Re: a system crash at least once a week ..

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:32:48 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:

> "Doug Mentohl" <> wrote in message
> news:e60d613d-efe6-49ab-a64d-...
>> "The company's Linux-based platform made it difficult and expensive to
>> collaborate with clients effectively because a majority of its
>> customers work in a Microsoft-based IT environment"
>>
>> "With Linux on the back end, Capital Engineering found there were
>> issues with exposing confidential information when sharing data with
>> clients. The need for greater security was a key driver in moving to a
>> Microsoft-based platform"
>>
>> "In the past with the Linux server, this was difficult without having
>> someone onsite to provide an open connection to a certain folder.
>> There was way more overhead involved with sharing data on the Linux
>> server."
>>
>> "Capital Engineering's Linux solution could no longer keep up with the
>> volume of message traffic being generated by the growing company, and
>> mobile users could not access email and customer data easily when they
>> were travelling or working offsite"
>>
>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at least
>> once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has virtually
>> eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>
>> - Ed Castillo, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital Engineering
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/canada/case...gineering.mspx
>>
>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at least
>> once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has virtually
>> eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>
>> - Hussein Kaddoura, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital
>> Engineering
>
>
> They must have been using one of the more stable and mature versions of
> linux if it was only crashing once a week. It's a well known fact that most
> linux machines grind to a halt within days or sometimes hours because of
> memory leaks in the kernel.

Not to mention inept administration.
Take Roy Schestowitz for example.
Please............

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

"Moshe Goldfarb" <> wrote in message
news:kvlvneuoufhd$....
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:32:48 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
>
> Not to mention inept administration.
> Take Roy Schestowitz for example.
> Please............
>
> --
> Moshe Goldfarb
> Collector of soaps from around the globe.
> Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
> http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Better call your HMO doctor and get the help you need.

Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:32:48 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
>
>> "Doug Mentohl" <> wrote in message
>> news:e60d613d-efe6-49ab-a64d-...
>>> "The company's Linux-based platform made it difficult and expensive
>>> to collaborate with clients effectively because a majority of its
>>> customers work in a Microsoft-based IT environment"
>>>
>>> "With Linux on the back end, Capital Engineering found there were
>>> issues with exposing confidential information when sharing data with
>>> clients. The need for greater security was a key driver in moving
>>> to a Microsoft-based platform"
>>>
>>> "In the past with the Linux server, this was difficult without
>>> having someone onsite to provide an open connection to a certain
>>> folder. There was way more overhead involved with sharing data on
>>> the Linux server."
>>>
>>> "Capital Engineering's Linux solution could no longer keep up with
>>> the volume of message traffic being generated by the growing
>>> company, and mobile users could not access email and customer data
>>> easily when they were travelling or working offsite"
>>>
>>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at least
>>> once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has virtually
>>> eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>>
>>> - Ed Castillo, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital Engineering
>>>
>>> http://www.microsoft.com/canada/case...gineering.mspx
>>>
>>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at least
>>> once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has virtually
>>> eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>>
>>> - Hussein Kaddoura, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital
>>> Engineering
>>
>>
>> They must have been using one of the more stable and mature versions
>> of linux if it was only crashing once a week. It's a well known fact
>> that most linux machines grind to a halt within days or sometimes
>> hours because of memory leaks in the kernel.
>
> Not to mention inept administration.
> Take Roy Schestowitz for example.
> Please............

I hope he doesn't take me; he might give me a virus!
--
http://www.kustomkomputa.co.uk
- Personalised Desktop Computers

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:51:23 -0000, Dr.Hal0nf1r£$ wrote:

> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:32:48 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>> "Doug Mentohl" <> wrote in message
>>> news:e60d613d-efe6-49ab-a64d-...
>>>> "The company's Linux-based platform made it difficult and expensive
>>>> to collaborate with clients effectively because a majority of its
>>>> customers work in a Microsoft-based IT environment"
>>>>
>>>> "With Linux on the back end, Capital Engineering found there were
>>>> issues with exposing confidential information when sharing data with
>>>> clients. The need for greater security was a key driver in moving
>>>> to a Microsoft-based platform"
>>>>
>>>> "In the past with the Linux server, this was difficult without
>>>> having someone onsite to provide an open connection to a certain
>>>> folder. There was way more overhead involved with sharing data on
>>>> the Linux server."
>>>>
>>>> "Capital Engineering's Linux solution could no longer keep up with
>>>> the volume of message traffic being generated by the growing
>>>> company, and mobile users could not access email and customer data
>>>> easily when they were travelling or working offsite"
>>>>
>>>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at least
>>>> once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has virtually
>>>> eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>>>
>>>> - Ed Castillo, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital Engineering
>>>>
>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/canada/case...gineering.mspx
>>>>
>>>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at least
>>>> once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has virtually
>>>> eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>>>
>>>> - Hussein Kaddoura, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital
>>>> Engineering
>>>
>>>
>>> They must have been using one of the more stable and mature versions
>>> of linux if it was only crashing once a week. It's a well known fact
>>> that most linux machines grind to a halt within days or sometimes
>>> hours because of memory leaks in the kernel.
>>
>> Not to mention inept administration.
>> Take Roy Schestowitz for example.
>> Please............
>
> I hope he doesn't take me; he might give me a virus!

Yea....
The guy is a walking petri dish...

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

"Moshe Goldfarb" <> wrote in message
news:mz46dlk9pmgo.1xjg8fhsmh84r$....
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:51:23 -0000, Dr.Hal0nf1r£$ wrote:
>
>> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:32:48 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Doug Mentohl" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:e60d613d-efe6-49ab-a64d-...
>>>>> "The company's Linux-based platform made it difficult and expensive
>>>>> to collaborate with clients effectively because a majority of its
>>>>> customers work in a Microsoft-based IT environment"
>>>>>
>>>>> "With Linux on the back end, Capital Engineering found there were
>>>>> issues with exposing confidential information when sharing data with
>>>>> clients. The need for greater security was a key driver in moving
>>>>> to a Microsoft-based platform"
>>>>>
>>>>> "In the past with the Linux server, this was difficult without
>>>>> having someone onsite to provide an open connection to a certain
>>>>> folder. There was way more overhead involved with sharing data on
>>>>> the Linux server."
>>>>>
>>>>> "Capital Engineering's Linux solution could no longer keep up with
>>>>> the volume of message traffic being generated by the growing
>>>>> company, and mobile users could not access email and customer data
>>>>> easily when they were travelling or working offsite"
>>>>>
>>>>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at least
>>>>> once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has virtually
>>>>> eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>>>>
>>>>> - Ed Castillo, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital Engineering
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/canada/case...gineering.mspx
>>>>>
>>>>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at least
>>>>> once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has virtually
>>>>> eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>>>>
>>>>> - Hussein Kaddoura, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital
>>>>> Engineering
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They must have been using one of the more stable and mature versions
>>>> of linux if it was only crashing once a week. It's a well known fact
>>>> that most linux machines grind to a halt within days or sometimes
>>>> hours because of memory leaks in the kernel.
>>>
>>> Not to mention inept administration.
>>> Take Roy Schestowitz for example.
>>> Please............
>>
>> I hope he doesn't take me; he might give me a virus!
>
> Yea....
> The guy is a walking petri dish...
>

And you are the CRAP that fills the petri dish. Just FYI


> --
> Moshe Goldfarb
> Collector of soaps from around the globe.
> Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
> http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/

Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:51:23 -0000, Dr.Hal0nf1r£$ wrote:
>
>> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:32:48 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Doug Mentohl" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:e60d613d-efe6-49ab-a64d-...
>>>>> "The company's Linux-based platform made it difficult and
>>>>> expensive to collaborate with clients effectively because a
>>>>> majority of its customers work in a Microsoft-based IT
>>>>> environment"
>>>>>
>>>>> "With Linux on the back end, Capital Engineering found there were
>>>>> issues with exposing confidential information when sharing data
>>>>> with clients. The need for greater security was a key driver in
>>>>> moving to a Microsoft-based platform"
>>>>>
>>>>> "In the past with the Linux server, this was difficult without
>>>>> having someone onsite to provide an open connection to a certain
>>>>> folder. There was way more overhead involved with sharing data on
>>>>> the Linux server."
>>>>>
>>>>> "Capital Engineering's Linux solution could no longer keep up with
>>>>> the volume of message traffic being generated by the growing
>>>>> company, and mobile users could not access email and customer data
>>>>> easily when they were travelling or working offsite"
>>>>>
>>>>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at
>>>>> least once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has
>>>>> virtually eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>>>>
>>>>> - Ed Castillo, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital
>>>>> Engineering
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/canada/case...gineering.mspx
>>>>>
>>>>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at
>>>>> least once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has
>>>>> virtually eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>>>>
>>>>> - Hussein Kaddoura, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital
>>>>> Engineering
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They must have been using one of the more stable and mature
>>>> versions of linux if it was only crashing once a week. It's a well
>>>> known fact that most linux machines grind to a halt within days or
>>>> sometimes hours because of memory leaks in the kernel.
>>>
>>> Not to mention inept administration.
>>> Take Roy Schestowitz for example.
>>> Please............
>>
>> I hope he doesn't take me; he might give me a virus!
>
> Yea....
> The guy is a walking petri dish...

Little do the Usenet community know that behind that guise of a simple
asshole on a mission to harm Microsoft; in truth the real identity of Roy
Schestowitz is none other than the techno-supervillain Jairus the Virus.

--
http://www.kustomkomputa.co.uk
- Personalised Desktop Computers

On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:17:20 -0000, Dr.Hal0nf1r£$ wrote:

> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:51:23 -0000, Dr.Hal0nf1r£$ wrote:
>>
>>> Moshe Goldfarb wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:32:48 -0400, Ezekiel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Doug Mentohl" <> wrote in message
>>>>> news:e60d613d-efe6-49ab-a64d-...
>>>>>> "The company's Linux-based platform made it difficult and
>>>>>> expensive to collaborate with clients effectively because a
>>>>>> majority of its customers work in a Microsoft-based IT
>>>>>> environment"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "With Linux on the back end, Capital Engineering found there were
>>>>>> issues with exposing confidential information when sharing data
>>>>>> with clients. The need for greater security was a key driver in
>>>>>> moving to a Microsoft-based platform"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "In the past with the Linux server, this was difficult without
>>>>>> having someone onsite to provide an open connection to a certain
>>>>>> folder. There was way more overhead involved with sharing data on
>>>>>> the Linux server."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Capital Engineering's Linux solution could no longer keep up with
>>>>>> the volume of message traffic being generated by the growing
>>>>>> company, and mobile users could not access email and customer data
>>>>>> easily when they were travelling or working offsite"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at
>>>>>> least once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has
>>>>>> virtually eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Ed Castillo, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital
>>>>>> Engineering
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.microsoft.com/canada/case...gineering.mspx
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "With the Linux-based platform we would have a system crash at
>>>>>> least once a week. Migrating to a Microsoft-based system has
>>>>>> virtually eliminated server crashes and we have vendor support."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Hussein Kaddoura, Information Technology Team Lead, Capital
>>>>>> Engineering
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> They must have been using one of the more stable and mature
>>>>> versions of linux if it was only crashing once a week. It's a well
>>>>> known fact that most linux machines grind to a halt within days or
>>>>> sometimes hours because of memory leaks in the kernel.
>>>>
>>>> Not to mention inept administration.
>>>> Take Roy Schestowitz for example.
>>>> Please............
>>>
>>> I hope he doesn't take me; he might give me a virus!
>>
>> Yea....
>> The guy is a walking petri dish...
>
> Little do the Usenet community know that behind that guise of a simple
> asshole on a mission to harm Microsoft; in truth the real identity of Roy
> Schestowitz is none other than the techno-supervillain Jairus the Virus.

Yea!
He's traveling in FOG-nito....

--
Moshe Goldfarb
Collector of soaps from around the globe.
Please visit The Hall of Linux Idiots:
http://linuxidiots.blogspot.com/