Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > Readboost 150x SD vs. 233x CF

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Readboost 150x SD vs. 233x CF

 
 
ttheissen@yahoo.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-16-2008
I'm debating between spending $10-15 for a 150x 2gb SD card versus
$20-25 dollars for a 233x 2 gb CF card for use with readyboost in
Vista.

Anyone have any thoughts about how much speed difference it would
make?

Thanks in advance.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
bmn
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-16-2008

Neither will make any difference. Chances are it will slow down you
computer. Readyboost will only improve the performance if you 512MB o
your computer

--
bmn
 
Reply With Quote
 
Ramone
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-16-2008
Why waste money on Readyboost? Buy more ram. There is no cost/benefit to
Readyboost.

Ramone

<> wrote in message
news:ecfba146-9f5e-448d-803b-...
> I'm debating between spending $10-15 for a 150x 2gb SD card versus
> $20-25 dollars for a 233x 2 gb CF card for use with readyboost in
> Vista.
>
> Anyone have any thoughts about how much speed difference it would
> make?
>
> Thanks in advance.



 
Reply With Quote
 
ttheissen@yahoo.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-16-2008
I've already got 3gb of RAM, and from what I've read, there is a
benefit to Readyboost. For $15-25 I think it's worth a try.
 
Reply With Quote
 
htuser
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-16-2008

bbbbbbbbbbbbbbb

--
htuse
Posted via http://www.vistaheads.co

 
Reply With Quote
 
Ramone
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-16-2008
From what I've read the benefit is just not there, especially if you already
have that much ram. If you are not already using all your ram you are
wasting your money, unless you have a camera. Most reports either say they
can't tell or that the boost is too minimal to be worth it. It's your money.

http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2008/0...schmeddyboost/

Ramone

<> wrote in message
news:8131975f-9470-4f2e-9a86-...
> I've already got 3gb of RAM, and from what I've read, there is a
> benefit to Readyboost. For $15-25 I think it's worth a try.



 
Reply With Quote
 
ttheissen@yahoo.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-16-2008
I think the Pitstop article is equivalent to a hit and run.
Readyboost is supposed to take some time to determine your program
usage pattern before it shows improvement. You shouldn't (and I
wouldn't) expect to plug it in and see your system suddenly come to
life.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Victek
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-16-2008
> I've already got 3gb of RAM, and from what I've read, there is a
> benefit to Readyboost. For $15-25 I think it's worth a try.
>
>

Since you may not see much benefit perhaps the way to decide is to choose
something that you have another use for? You may also want to confirm that
your computer's card reader supports ReadyBoost. Mine does not and I only
discovered it by trying to use SD memory for ReadyBoost - I received the
message "unsupported interface".

 
Reply With Quote
 
Ramone
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-16-2008

That was one of many similar articles. You've obviously already made up your
mind so go buy it. The only replies you have are that it's not worth it. So
why waste our time?

Ramone

<> wrote in message
news:8e33464f-e3db-47b2-93a1-...
>I think the Pitstop article is equivalent to a hit and run.
> Readyboost is supposed to take some time to determine your program
> usage pattern before it shows improvement. You shouldn't (and I
> wouldn't) expect to plug it in and see your system suddenly come to
> life.



 
Reply With Quote
 
Ramone
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-16-2008

If you insist on getting a readyboost capable device you should get one no
smaller than 3gb, 4gb would be better. A 1:1 ratio of readyboost to ram is
the minimum recommended with a 2.5:1 max. However, the highest Vista will
use is 4gb, so you'll have a 1.33 to 1 which is on the lower end.

Ramone

<> wrote in message
news:8e33464f-e3db-47b2-93a1-...
>I think the Pitstop article is equivalent to a hit and run.
> Readyboost is supposed to take some time to determine your program
> usage pattern before it shows improvement. You shouldn't (and I
> wouldn't) expect to plug it in and see your system suddenly come to
> life.



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Readboost unsupported interface Go123 Windows Vista Performance 3 08-26-2007 12:08 AM
Am I supposed to see more ram with a readboost drive inserted? jimmy fallon Windows Vista General Discussion 8 01-28-2007 10:21 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59