Is SyncToy 1.4 100% OK in Vista?

I ask because in Vista this aspect of SyncToy is driving me crazy: Even
though I've excluded the Recycle Bin in SyncToy's "Select Subfolders"
section (the entire Recycle Bin branch is deselected), if I do a "Preview"
on this task, SyncToy shows me that everything in Recycle Bin will be backed
up. In other words, it flatly ignores the exclusion. I later tried
deselecting some "normal" directories, and it had no problem with that, so
is it possible that SyncToy has a problem with special folders (in Vista, at
least)?

The only problems I have had with SyncToy have been with excessively long
paths, but I haven't tried what you're doing...

Still, its better than Briefcase by a LONG way [They reinvented the wheel
and came up with the log], and since MS didn't see fit to include Offline
Files for Basic/Home/HP users it's the only way unless you use a 3rd party
utility.

Personally, SyncToy probably *saved* my sanity (though that may be a matter
of debate) <g>

Have you tried creating a new sync pair from (and maybe getting rid of
existing SyncToy records) so it starts from scratch? Come to that, how did
you specify the folder pair in such a way that it included recycle in the
first place? (just rhetorical questions)

Julian

"Milhouse Van Houten" wrote:

> I ask because in Vista this aspect of SyncToy is driving me crazy: Even
> though I've excluded the Recycle Bin in SyncToy's "Select Subfolders"
> section (the entire Recycle Bin branch is deselected), if I do a "Preview"
> on this task, SyncToy shows me that everything in Recycle Bin will be backed
> up. In other words, it flatly ignores the exclusion. I later tried
> deselecting some "normal" directories, and it had no problem with that, so
> is it possible that SyncToy has a problem with special folders (in Vista, at
> least)?
>
>

That's a good question, since I'm sure it's not common, but I stumbled upon
this issue because I happen to have a small, dedicated data drive and I
wanted to operate upon the entire drive. So when setting up the sync pair
(which I have tried doing from scratch) I chose the root instead of only a
specific directory (of which there are many), which unfortunately includes
the Recycle Bin. That's how I came to try to exclude the Recycle Bin and
found that it looks like it can be done but doesn't actually work. I haven't
been able to try it in XP.

"Julian" <> wrote in message
news:E311FBF9-E7B8-414B-A747-...
> The only problems I have had with SyncToy have been with excessively long
> paths, but I haven't tried what you're doing...
>
> Still, its better than Briefcase by a LONG way [They reinvented the wheel
> and came up with the log], and since MS didn't see fit to include Offline
> Files for Basic/Home/HP users it's the only way unless you use a 3rd party
> utility.
>
> Personally, SyncToy probably *saved* my sanity (though that may be a
> matter
> of debate) <g>
>
> Have you tried creating a new sync pair from (and maybe getting rid of
> existing SyncToy records) so it starts from scratch? Come to that, how did
> you specify the folder pair in such a way that it included recycle in the
> first place? (just rhetorical questions)
>
> Julian
>
> "Milhouse Van Houten" wrote:
>
>> I ask because in Vista this aspect of SyncToy is driving me crazy: Even
>> though I've excluded the Recycle Bin in SyncToy's "Select Subfolders"
>> section (the entire Recycle Bin branch is deselected), if I do a
>> "Preview"
>> on this task, SyncToy shows me that everything in Recycle Bin will be
>> backed
>> up. In other words, it flatly ignores the exclusion. I later tried
>> deselecting some "normal" directories, and it had no problem with that,
>> so
>> is it possible that SyncToy has a problem with special folders (in Vista,
>> at
>> least)?
>>
>>

I've been using the new SyncToy with Vista Business. Pairs are between the
C: and an external drive. So far I've had no problems. All all operations
have worked flawlessly. Great little program. Hope you guys haven't found
a flaw.

