"gjb" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Many thanks, that will be very handing come migration time. I am still
> interested hearing peoples opinion and recommendations on the lifecycle
> aspect of this issue. 5 years seems a very short time to have to
> completely replace and migrate from a very expensive component of the
> information architecture as the SAN fabric.
I am a huge fan of planned obsolescence. We, as administrators, need to plan
the lifecycle of all of equipment including servers, desktops, operating
systems, and applications. The SAN is just one more piece of hardware.
Five years in IT is like 30 years in other industries. I like to think of IT
years as being similar to dog years. When I started in IT back in 1993, NT
3.1 first was introduced. 15 years later, I am thankful that there have been
huge changes. <G>
--
Russ Kaufmann,
MVP, MCSE: Messaging and Security, MCT, MCITP, MCTS and other stuff
ClusterHelp.com, a Microsoft Certified Gold Partner
Web
http://www.clusterhelp.com
Blog
http://msmvps.com/clusterhelp