On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:41:30 -0400, "Mr. Arnold" <>
wrote:
>Slinky wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:31:56 -0500, Ringmaster
>> <> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:26:19 -0400, Slinky
>>> <slinky_ISAT_newsguy_DOT-com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:09:03 -0700, oscar
>>>> <> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Press Windows Logo + F to get to the Search window. There, you will have
>>>>> access to the search tools which will perform the tasks that you have
>>>>> requested.
>>>>>
>>>>> More information on how to use Vista Search can be found at Start menu >
>>>>> Help and Support. Enter: Tips for finding files
>>>> Hmmm... I get a standard search window where, for the life of me, I
>>>> can't find an easy way to perform the same searches I did back in XP.
>>>> The "Tips for finding files" showed nothing but an illustration of the
>>>> same dumbed down search system that insists on using Microsoft's
>>>> indexing instead of allowing us to filter what and how we need to file
>>>> files, especially by specific document type or folder.
>>> The main change is searching in Vista is one dimensional. You can
>>> search for apples, but not search for apples then restrict to red
>>> apples. You can search by tags and other things but that presupposes
>>> you always know WHAT you'll be searching for before you begin.
>>>
>>> I just tried an experiment. I typed 'red' in the primary search field
>>> and I had "look in documents" turned on and I left it restricted to
>>> indexed items so it wouldn't take too long.
>>>
>>> Out of a total 35 hits first was a PDF file. The word 'red' doesn't
>>> appear, but several words that have red within other words does. The
>>> next 34 items ran into similar situations.
>>>
>>> Next I repeated the search this time including quotes "red". You would
>>> think Vista now would be smart enough to use some intelligence but all
>>> it accomplished was to show 9 hits again each having the 'red'
>>> somewhere in another word. There appeared to be no thyme or reason why
>>> some documents in found before it skipped even if the search hit on
>>> the string in the same embedded word.
>>
>> And what are document "tags"? For those very few people that use tags?
>> I'm also missing the search of document contents, e.g. find all .doc
>> files with the word "snuffles" in them. Impossible in Vista. I've
>> decided to buy software to do those searches now that I've discovered
>> that Vista gives you less ability to search than Windows 98...
>>
>> It's mind boggling how badly Microsoft has bungled the interface of
>> Vista, IE and Office that it leaves huge opportunities for other
>> companies to steal their thunder that we don't need to mention. The
>> ribbon was a good idea in practice but it never should have gotten out
>> of the first stage in testing.
>>
>If you want to know how to use Vista Search and its Advanced Features,
>then you're going to have to go to Google. Your problem is that you
>don't know how to use the Search, and therefore, you think it has less
>features than Win 9'x's search, when in fact, it has more features, if
>one knows how to use them.
>
><http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=how+to+use+Vista%27s+Advanced+Searc h&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=>
Well, it's good to know that my experience with DOS and C++ will come
in handy with Vista's powerful advanced search features.

We've come
a long way once Bill Gates stepped down... a return to typed commands!
I'm sure that will go over well with the people who needed that
hellish ribbon!
What is equally disturbing is that Microsoft seems to make you use
Google to find these features which are listed and explained by people
other than Microsoft or in some intuitive fashion where there is a
button to click for advanced search features in the search itself. It
would seem that Google is laughing at Microsoft on its way to the
bank.
Thanks for giving me the right search parameters to find out about
Vista's advanced search features.