On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:35:48 +0100, Downsie
<> wrote:
> I have used PC Tools "Registry Mechanic" for about 2 years and I have
> found it to be quick, easy and reliable.
Then consider yourself lucky. Registry cleaning programs are *all*
snake oil. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed and is dangerous.
Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry cleaner. Despite
what many people think, and what vendors of registry cleaning software
try to convince you of, having unused registry entries doesn't really
hurt you.
The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously
removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit
it may have.
Read
http://www.edbott.com/weblog/archives/000643.html
and
http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099
and also
http://blogs.technet.com/markrussino...t-of-life.aspx
Let me point out that neither I nor anyone else who warns against the
use of registry cleaners has ever said that they always cause
problems. If they always caused problems, they would disappear from
the market almost immediately. Many people have used a registry
cleaner and never had a problem with it.
Rather, the problem with a registry cleaner is that it carries with it
the substantial *risk* of having a problem. And since there is no
benefit to using a registry cleaner, running that risk is a very bad
bargain.
> Out of curiosity, I ran Uniblue's trial product AFTER a full scan &
> clean up by Registry Mechanic.
> You'll never guess what. Uniblue reported over 120 errors in my
> registry.
>I checked again with Registry Mechanic and there were no errors.
> How strange is that? It's almost as if Uniblue is trying to deceive me
> so I buy their product. But that can't be, can it?
Sure it can.
--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP (Windows Desktop Experience) since 2003
Please Reply to the Newsgroup