Re: about UAC>> We've heard loud and clear that you are frustrated.

On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:51:28 +0300, "the granter of sina"
<> wrote:

> We will improve the dialog UI so that you
>can better understand and make more informed choices."

Yeah, they'll probably "improve" them the same way Vista "improves"
the tried and true prompts when copying files from one directory to
another and finding duplicates. They'll take it from "clear and
concise" to "totally obfuscated and annoying"

"+Bob+" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:51:28 +0300, "the granter of sina"
> <> wrote:
>
>> We will improve the dialog UI so that you
>>can better understand and make more informed choices."
>
> Yeah, they'll probably "improve" them the same way Vista "improves"
> the tried and true prompts when copying files from one directory to
> another and finding duplicates. They'll take it from "clear and
> concise" to "totally obfuscated and annoying"
>


Traffic signals must throw you thru a loop.
What a putz2

--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis

"the granter of sina" <> wrote in message
news:48eeba64$...
> can you state your opinion about the improvement of the new copy - move
> dialogues in vista compared to the older ones?
>

That it is pretty clear and easy to understand.
What part of the duplicate file replace dialogue box do you not understand ?


> "D. Eth" <> wrote in message
> news:gcmb02$5up$...
>> "+Bob+" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 12:51:28 +0300, "the granter of sina"
>>> <> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We will improve the dialog UI so that you
>>>>can better understand and make more informed choices."
>>>
>>> Yeah, they'll probably "improve" them the same way Vista "improves"
>>> the tried and true prompts when copying files from one directory to
>>> another and finding duplicates. They'll take it from "clear and
>>> concise" to "totally obfuscated and annoying"
>>>
>>
>>
>> Traffic signals must throw you thru a loop.
>> What a putz2
>>
>> --
>> Ens causa sui
>> Fit caedes omnibus locis
>
>



--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis

the granter of sina wrote:
> can you state your opinion about the improvement of the new copy - move
> dialogues in vista compared to the older ones?

You really want to know?
Vista is more truthful as it shows approximately when the process is
completed.
XP shows the process to completed when it's only cached.
But you already knew this right?
Or did you!

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:25:53 -0700, Frank <> wrote:

>the granter of sina wrote:
>> can you state your opinion about the improvement of the new copy - move
>> dialogues in vista compared to the older ones?
>
>You really want to know?
>Vista is more truthful as it shows approximately when the process is
>completed.

Frank, we all know you're too damn dumb to know how stupid Vista
really is. So let me help you understand by showing you some of
hundreds of really DUMB Vista error messages.

This one is cute in that Vista is bitching about itself taking too
long to run it's own Diagnostics:

http://foggytown.files.wordpress.com...ror-cut111.png

How about this one. Vista saying it will take 25,802 days plus 5 hours
to copy ONE file that's only 273 MB in size.

http://beconfused.com/images/2007/08...-remaining.jpg

Finally Vista itself is way more truthful than any fanboy clown.

Note Vista correctly complains about explorer.exe causing Vista to run
slowly. Fancy that bit of irony you clueless dumb ****.

http://www.technosailor.com/wp-conte...06/02/bb65.jpg

the granter of sina wrote:

>> Vista is more truthful as it shows approximately when the process is
>> completed.
>
>
> This has never created any problems in Xp ever. However its funny to see
> that the much slower copy and move speed of vista has produced
> results as big as hundreds of years to copy files for users all around
> the world. I have posted screenshots.. or shall I say screenshits of vista
> accurately calculating the time needed for example 23478 days.. lol Do
> you want me to find screenshots franky poo? Cant handle the facts huh?
>

I guess you missed the point all together. Nothing unusual for a baboon
brained idiot moron loser like you.
You're stating a problem a relatively few users experienced (I did
briefly with one of betas) that has been solved with updates and I'm
telling you the real difference in what XP vs Vista is telling us.
Now I'm sure you didn't know that.
Figures...baboon brain!...LOL!

On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:50:37 -0700, Frank <> wrote:

>the granter of sina wrote:
>
>>> Vista is more truthful as it shows approximately when the process is
>>> completed.
>>
>>
>> This has never created any problems in Xp ever. However its funny to see
>> that the much slower copy and move speed of vista has produced
>> results as big as hundreds of years to copy files for users all around
>> the world. I have posted screenshots.. or shall I say screenshits of vista
>> accurately calculating the time needed for example 23478 days.. lol Do
>> you want me to find screenshots franky poo? Cant handle the facts huh?
>>
>
>I guess you missed the point all together. Nothing unusual for a baboon
>brained idiot moron loser like you.
>You're stating a problem a relatively few users experienced (I did
>briefly with one of betas) that has been solved with updates and I'm
>telling you the real difference in what XP vs Vista is telling us.
>Now I'm sure you didn't know that.
>Figures...baboon brain!...LOL!

As usual, just Frank bullshit. I just saw one of those funny it will
take thousands of days to copy a file the other day and fool, I have
SP1 installed and the appropriate updates for my system and aside from
me pointing out the multitude of stupid blunders build into Vista my
system runs fine.

As usual the idiot Frank tries to defend Microsoft incompetence.