(the wharf rat) wrote in news:fkljt5$o7e$1
@reader1.panix.com:
> In article <Xns9A0EEE2EEC80thisnthatadelphianet@216.196.97.14 2>,
> DanS <> wrote:
>>
>>I read the linked thread.
>
> Do you have an opinion on the idea of requiring privilege
> elevation via UAC for executables with certain strings in their
> filenames?
Sure.....
1) It could be a potential security risk.
2) It doesn't work right anyway. I don't know how many times here I've seen
people having problems installing something, because they didn't choose
'Run as Administrator' when starting the install package.