Super small windows coming after the Vista mega monster?

Microsoft knows that they blundered badly with the monster called vista..
too much bloat
and everything is slow.. and thats why they are trying to get windows on a
diet..
I dont understand why the vista fan boys dont acknowledge this.. oh perhaps
because they are stupid?
See links below for more info

http://geekswithblogs.net/WallabyFan...ster-Lets.aspx

and

http://reddevnews.com/news/article.a...torialsid=9172

non flammable on XP;563494 Wrote:
> Microsoft knows that they blundered badly with the monster called
> vista..
> too much bloat
> and everything is slow.. and thats why they are trying to get windows
> on a
> diet..
> I dont understand why the vista fan boys dont acknowledge this.. oh
> perhaps
> because they are stupid?
> See links below for more info
>
> 'Super small windows coming after the Vista mega monster? Let's hope
> it's the end of Bloatware?'
> (http://geekswithblogs.net/WallabyFan...ster-Lets.aspx)
>
> and
>
> 'Redmond Developer News'
> (http://reddevnews.com/news/article.a...torialsid=9172)

Wouldn't it be simpler for you to use something else, or are YOU
stupid? For the record, Vista runs just fine on my box, much moreso
than XPro ever did. If you can't afford to kit-out a new rig just stay
with last gen, and keep you whining to youself. BTW, I find it weird
that you'd take MS's word for anything in terms of the future,
considering how damaged you are by Vista.


--
Redviper

Q6600 (liquid), DFI Lanparty P35 T2R
EVGA ACS3 8800GTX
4x1gig GSkill,Xfi EG
4gig Corsair Readyboost
Antec Truepower 1000w
3xMemorex DL DVD burners
2x500gig SG (RAID 0)
1x300gig SG, 2x120gig SG (RAID 1)
1x500gig WD Mybook

non flammable on XP wrote:


....some bullsh*t about a blog he forgot to even read.
You know nothing at all about Win7 so stop the pretense!
Idiot!
Frank

In article <>,
<> wrote:
>
>I remember people saving the same about Windows 95.
>Decent hardware to run Win 95 was scarce and expensive.

I don't remember that at all. I did literally hundreds
of 3.11->95 upgrades and they were almost universally flawless, and
a big improvement as well. 95 will run on a 486/33 and 8 MB of ram,
weak even by 95 standards when most folks were at the Pentium level.

Contrast with Vista: core hardware upgrades are required for
most installs.

>Now after 3.11 on 6 FDD's that was bloat.

Lol. SunOS came on ummm 43? 45? floppies... The 13 or 14
you needed for 95 (or was it 16? whatever) seemed tiny :-) Anyway,
everyone had a cd so they could play Quake.

Hey numbnuts, you are the stupid one. Don't like Vista, go use Ubuntu

Just FYI

" non flammable on XP" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Microsoft knows that they blundered badly with the monster called vista..
> too much bloat
> and everything is slow.. and thats why they are trying to get windows on a
> diet..
> I dont understand why the vista fan boys dont acknowledge this.. oh
> perhaps because they are stupid?
> See links below for more info
>
> http://geekswithblogs.net/WallabyFan...ster-Lets.aspx
>
> and
>
> http://reddevnews.com/news/article.a...torialsid=9172
>
>
>
>

oh what have we here? a loud mouth knowitall know nothing!

Get lost twerp!


"Redviper" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> non flammable on XP;563494 Wrote:
>> Microsoft knows that they blundered badly with the monster called
>> vista..
>> too much bloat
>> and everything is slow.. and thats why they are trying to get windows
>> on a
>> diet..
>> I dont understand why the vista fan boys dont acknowledge this.. oh
>> perhaps
>> because they are stupid?
>> See links below for more info
>>
>> 'Super small windows coming after the Vista mega monster? Let's hope
>> it's the end of Bloatware?'
>> (http://geekswithblogs.net/WallabyFan...ster-Lets.aspx)
>>
>> and
>>
>> 'Redmond Developer News'
>> (http://reddevnews.com/news/article.a...torialsid=9172)
>
> Wouldn't it be simpler for you to use something else, or are YOU
> stupid? For the record, Vista runs just fine on my box, much moreso
> than XPro ever did. If you can't afford to kit-out a new rig just stay
> with last gen, and keep you whining to youself. BTW, I find it weird
> that you'd take MS's word for anything in terms of the future,
> considering how damaged you are by Vista.
>
>
> --
> Redviper
>
> Q6600 (liquid), DFI Lanparty P35 T2R
> EVGA ACS3 8800GTX
> 4x1gig GSkill,Xfi EG
> 4gig Corsair Readyboost
> Antec Truepower 1000w
> 3xMemorex DL DVD burners
> 2x500gig SG (RAID 0)
> 1x300gig SG, 2x120gig SG (RAID 1)
> 1x500gig WD Mybook

I am not against operating systems getting bigger..

I want them to get bigger but better...

not bigger and worse!

LOL vista has gotten 10 times bigger and actually nothing of real value has
been added..
rather a trillion things that are CRAP have been either changed or added and
good things removed..

vista is a disaster of design


"the wharf rat" <> wrote in message
news:flrjrv$2uj$...
> In article <>,
> <> wrote:
>>
>>I remember people saving the same about Windows 95.
>>Decent hardware to run Win 95 was scarce and expensive.
>
> I don't remember that at all. I did literally hundreds
> of 3.11->95 upgrades and they were almost universally flawless, and
> a big improvement as well. 95 will run on a 486/33 and 8 MB of ram,
> weak even by 95 standards when most folks were at the Pentium level.
>
> Contrast with Vista: core hardware upgrades are required for
> most installs.
>
>>Now after 3.11 on 6 FDD's that was bloat.
>
> Lol. SunOS came on ummm 43? 45? floppies... The 13 or 14
> you needed for 95 (or was it 16? whatever) seemed tiny :-) Anyway,
> everyone had a cd so they could play Quake.
>

non flammable on XP wrote:

....just more of bird brained bullsh*t about something (Vista) of which
he knows nothing.
Get lost you idiot!
Frank

non flammable on XP wrote:

> oh what have we here? a loud mouth knowitall know nothing!
>
> Get lost twerp!

Looking in the mirror huh?
Frank

" non flammable on XP" <> wrote in message
news:478169fa$...
> oh what have we here? a loud mouth knowitall know nothing!

Pot...kettle...black

Get the picture?

> Get lost twerp!

Would suggest you take your own advice.

--
The reason why worry kills more people than work is that more people worry
than work.
http://www.lockergnome.com/darksentinel
Undo the munge to reply by email