On Jul 27, 10:00 am, "Ian Betts" <igb...@talktalk.net> wrote:
>
> It has always been plain sailing.
>
> --
> Ian
>
No, it has not bee plain sailing at all, not on Win 95, not on 98, on
ME, 2000, XP and now Vista. I have used them all and "smooth sailing"
is not the word I would use. I mean, MS themselves in their own
Windows XP tweaking powertoy "TweakUI" has options for restoring these
folders and their icons. That's not because it has been smooth
sailing!
I recently moved tons of files from an external drive into a couple of
the special folders in Vista. After that the icons changed to generic
ones. I had to move all the files out again and recreate the special
folders using some cryptic formula I had to enter in the search field.
In my job we are required to have our documents on an encrypted drive
which gets hooked up to the computer when needed. I{n XP we had "My
Documents" set to a location on this external drive and it mostly
worked even when the drive was not connected. In Vista it doesn't work
at all. If you set your "Documents" folder to a location that doesn't
exist at boot the special folder disappears. All of this works fine
with special folders in OS X and in KDE and Gnome on Linux which we
also use in addition to Vista.
Since there's an option to move the locating of the special folders
the files should be moved and not copied when you change location.
Honestly, I have no clue what you are talking about. I hope you do!
One of the reasons I do not like about OS related forums and usegroups
is that there are people who won't accept that their OS has problems,
and that's what has made MS so dominant in the first place: People
accept all the crap and even deny it exists. On top of that they pay
for the next version it! I do it myself, but I know that I am partly
buying crap and try to do something about it when I can.
Frankly, Vista is the best crap I have ever used! But the special
folders do NOT work. Period!
//c