Re: WdfCoInstaller for Win XP/Vista/7

Sushma <> wrote:
>
>We are developed a USB driver for Win XP/Vista and Win 7. We are
>currently running WLK tests. We get a WLK test failure for Windows
>Vista while the same test pass on Win 7.
>
>The test is "Verify WDF Coinstaller Version for KMDF". I'm using co-
>installer wdfcoinstaller01009.dll with WDK 7600.16385 and WLK 1.4 for
>DTM testing. Here is the DTM log ouput.
>....
>C:\Windows\system32\wdfcoinstaller01009.dll
>Message 10/15/2009 2:25:27.530 AM TimeStamp is 1247528983 Size is
>1482752
>Error 10/15/2009 2:25:27.530 AM CoInstaller version doesn't match any
>of the RTM fre versions

>>> import time
>>> time.ctime(1247528983)
'Mon Jul 13 16:49:43 2009'

Neither the date stamp nor the file size matches any of the coinstallers
from the 7600 WDK. Can you go into a command shell and do
dir \WinDDK\7600.16385\redist\wdf\x86
and post the results?

C:\tmp>dir \DDK\7600\redist\wdf\x86
Volume in drive C has no label.
Volume Serial Number is 544E-EDE9

Directory of C:\DDK\7600\redist\wdf\x86

08/06/2009 09:14 PM <DIR> .
08/06/2009 09:14 PM <DIR> ..
07/14/2009 12:27 PM 1,461,992 WdfCoInstaller01009.dll
07/14/2009 10:49 AM 824,040 WdfCoInstaller01009_chk.dll
07/14/2009 12:21 PM 1,837,296 WUDFUpdate_01009.dll
07/14/2009 10:43 AM 1,128,176 WUDFUpdate_01009_chk.dll
4 File(s) 5,251,504 bytes
2 Dir(s) 26,659,393,536 bytes free
--
Tim Roberts,
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.

Sushma <> wrote:
>
>I ran the test individually by copying wdftester.exe in my client
>machine using command
>
>Wdftester.exe -kmdf -checkcoinstallerversion "usb\vid_1aed&pid_413a"
>"Windows Vista" KMDF.
>
>Here is the output log. I did not find the cause of problem. Can some
>one help me understand where the problem is.

Have you wiped the test machine clean and started over? **IF** your test
machine had somehow had one of the beta 1.9 co-installers installed on it,
your driver package would not overwrite them. That's the only thing I can
think of.

If that's not it, you'll have to open a support incident.
--
Tim Roberts,
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.

*How* clean?

DTM is really bad at "pointing the finger" at the wrong driver for these
kinds of violations. We're constantly getting bug reports from OEMs
where our driver is blamed for the installation of a beta 1.9 WDF by
some other driver package. If any driver on the system had just exactly
the wrong BETA 1.9 coinstaller in its package, it's possible that your
1.9 coinstaller is not getting installed.

diff the one in \windows\... against the one in your driver package. Are
they the same?

Sushma wrote:
> The client machine is clean before the driver package is installed.
>
> Do i need to install any kind of QFEs on DTM controller or DTM client
> for the test to pass. As i said earlier, i had installed the latest
> errata filters as well, but the test had still failed.
>
> Any comments or suggestion would be helpful.
>
> Regards,
> Sushma


--
Ray