Re: Ubuntu 7.10 on Virtual PC 2007?

dennis@home wrote:

>
>
> "PeterKöhlmann" <> wrote in message
> news:fpjkcs$hn0$02$...
>
>
>> Why do you think that people in a ubuntu group would run a stable OS on a
>> unstable Host?
>> Running windows as a guest system in a VM on a linux host makes much more
>> sense than the other way around
>
> Especially when you don't have linux drivers for some of the hardware.
> Do you always jump in and tell people they are wrong without thinking
> first? It appears that you do.
>

Strange. I have linux drivers for *all* the hardware in my different
computers.
Face it: The driver situation for Vista is worse than for linux, and for
64bit Vista it is completely shitty.

As usual, you are blubbering your idiotic drivel. You have no idea at all
about linux, and you try to compensate that with idiocy

Figures. You are a Vista user. It can't get possibly dumber than that
--
Microsoft? Is that some kind of a toilet paper?

Peter Köhlmann <> writes:

> dennis@home wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "PeterKöhlmann" <> wrote in message
>> news:fpjkcs$hn0$02$...
>>
>>
>>> Why do you think that people in a ubuntu group would run a stable OS on a
>>> unstable Host?
>>> Running windows as a guest system in a VM on a linux host makes much more
>>> sense than the other way around
>>
>> Especially when you don't have linux drivers for some of the hardware.
>> Do you always jump in and tell people they are wrong without thinking
>> first? It appears that you do.
>>
>
> Strange. I have linux drivers for *all* the hardware in my different
> computers.

Strange. No one gives a flying **** about your HW and how it
works. Strangely enough they are interested in their HW and how THAT
works. Your constant lies and bullshit are turning this help group in to
another COLA. You constantly claiming Linux is "perfect" and "all HW
works" is a load of bollox and you know it. Now go away and pull the
legs off some spiders or something.

Hadron wrote:

> Peter Köhlmann <> writes:
>
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "PeterKöhlmann" <> wrote in message
>>> news:fpjkcs$hn0$02$...
>>>
>>>
>>>> Why do you think that people in a ubuntu group would run a stable OS on
>>>> a unstable Host?
>>>> Running windows as a guest system in a VM on a linux host makes much
>>>> more sense than the other way around
>>>
>>> Especially when you don't have linux drivers for some of the hardware.
>>> Do you always jump in and tell people they are wrong without thinking
>>> first? It appears that you do.
>>>
>>
>> Strange. I have linux drivers for *all* the hardware in my different
>> computers.
>
> Strange. No one gives a flying **** about your HW and how it
> works. Strangely enough they are interested in their HW and how THAT
> works. Your constant lies and bullshit are turning this help group in to
> another COLA. You constantly claiming Linux is "perfect" and "all HW
> works" is a load of bollox and you know it. Now go away and pull the
> legs off some spiders or something.

Works better than Vista. Right or wrong?

Cheers.

--
The world can't afford the rich.

Q: What OS is built for lusers?
A: Which one requires running lusermgr.msc to create them?

My Killfile List: Frank, dennis@home ... Sorry, won't be able to read your
BS any longer.

NoStop wrote:


>
> Works better than Vista. Right or wrong?
>
> Cheers.
>

You idiot...nothing works better than Vista!
Frank

"PeterKöhlmann" <> wrote in message
news:fpk350$ib4$02$...
> dennis@home wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> "PeterKöhlmann" <> wrote in message
>> news:fpjkcs$hn0$02$...
>>
>>
>>> Why do you think that people in a ubuntu group would run a stable OS on
>>> a
>>> unstable Host?
>>> Running windows as a guest system in a VM on a linux host makes much
>>> more
>>> sense than the other way around
>>
>> Especially when you don't have linux drivers for some of the hardware.
>> Do you always jump in and tell people they are wrong without thinking
>> first? It appears that you do.
>>
>
> Strange. I have linux drivers for *all* the hardware in my different
> computers.
> Face it: The driver situation for Vista is worse than for linux, and for
> 64bit Vista it is completely shitty.

Don't start another stupid thread.. You may have all the drivers for your
hardware.. many don't and I can give you a list if you feel like doing
something useful and writing a couple. The most useful to me would be a a
driver for my Kodak Advantix filmdrive APS scanner.

>
> As usual, you are blubbering your idiotic drivel. You have no idea at all
> about linux, and you try to compensate that with idiocy

OK so prove you know something and find me a working driver for the scanner
above.
Then if you prove useful maybe I could ask about some of the other hardware
I would like to work under linux.



Pause while we wait for the inevitable use google/find it yourself reply
that you will try to hide behind to try and prove you were correct.

