintal thengs thet due nut
>> mater a rats ass 2 enywun els xcept u, such es spelin.
>>
>> Mark-
>

Hey John Doe, I heard your good at sukking, fancy getting your gums around
my plums? I bidly neads som sects

"Mark Conrad" <None-> wrote in message
news:#...

> I can't help it if you I am illiterate, I am a retired old fool and cannot
> spill proporly. I haven't had a wink in yeers.
>
> "John Doe" <> wrote in message
> news:uu#...
>> Mark Conrad's wife cannot suck him off anymore because every time she
>> tries her false teeth come out and get stuck on his pubes.
>>
>> "Mark Conrad" <none-> wrote in message
>> news:080320091457016888%none-...
>>> In article <#iaaZ$>, andy t
>>> <> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Nice try to divert things from your obvious illiteracy ...
>>>
>>> Wrong, butt thet es 2 b xpected buy a crankee pursun lik
>>> u woo has nut ben laid fur 20 yers.
>>>
>>> "elituracy" meens unabel to reed r writ, i reed & writ
>>> jus fin, thanc u.
>>>
>>> Ef I had nut ben laid fer yers i wud bee crankee 2, but i
>>> git laid 3 tims a weak, aloong wif miy wifee.
>>>
>>> i here thate wen sumone lik u dus nut git laid fer yers,
>>> thea git reel piky abot gramer en spelin, allso lus trak
>>> uf whut wurds lik "elituracy" meen.
>>>
>>>
>>>> lemme tell you although my vitrolic posts I feel are just,
>>>> they really show whatta dork I really am
>>>
>>> Wel that isa start, glad u reeliz wat a dork u ar.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Mark Conrad. (Or could it be John Doe?)
>>>
>>> Luk at tha headers, u stewpid dork.
>>>
>>> Oh, an git urself layed wit thet speshil drug, as et wil
>>> mak u les piky abot enconsaquintal thengs thet due nut
>>> mater a rats ass 2 enywun els xcept u, such es spelin.
>>>
>>> Mark-
>>

Wood you mined John Doe winking me off som time becase I hav not had sox in
40 yeers?

"John Doe" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Hey John Doe, I heard your good at sukking, fancy getting your gums around
> my plums? I bidly neads som sects
>
> "Mark Conrad" <None-> wrote in message
> news:#...
>
>> I can't help it if you I am illiterate, I am a retired old fool and
>> cannot spill proporly. I haven't had a wink in yeers.
>>
>> "John Doe" <> wrote in message
>> news:uu#...
>>> Mark Conrad's wife cannot suck him off anymore because every time she
>>> tries her false teeth come out and get stuck on his pubes.
>>>
>>> "Mark Conrad" <none-> wrote in message
>>> news:080320091457016888%none-...
>>>> In article <#iaaZ$>, andy t
>>>> <> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Nice try to divert things from your obvious illiteracy ...
>>>>
>>>> Wrong, butt thet es 2 b xpected buy a crankee pursun lik
>>>> u woo has nut ben laid fur 20 yers.
>>>>
>>>> "elituracy" meens unabel to reed r writ, i reed & writ
>>>> jus fin, thanc u.
>>>>
>>>> Ef I had nut ben laid fer yers i wud bee crankee 2, but i
>>>> git laid 3 tims a weak, aloong wif miy wifee.
>>>>
>>>> i here thate wen sumone lik u dus nut git laid fer yers,
>>>> thea git reel piky abot gramer en spelin, allso lus trak
>>>> uf whut wurds lik "elituracy" meen.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> lemme tell you although my vitrolic posts I feel are just,
>>>>> they really show whatta dork I really am
>>>>
>>>> Wel that isa start, glad u reeliz wat a dork u ar.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Mark Conrad. (Or could it be John Doe?)
>>>>
>>>> Luk at tha headers, u stewpid dork.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, an git urself layed wit thet speshil drug, as et wil
>>>> mak u les piky abot enconsaquintal thengs thet due nut
>>>> mater a rats ass 2 enywun els xcept u, such es spelin.
>>>>
>>>> Mark-
>>>