Re: Is Vista SP-2 relevant?

In article <h5snu5$tii$>, ewyatt_del_me_@excite.com
says...
> I went from the original Vista to Vista SP-1 and noticed considerable
> improvements. My system is very stable now.
>
> Is there a compelling reason to upgrade to SP-2? I don't need any
> Bluetooth, touchpad, Warp Drive, ray gun, or other out-of-world feature
> enhancements since my system is relatively simple. I always install Windows
> Updates (other than the SP-2 that's offered daily). I also don't feel there
> are any additional security features in SP-2, unless I'm mistaken.
>
> Comments? Is anyone there just happy with SP-1 and avoiding the possible
> problems with SP-2 installation? Or am I missing out on something really
> important? Thanks.

SP2 has been more or less benign. In my case, it cut my boot times
(power-on to login prompt) from roughly 2:15-2:30 to 1:05-1:15. Any
other changes seem to be more subtle.

--
If there is a no_junk in my address, please REMOVE it before replying!
All junk mail senders will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the
law!!
http://home.att.net/~andyross