"NoStop" <> wrote in message
news:...

> Works better than Vista. Right or wrong?
>

8<

> My Killfile List: Frank, dennis@home ... Sorry, won't be able to read your
> BS any longer.

Unfortunately it doesn't stop your nostop bullshit.

dennis@home wrote:

>
>
> "PeterKöhlmann" <> wrote in message
> news:fpk350$ib4$02$...
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "PeterKöhlmann" <> wrote in message
>>> news:fpjkcs$hn0$02$...
>>>
>>>
>>>> Why do you think that people in a ubuntu group would run a stable OS on
>>>> a
>>>> unstable Host?
>>>> Running windows as a guest system in a VM on a linux host makes much
>>>> more
>>>> sense than the other way around
>>>
>>> Especially when you don't have linux drivers for some of the hardware.
>>> Do you always jump in and tell people they are wrong without thinking
>>> first? It appears that you do.
>>>
>>
>> Strange. I have linux drivers for *all* the hardware in my different
>> computers.
>> Face it: The driver situation for Vista is worse than for linux, and for
>> 64bit Vista it is completely shitty.
>
> Don't start another stupid thread.. You may have all the drivers for your
> hardware.. many don't and I can give you a list if you feel like doing
> something useful and writing a couple. The most useful to me would be a a
> driver for my Kodak Advantix filmdrive APS scanner.
>
Phone Kodak you Wintard.

>>
>> As usual, you are blubbering your idiotic drivel. You have no idea at all
>> about linux, and you try to compensate that with idiocy
>
> OK so prove you know something and find me a working driver for the
> scanner above.
> Then if you prove useful maybe I could ask about some of the other
> hardware I would like to work under linux.
>
Phone Kodak you Wintard.
>
>
> Pause while we wait for the inevitable use google/find it yourself reply
> that you will try to hide behind to try and prove you were correct.

Idiot! Who ties your shoelaces in the morning? Did MickeyMouse provide you
with Windoze drivers for that Kodak device? Did you slam M$ because they
didn't?

Cheers.

--
The three Rs of Microsoft support: Retry, Reboot, Reinstall.

Proprietary Software: a 20th Century software business model.

Q: What OS is built for lusers?
A: Which one requires running lusermgr.msc to create them?

Contact AlexB to find out how to "delouse" your Vista system.

"Frank" <> wrote in message
news:47bdc62d$0$17326$...
> NoStop wrote:
>
>
>>
>> Works better than Vista. Right or wrong?
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>
> You idiot...nothing works better than Vista!
> Frank

My Wife Works Better Than Vista. She Can Suck A Basketball Through A Garden
Hose. Just FYI

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:01:50 -0800, NoStop wrote:

> dennis@home wrote:
>
>
>>
>> "PeterKöhlmann" <> wrote in message
>> news:fpk350$ib4$02$...
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> "PeterKöhlmann" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:fpjkcs$hn0$02$...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Why do you think that people in a ubuntu group would run a stable OS
>>>>> on a
>>>>> unstable Host?
>>>>> Running windows as a guest system in a VM on a linux host makes much
>>>>> more
>>>>> sense than the other way around
>>>>
>>>> Especially when you don't have linux drivers for some of the
>>>> hardware. Do you always jump in and tell people they are wrong
>>>> without thinking first? It appears that you do.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Strange. I have linux drivers for *all* the hardware in my different
>>> computers.
>>> Face it: The driver situation for Vista is worse than for linux, and
>>> for 64bit Vista it is completely shitty.
>>
>> Don't start another stupid thread.. You may have all the drivers for
>> your hardware.. many don't and I can give you a list if you feel like
>> doing something useful and writing a couple. The most useful to me
>> would be a a driver for my Kodak Advantix filmdrive APS scanner.
>>
> Phone Kodak you Wintard.
>
>

Here is Kodak's answer:

http://www.kodak.com/global/en/servi...4608.jhtml?pq-
path=4497/4532

I do wonder how well it works under Vista....seeing how any google
references to drivers for that device date back to Win98 drivers.

--
Stephan
1986 Pontiac Fiero GT

��事��出�日�ん�����
��事忘れ�������ら

>> Phone Kodak you Wintard.
>>
> Here is Kodak's answer:
>
> http://www.kodak.com/global/en/servi...4608.jhtml?pq-
> path=4497/4532
>
> I do wonder how well it works under Vista....seeing how any google
> references to drivers for that device date back to Win98 drivers.

Yep, Linux sucks because they can't find a driver for my 8 year old
scanner.

But if a you've got a 2 year old piece of HW that doesn't have Vista
drivers, it the 3rd party's problem.