Paul, Oh mighty MVP Windows Shill/User ;-) I'm afraid I disagree (strongly)
;-). Every possible attempt is made to insure backwards compatibility with
existing software. How many sales would MS make if their new operating
system was not compatible with anything? They wouldn't sell a copy. That
is a ridiculous proposition but I'm just trying to highlight the fact that
MS cooperates with software manufacturers early on in the development
process because more compatibility means more sales. However, a line must be
drawn somewhere since it would be counterproductive to spend a great deal of
time and money to insure compatibility with 20+ year old legacy apps. Even
so they usually build in a compatibility mode to accomplish the seemingly
impossible. I can't recall *any* OS that MS developed, going all the way
back to DOS V2, that didn't accommodate an extremely large percentage of
legacy apps. It's just good business. Some incompatibility problems are
simply code glitches which weren't intentional but just fell through the
cracks. I anticipate that some of those things will be fixed in SP1 and will
result in increased compatibility. Manufacturers will attempt to patch their
products incrementally to insure compatibility and they will do so with the
full cooperation of MS. Also good business. That's my story and I'm
stickin' to it :-)
"Paul Smith" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> "DanR" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Is SP1 expected to add Vista compatibility to some hardware and software
>> that is currently not Vista compatible?
>
> I doubt it. It isn't Microsoft's responsibility to get other people's
> stuff working.
>
> --
> Paul Smith,
> Yeovil, UK.
> Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User.
> http://www.dasmirnov.net/blog/
> http://www.windowsresource.net/
>
> *Remove nospam. to reply by e-mail*
>