Re: vulnerabilities in Mozilla Firefox greatly outnumbered those in Internet Explorer...

"Frank" <> wrote in message news:...
> The truth!
>
> http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Security/Security-Report-Ignites-Firefox-vs-Internet-Explorer-Feud/>

Hey moron, did you even read the article?
Probably not because you couldn't understand all those big words

From the article

Secunia reported six incidences in which Microsoft was publicly notified of
brwser vulnerabilities, two of which the security company labeled as "high"
or "moderate" in severity. Meanwhile, Mozilla experienced three such
occurrences, all of which Secunia labeled as "less critical" or "not
critical."

Microsoft took 110 days to issue patches for the two most serious flaws,
while it took Mozilla an average of 43 days to address its three flaws,
Secunia reported. One of the IE vulnerabilities remained open for 294 days
in 2008, according to the report.

Also;

Firefox v2.x had 10 advisories in 2008, 8 of which were rated as "Highly
Critical."

Firefox 3.x had 8 advisories in 2008, 6 of which were rated as "Highly
Critical."

Internet Explorer 6.x had 13 advisories in 2008, 7 of which were Highly
Critical, 1 was Extremely Critical, 2 were Moderately Critical.

Internet Explorer 7.x had 11 advisories in 2008, 6 were Highly Critical, 1
was Extremely Critical, and one was Moderately Critical.

So an ignorant fanboy like yourself sees a headline, doesn't read the
article or if you do read the article a can't understand what is being
reported. You have no clue, and you never do.
FANBOY