Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > Re: Windows Vista and Seven are less customizable than XP.

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: Windows Vista and Seven are less customizable than XP.

 
 
+Bob+
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-06-2009
On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:36:00 +0300, TheBiG <> wrote:


>When Microsoft develop the Windows 95 user interface used psychologists
>and sociologists and studied the behavior of people: builders,
>housewives, children, engineers, developers, governments and others to
>develop the user interface and get the best performance and ease of use
>to them.
>
>What happened with Windows Vista?
>
>Microsoft think, please think.


What happened to Vista is that MS no longer has a clue. They form
"focus groups", ask them loaded questions to get the answers they
want, then ignore them anyway and do whatever they want to do.

They no longer have a clue about who their users are or what they need
(but they don't care, because they are the almighty MS and they _know_
what you need!)
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Charles W Davis
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-06-2009
Frank,

You might come to the conclusion that what Microsoft is doing is exactly
what the market research findings showed.
"Frank" <> wrote in message news:4a2ac28d$...
> +Bob+ wrote:
>> On Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:36:00 +0300, TheBiG <> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> When Microsoft develop the Windows 95 user interface used psychologists
>>> and sociologists and studied the behavior of people: builders,
>>> housewives, children, engineers, developers, governments and others to
>>> develop the user interface and get the best performance and ease of use
>>> to them.
>>>
>>> What happened with Windows Vista?
>>>
>>> Microsoft think, please think.

>>
>> What happened to Vista is that MS no longer has a clue. They form
>> "focus groups", ask them loaded questions to get the answers they
>> want, then ignore them anyway and do whatever they want to do.

>
> You've been a member of one of these "focus groups"?
>>
>> They no longer have a clue about who their users are or what they need
>> (but they don't care, because they are the almighty MS and they _know_
>> what you need!)

>
> So Microsoft spends millions on market research and then they totally
> ignore the findings?
> You think anyone, other than those who hate Microsoft (like you do)
> believe that statement?
>


 
Reply With Quote
 
Mark Levitski
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-06-2009
I have to agree with Frank on this one.
It's mind-boggling that I agreed w/Frank, but I am not a "hardwired" person
who sterotypes people.
I don't liek Frank's misunderstand the fact that Vista is unsuitable for
seriou sbusienss and is inferior to XP in thsi respect, HOWEVER that
Microsoft does spend lots of money on Marketing research and LISTENS to
customers is a fact.

They listened to my complains in the past, as much as I bashed MS regarding
Colors customization, failing Search by file contents, WinExplorer views
quirks and media-focused OS in general instead of real business, as opposed
to Fast, Customizable power of WinXp, I can't bash MS for not listening to
us.

Problem is American demographics has changed, we're a dumber country than
used to be in th egood old days of total world domination; except maybe
sharing it with Soviet Union where I was born!
The demographics tells you most customers are NOT using computers today for
what they were invented in 1940's (electronic, as of mechanical it dates
back to 17th century).

I.e. people ar enot solving systems of differential equations, analysis,
simulations, docs control, CAD design, even writing!!
Today Microsoft has no capacity to listen to US, technical people.
If we complain they listen, but they're afraid to go too far following our
advise to avoid alienating all those kids, housewives and other sub-educated
or less than intelligent public.
Thos epeople use computers to "rip DVD's" or play their retarded hiphop
music, that's it. That all they do, or sit for hours typing sexy messages
into Social websites.

Computers today are used more for Porn than for national security!
The most visited sites are porn, social networking, and other rubbish. I
remember when it was all academia, scientists, government, military, not
anymore.

OK so they will listen to some of my advices, specifically I got assurance
the Evil Color Schemes issue will be considered for fixing in Windows7.
That WindowsExplorer I was able to finally tame down to XP style performance
but views still choose random appearance, media-focused instead of generic
file-focused, is something we have to live with ufor awhile.

That Search I had to replace with FileLocator Pro, well I could afford $40.

I am not here to blast MS for the sake of ranting or blasting itself
I just want this product to cater MORE to people who invented computers.
That is engineerrs, scientists and technical people with BRAINS in general.

When I search for known existing stuff and Vista doesn't find, while XP
does, it infuriates me
We expect a BETTER product when qwe upgrade, what we got is soemthing better
in some aspects, and WORSE in others.
It just so happens that Vista's best features are of NO intetest to
technical people, this is why it makes me angry.

Who cares for Aero peaks, picks, and tricks?'
Children.
Do you sit at home starring into these shiny icosn, and semitransparent
windows just for the sake of enjoyment?
Hopefully not. This is rubbish for a busienss user.

I'd care much more for speed, realiability and CUSTOMIZATION.
I want th eability for each window to display whatevr background color I
choose, or all windows adhere to same policy, but WinLive PhotoGallery sets
white background which is an abomination to professional photographers.
Just one example. I am fixated on this color thing not because it's the
ONLY problem, i just dont have time to list lal the Vista's problems.

I use it because WinXP disk was lost and I had to reinstall everything due
to changing harddisk partitions, OK, now Frank you udneertsand why I use it>

Not because I wnated, but because disk was lost. I'd goback to XP any
moment.





 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Re: Windows Vista and Seven are less customizable than XP. Mark Levitski Windows Vista General Discussion 2 06-06-2009 10:52 PM
Re: Windows Vista and Seven are less customizable than XP. Mark Levitski Windows Vista General Discussion 0 06-06-2009 05:48 AM
Re: Windows Vista and Seven are less customizable than XP. Mark Levitski Windows Vista General Discussion 0 06-06-2009 05:11 AM
Re: Windows Vista and Seven are less customizable than XP. Mark Levitski Windows Vista General Discussion 0 06-06-2009 05:07 AM
Address Book customizable Owkmann Windows Vista Mail 5 01-10-2007 02:31 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59