Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista Security > Re: Vista and Conficker?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: Vista and Conficker?

 
 
Paul Smith
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-30-2009
"Maurice" <> wrote in message
news:11F4D78E-7977-4AFA-955E-...
> I write to inquire if MS will have an update for this threat? Not just a
> removal tool after the event? Much thanks in advance for an informed
> opinion.


The exploit Conficker uses was patched prior to Conficker being released in
October 2008. If Automatic Updates were enabled this was a non-issue.

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec.../MS08-067.mspx

If you've already been effected the Removal Tool can remove it:

http://www.microsoft.com/security/ma...e/default.mspx

--
Paul Smith,
Yeovil, UK.
Microsoft MVP Windows Desktop Experience.
http://www.dasmirnov.net/




 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Tom
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-30-2009
I downloaded the Patch, and when I applied it, a message said something
like "this patch is not required...".

How can I tell if the patch or update is correctly installed (Vista 64)?

-tom

On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:04:01 -0700, Paul Smith
<> wrote:

> "Maurice" <> wrote in message
> news:11F4D78E-7977-4AFA-955E-...
>> I write to inquire if MS will have an update for this threat? Not just
>> a
>> removal tool after the event? Much thanks in advance for an informed
>> opinion.

>
> The exploit Conficker uses was patched prior to Conficker being released
> in October 2008. If Automatic Updates were enabled this was a non-issue.
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec.../MS08-067.mspx
>
> If you've already been effected the Removal Tool can remove it:
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/security/ma...e/default.mspx
>




--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
 
Reply With Quote
 
John Barnett MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-30-2009
If the patch is 'not required' you probably already have it installed. Make
a note of the KB number and check your update history (windows updates>view
update history) to see if the fix has been applied.

--

--
John Barnett MVP
Windows XP Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience

Web: http://www.winuser.co.uk
Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org
Web: http://www.silversurfer-guide.com

The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..


"Tom" <> wrote in message
news...
> I downloaded the Patch, and when I applied it, a message said something
> like "this patch is not required...".
>
> How can I tell if the patch or update is correctly installed (Vista 64)?
>
> -tom
>
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 04:04:01 -0700, Paul Smith
> <> wrote:
>
>> "Maurice" <> wrote in message
>> news:11F4D78E-7977-4AFA-955E-...
>>> I write to inquire if MS will have an update for this threat? Not just
>>> a
>>> removal tool after the event? Much thanks in advance for an informed
>>> opinion.

>>
>> The exploit Conficker uses was patched prior to Conficker being released
>> in October 2008. If Automatic Updates were enabled this was a non-issue.
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec.../MS08-067.mspx
>>
>> If you've already been effected the Removal Tool can remove it:
>>
>> http://www.microsoft.com/security/ma...e/default.mspx
>>

>
>
>
> --
> Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/


 
Reply With Quote
 
Tom
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-30-2009
That KB is NOT listed in the history. If it was part of the default build
of the laptop, could it not be considered an update? In that case, what
do I look for?

-tom

On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:59:09 -0700, John Barnett MVP
<> wrote:

> If the patch is 'not required' you probably already have it installed.
> Make a note of the KB number and check your update history (windows
> updates>view update history) to see if the fix has been applied.
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
THE C. [MS MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-01-2009
Tom, make sure your anti-virus (what ever your using) is up to date. If your
still not sure, do a scan of your system. Make it a great day.
--
Computer/Software Tech.


Charles Richmond
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/



"Tom" wrote:

> That KB is NOT listed in the history. If it was part of the default build
> of the laptop, could it not be considered an update? In that case, what
> do I look for?
>
> -tom
>
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:59:09 -0700, John Barnett MVP
> <> wrote:
>
> > If the patch is 'not required' you probably already have it installed.
> > Make a note of the KB number and check your update history (windows
> > updates>view update history) to see if the fix has been applied.
> >

>

 
Reply With Quote
 
John Barnett MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-01-2009
This is the link for the update I referred to:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sec.../MS08-067.mspx
Choose which operating system you are using and download the appropriate
update. If the update is already installed then a warning will appear on
your screen.

It wouldn't be part of the default build because, as far as I know, the
patch was released after Service pack 1. I've installed service pack 2 and
it still shows the KB patch in the update history window so maybe your
machine hasn't been patched?

You should make sure that your Anti Virus is up to date along with any
Malware/spyware software you have installed.


--

--
John Barnett MVP
Windows XP Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience

Web: http://www.winuser.co.uk
Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org
Web: http://www.silversurfer-guide.com

The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..


"Tom" <> wrote in message
news...
> That KB is NOT listed in the history. If it was part of the default build
> of the laptop, could it not be considered an update? In that case, what
> do I look for?
>
> -tom
>
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 08:59:09 -0700, John Barnett MVP
> <> wrote:
>
>> If the patch is 'not required' you probably already have it installed.
>> Make a note of the KB number and check your update history (windows
>> updates>view update history) to see if the fix has been applied.
>>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Vista and Conficker? FromTheRafters Windows Vista Security 0 03-30-2009 12:51 AM
Beware Conficker worm come April 1 Alias Windows Vista General Discussion 21 03-26-2009 08:55 PM
Conficker Worm Strikes Back With New Variant Alias Windows Vista General Discussion 5 03-15-2009 01:52 PM
New Conficker Expected April 1 Alias Windows Vista General Discussion 0 03-15-2009 10:37 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59