Re: YES UBUNTU IS FASTER THAN VISTA CRAPISTA

I came from distant star wrote:
> YES UBUNTU IS FASTER THAN VISTA CRAPISTA
>
> Ubuntu score: 3367
> Vista **** score: 2838
>
> and hey.. if they tested this on a 1 gig machine.. ubuntu would still be
> flying.. wile Vista would be
> slow as a turtle with no legs.
>
> http://www.crn.com/software/21220125...NN2JVN?pgno=11
>
>
> Vista's Performance
>
> Vista's performance, widely criticized after its initial launch, has
> improved along with added driver support and application support.
> However, Microsoft still, almost laughably, maintains that Vista's
> minimum hardware requirement is 1 GB of memory. At 2 GB of memory,
> Geekbench benchmarking shows it lags the performance of Ubuntu 8.10.

Like posting a link to an obviously Anti-Vista site in this NG proves
anything other than you spend an inordinate amount of your time trash
talking Vista.

In a word... troll.

Lang