CWLee wrote:
>
> (Running Vista Ultimate 64-bit, SP-1, IE-7, classic mode.)
>
> I currently have an administrator account I'll call AAA.
> I currently have a user account I'll call BBB.
> (I also have a guest account, turned off, which can be ignored for this
> post.)
>
> On account AAA I have done extensive personalization (changing icons,
> removing some from desktop, etc.) which I want to retain. Account BBB
> is just as it was produced when I created it, and has rarely been used.
>
> Heretofore I have used account AAA all the time, and have not used
> account BBB. I have since been advised not to operate in an
> administrator's account (AAA) for security reasons, and that it is
> better to operate in a user account (such as my BBB).
>
> So, I'd like to reverse my two accounts, with BBB becoming the
> administrator account, and AAA becoming my regular user account. Here
> is how I propose doing that, and I'd like some feedback on any risks or
> problems foreseen with this scenario:
>
> Change account BBB to be an administrator account. Then change account
> AAA to be a user account.
Yes, that would work.
> Then change name of account AAA (temporarily)
> to CCC. Then change name of account BBB to AAA. Then change account
> CCC to BBB.
Here's where you lose me. Why go through all these contortions with
renaming accounts? There's no point, and remember that the user profile
folders will *NOT* be renamed when you do this, so you'll end up with
AAA's account settings, portion of the registry, and data files stored
where they originally were, in the user profile labeled BBB, and BBB's
files and settings stored in the user profile AAA. At some point down
the road, this is bound to lead to some confusion.
> When that process is complete I'd have account AAA with all
> my current personalizations, but as a user account; account BBB would be
> the plain and simple account, but the administrator account hardly ever
> used.
>
> Anyone see any problems with that approach?
Again, I'd forego the renaming of the accounts, but otherwise it's OK.
> If I do this will my
> security be better, in terms of protection from viruses?
>
You will be more secure, yes.
Routinely using a computer with administrative privileges is not
without some risk. You will be much more susceptible to some types of
malware, particularly adware and spyware. While using a computer with
limited privileges isn't the cure-all, silver bullet that some claim it
to be, any experienced IT professional will verify that doing so
definitely reduces that amount of damage and depth of penetration by the
malware. If you do happen to get infected/infested while running as an
administrator, the odds are much greater that any malware will be
extremely difficult, if not impossible, to remove with formating the
hard drive and starting anew. The intruding malware will have had the
same (administrative) privileges to all of the files on your hard drive
that you do.
A technically competent user who is aware of the risks and knows
how to take proper precautions can usually safely operate with
administrative privileges; I do so myself. But I certainly don't
recommend it for the average computer user.
--
Bruce Chambers
Help us help you:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin
Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell
The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has
killed a great many philosophers.
~ Denis Diderot