Re: The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows7!

kevpan815 wrote:
> The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!

Who's verdict? What consortium decided this? What solid information do
you base this on? Where is the link(s) backing up your claim? All I see
is an unfounded statement to be ignored.

In MY and MANY others testing, Win 7 is/will be MUCH better than Vista
right out-of-the-box. ..Leaner, meaner, faster. Go install and uninstall
some more OS's and quit spreading moronic crap. ..Hell, you don't leave
ANYTHING installed long enough to FULLY test it, yet you spew your
constant meaningless, moronic, reports.

Get a life.

G'day

"Muad'Dib" <> wrote in message
news:...
> kevpan815 wrote:
>> The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!
>
> Who's verdict? What consortium decided this? What solid information do
> you base this on? Where is the link(s) backing your claim? All I see is an
> unfounded statement to be ignored.

FYI

Check out the link below to view available toys that can be used in the new
Windows 7.

http://www.6thsin.com/?gclid=CKjh-I3W05wCFU0A4wodvVinJQ



For Your Information, that was FYI.

wrote:
>
>
> "Muad'Dib" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> kevpan815 wrote:
>>> The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!
>>
>> Who's verdict? What consortium decided this? What solid information
>> do you base this on? Where is the link(s) backing your claim? All I
>> see is an unfounded statement to be ignored.
>
> FYI
>
> Check out the link below to view available toys that can be used in the new
> Windows 7.
>
> http://www.6thsin.com/?gclid=CKjh-I3W05wCFU0A4wodvVinJQ
>
>
>
> For Your Information, that was FYI.
>
>
>

Your home page, nymshifter?

Alias

kevpan815 wrote:
> On Sep 3, 3:53 am, Muad'Dib <idaspu...@nospamhotmail.com> wrote:
>> kevpan815 wrote:
>>> The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!
>> Who's verdict? What consortium decided this? What solid information do
>> you base this on? Where is the link(s) backing up your claim? All I see
>> is an unfounded statement to be ignored.
>>
>> In MY and MANY others testing, Win 7 is/will be MUCH better than Vista
>> right out-of-the-box. ..Leaner, meaner, faster. Go install and uninstall
>> some more OS's and quit spreading moronic crap. ..Hell, you don't leave
>> ANYTHING installed long enough to FULLY test it, yet you spew your
>> constant meaningless, moronic, reports.
>>
>> Get a life.
>>
>> G'day
>
> With All Due Respect: I Currently Have The Windows 7 RTM Enterprise
> Edition (Build 7600) 90 Day Free Trial Installed On My Computer, And
> It Is As Slow As A Sleepy Turtle, Just Like The Slowski's In Comcast's
> High Speed Internet Commercials, Just FYI. Windows 7 Server RTM 180
> Day Free Trial Performs Much Better Than This, Also Just FYI.

The general user couldn't give a rat's A** about Win 7 Server, so has
little to do with Win 7 here. As always anyone's MMV, but I seriously
doubt the validity of your statement.

G'day

On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:53:18 -0600, Muad'Dib
<> wrote:

>kevpan815 wrote:
>> The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!
>
> Who's verdict? What consortium decided this? What solid information do
>you base this on? Where is the link(s) backing up your claim? All I see
>is an unfounded statement to be ignored.

Perhaps he's used a new Windows release before? Anyone who maintains
MS-Windows professionally always advises waiting until SP1.

Of course, if you want to consider Win7 as Visa SP3, then maybe it's
OK to use.

+Bob+ wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:53:18 -0600, Muad'Dib
> <> wrote:
>
>> kevpan815 wrote:
>>> The Verdict: Wait Until Service Pack 1 Before You Buy Windows 7!
>> Who's verdict? What consortium decided this? What solid information do
>> you base this on? Where is the link(s) backing up your claim? All I see
>> is an unfounded statement to be ignored.
>
> Perhaps he's used a new Windows release before? Anyone who maintains
> MS-Windows professionally always advises waiting until SP1.
>
> Of course, if you want to consider Win7 as Visa SP3, then maybe it's
> OK to use.

In my testing, (Beta and now RC), Both Beta and RC smokes Vista in every
way, including STABILITY. Naturally, anyones MMV.

G'day

"Muad'Dib" <> wrote in message
news:...
> +Bob+ wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 02:53:18 -0600, Muad'Dib
>> <> wrote:

> In my testing, (Beta and now RC), Both Beta and RC smokes Vista in every
> way, including STABILITY. Naturally, anyones MMV.
>
> G'day

How would you know? They say, information takes a while longer to reach
Australia.

BTW, someone ought to let you know that the Beatles have split up.

+Bob+ wrote:
>
>
> Perhaps he's used a new Windows release before?


Unlikely.


> Anyone who maintains
> MS-Windows professionally always advises waiting until SP1.
>

That is completely untrue. Granted, a few incompetents always advise
that, but that's a far cry form "Anyone who maintains MS-Windows
professionally...." From my point of view, only the most unprofessional
blame the OS for their own lack of preparedness.


--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
killed a great many philosophers.
~ Denis Diderot

On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 09:30:56 -0600, Bruce Chambers
<3t> wrote:

>
>> Anyone who maintains
>> MS-Windows professionally always advises waiting until SP1.
>>
>
> That is completely untrue. Granted, a few incompetents always advise
>that, but that's a far cry form "Anyone who maintains MS-Windows
>professionally...." From my point of view, only the most unprofessional
>blame the OS for their own lack of preparedness.

You're the incompetent if you upgrade business customers to a new
version of windows before SP1. Every recent Windows release - Vista,
XP, Win2K - was known for being unusable before SP1. In addition,
there hasn't been a single MS OS that hasn't run appreciably better
after SP1.

You'd better go back to your Mom and Pop shops now and do your
upgrades. Mom and Pop won't notice how bad it sucks.

On Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:18:12 -0400, "Mr.Pancks"
<> wrote:

>+Bob+ wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 06 Sep 2009 09:30:56 -0600, Bruce Chambers
>> <3t> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> Anyone who maintains
>>>> MS-Windows professionally always advises waiting until SP1.
>>>>
>>>
>>>That is completely untrue. Granted, a few incompetents always advise
>>>that, but that's a far cry form "Anyone who maintains MS-Windows
>>>professionally...." From my point of view, only the most unprofessional
>>>blame the OS for their own lack of preparedness.
>>
>> You're the incompetent if you upgrade business customers to a new
>> version of windows before SP1. Every recent Windows release - Vista,
>> XP, Win2K - was known for being unusable before SP1. In addition,
>> there hasn't been a single MS OS that hasn't run appreciably better
>> after SP1.
>>
>> You'd better go back to your Mom and Pop shops now and do your
>> upgrades. Mom and Pop won't notice how bad it sucks.
>
>Vista sp2 was a downgrade.
>****in right clicking the desktop takes 7 seconds for a window to show up.
>Friggen disgusting that a Windows OS behaves that way.
>
>I'd fire the lot of them.
>
>Disgraceful...POS

SP2 increased network performance a bit IME (it was about 10x slower
than XP before that; now it's just a little bit slower). It also made
sleep/hibernate performance a little bit more reliable, although it's
still only at about 75% reliable.

I'm not familiar with the problem you cite and there have not been a
lot of reports of it.