This is not Microsoft. It's a peer-to-peer public newsgroup "staffed" by
volunteers.
Why do you find it difficult to start a thread for whatever problem(s)
you're having?
Many problems that appear to be SP related and are in fact Vista General
issues.
You can also choose any of the following newsgroups:
microsoft.public.windows.media center
microsoft.public.internetexplorer.general
microsoft.public.windows.vista.administration_acco unts_passwords
microsoft.public.windows.vista.file_management
microsoft.public.windows.vista.games
microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_assessment
microsoft.public.windows.vista.hardware_devices
microsoft.public.windows.vista.installation_setup
microsoft.public.windows.vista.mail
microsoft.public.windows.vista.music_pictures_vide o
microsoft.public.windows.vista.networking_sharing
microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_mainten ance
microsoft.public.windows.vista.print_fax_scan
microsoft.public.windows.vista.security
-------
*Report back, please*
[When responding to posts, please include the post(s) you are replying to so
that others may learn and benefit from the issue]
[How to ask a question]
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
"Trevor" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> I disagree with all the responses I had about creating a Service Pack
> specific NG.
>
> I am not asking for a new Group for each SP for each OS. Jjust one
> group that relates to Service Pack related problems.
>
> I don't care if its, Microsoft.Public.Windows.Service-Packs
>
> or
>
> Microsoft.Windows.Vista.Service-Packs
>
> Whichever would work but the "General" topic is just not specific
> enough.
>
> I only found this "General" by accident. I certainly would NOT have
> come searching here for SP related issues had there not been so many
> here already.
>
> I formally request that Microsoft create a group that is on topic and
> related to the Extremely problematic SP release for Vista.
>
> I guess if this SP1 for Vista wasn't such a unique monster, I might
> not have requested this and would have accepted "Genera" as good
> enough.
>
> Thanks for the consideration.
> Respectfully,
>
> Trev