ReadyBoost...Should I Use It? If So, How Much?

Hi everyone.....I have Vista Home Premium x64 and am running 8 Gigs of
Ram. Will using ReadyBoost have any noticeable increase in performance?
If so, how much should I use? Would a Flash Drive be good enough for
that amount? Thanks......Michael:geek:


--
lordpuffer

You are wasting your time if you use Readyboost with your specs.
It was designed for Systems that only had 512MBs to 1024MBs RAM.
Once you get above 2-3G, no noticeable improvement.
--
Mad Mike


"lordpuffer" wrote:

>
> Hi everyone.....I have Vista Home Premium x64 and am running 8 Gigs of
> Ram. Will using ReadyBoost have any noticeable increase in performance?
> If so, how much should I use? Would a Flash Drive be good enough for
> that amount? Thanks......Michael:geek:
>
>
> --
> lordpuffer
>

I agree with Mick. It won't help at all.

SteveT

"[signius] ^ 2" <> wrote in message
news:494f795b$...
> the new beta of eboostr can use ram similarly to superfetch but FASTER
> than superfetch
>
> see graph comparison on this page (scroll down)
> http://www.eboostr.com/closedbeta/ve...nouncing-beta/
>
> have not tested it on 64 bit
>
> but you can download the beta and install it and see if you get any
> boosting.. by using the RAM
>
> the beta will last for some while.. by then you will know if it does any
> good for you
>
>
>
> "lordpuffer" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>>
>> Hi everyone.....I have Vista Home Premium x64 and am running 8 Gigs of
>> Ram. Will using ReadyBoost have any noticeable increase in performance?
>> If so, how much should I use? Would a Flash Drive be good enough for
>> that amount? Thanks......Michael:geek:
>>
>>
>> --
>> lordpuffer
>

NEVER install a beta piece of software of any type on a production machine.
You are only asking for trouble.

In article <>,
says...>
> But vista is beta quality in the first place...
> and YES by installing vista you are right....
> you are asking for trouble!
> lol
>
> Good advice chap!
>

So, why do you keep lying by your nick,
or even bother to read vista NG ? :-)

--
Poutnik

"i love vista" <> wrote in message
news:...
> But vista is beta quality in the first place...
>

If you want to know the truth: You have no clue how to work Vista so it
seems like beta to you. Everything you do is ****ed up. No wonder why you
bash Vista day after day.


> and YES by installing vista you are right.... you are asking for trouble!
> lol

No - YOU are asking for trouble by installing Vista. Since you don't have
the brains to use it, Vista is hard.

>
> Good advice chap!
>
>
>
> "LVTravel" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>>
>>
>> "[signius] ^ 2" <> wrote in message
>> news:494f795b$...
>>> the new beta of eboostr can use ram similarly to superfetch but FASTER
>>> than superfetch
>>>
>>> see graph comparison on this page (scroll down)
>>> http://www.eboostr.com/closedbeta/ve...nouncing-beta/
>>>
>>> have not tested it on 64 bit
>>>
>>> but you can download the beta and install it and see if you get any
>>> boosting.. by using the RAM
>>>
>>> the beta will last for some while.. by then you will know if it does any
>>> good for you
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "lordpuffer" <> wrote in message
>>> news:...
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone.....I have Vista Home Premium x64 and am running 8 Gigs of
>>>> Ram. Will using ReadyBoost have any noticeable increase in
>>>> performance?
>>>> If so, how much should I use? Would a Flash Drive be good enough for
>>>> that amount? Thanks......Michael:geek:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> lordpuffer
>>>
>>
>> NEVER install a beta piece of software of any type on a production
>> machine. You are only asking for trouble.
>