"Milhouse Van Houten" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> That's a good question, since I'm sure it's not common, but I stumbled
> upon this issue because I happen to have a small, dedicated data drive and
> I wanted to operate upon the entire drive. So when setting up the sync
> pair (which I have tried doing from scratch) I chose the root instead of
> only a specific directory (of which there are many), which unfortunately
> includes the Recycle Bin. That's how I came to try to exclude the Recycle
> Bin and found that it looks like it can be done but doesn't actually work.
> I haven't been able to try it in XP.
>
> "Julian" <> wrote in message
> news:E311FBF9-E7B8-414B-A747-...
>> The only problems I have had with SyncToy have been with excessively long
>> paths, but I haven't tried what you're doing...
>>
>> Still, its better than Briefcase by a LONG way [They reinvented the wheel
>> and came up with the log], and since MS didn't see fit to include Offline
>> Files for Basic/Home/HP users it's the only way unless you use a 3rd
>> party
>> utility.
>>
>> Personally, SyncToy probably *saved* my sanity (though that may be a
>> matter
>> of debate) <g>
>>
>> Have you tried creating a new sync pair from (and maybe getting rid of
>> existing SyncToy records) so it starts from scratch? Come to that, how
>> did
>> you specify the folder pair in such a way that it included recycle in the
>> first place? (just rhetorical questions)
>>
>> Julian
>>
>> "Milhouse Van Houten" wrote:
>>
>>> I ask because in Vista this aspect of SyncToy is driving me crazy: Even
>>> though I've excluded the Recycle Bin in SyncToy's "Select Subfolders"
>>> section (the entire Recycle Bin branch is deselected), if I do a
>>> "Preview"
>>> on this task, SyncToy shows me that everything in Recycle Bin will be
>>> backed
>>> up. In other words, it flatly ignores the exclusion. I later tried
>>> deselecting some "normal" directories, and it had no problem with that,
>>> so
>>> is it possible that SyncToy has a problem with special folders (in
>>> Vista, at
>>> least)?
>>>
>>>
>

The root of C? If so, are you saying that you were able to deselect the
Recycle Bin and have it honor that? If so, does "Preview" suggest
otherwise?

"mikeS" <> wrote in message
news:...
> I've been using the new SyncToy with Vista Business. Pairs are between
> the C: and an external drive. So far I've had no problems. All all
> operations have worked flawlessly. Great little program. Hope you guys
> haven't found a flaw.
>
> "Milhouse Van Houten" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
>> That's a good question, since I'm sure it's not common, but I stumbled
>> upon this issue because I happen to have a small, dedicated data drive
>> and I wanted to operate upon the entire drive. So when setting up the
>> sync pair (which I have tried doing from scratch) I chose the root
>> instead of only a specific directory (of which there are many), which
>> unfortunately includes the Recycle Bin. That's how I came to try to
>> exclude the Recycle Bin and found that it looks like it can be done but
>> doesn't actually work. I haven't been able to try it in XP.
>>
>> "Julian" <> wrote in message
>> news:E311FBF9-E7B8-414B-A747-...
>>> The only problems I have had with SyncToy have been with excessively
>>> long
>>> paths, but I haven't tried what you're doing...
>>>
>>> Still, its better than Briefcase by a LONG way [They reinvented the
>>> wheel
>>> and came up with the log], and since MS didn't see fit to include
>>> Offline
>>> Files for Basic/Home/HP users it's the only way unless you use a 3rd
>>> party
>>> utility.
>>>
>>> Personally, SyncToy probably *saved* my sanity (though that may be a
>>> matter
>>> of debate) <g>
>>>
>>> Have you tried creating a new sync pair from (and maybe getting rid of
>>> existing SyncToy records) so it starts from scratch? Come to that, how
>>> did
>>> you specify the folder pair in such a way that it included recycle in
>>> the
>>> first place? (just rhetorical questions)
>>>
>>> Julian
>>>
>>> "Milhouse Van Houten" wrote:
>>>
>>>> I ask because in Vista this aspect of SyncToy is driving me crazy: Even
>>>> though I've excluded the Recycle Bin in SyncToy's "Select Subfolders"
>>>> section (the entire Recycle Bin branch is deselected), if I do a
>>>> "Preview"
>>>> on this task, SyncToy shows me that everything in Recycle Bin will be
>>>> backed
>>>> up. In other words, it flatly ignores the exclusion. I later tried
>>>> deselecting some "normal" directories, and it had no problem with that,
>>>> so
>>>> is it possible that SyncToy has a problem with special folders (in
>>>> Vista, at
>>>> least)?
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

No, sorry for not being clear. Just selected folders from the C: to an
external drive.

"Milhouse Van Houten" <> wrote in message
news:...
> The root of C? If so, are you saying that you were able to deselect the
> Recycle Bin and have it honor that? If so, does "Preview" suggest
> otherwise?
>
> "mikeS" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> I've been using the new SyncToy with Vista Business. Pairs are between
>> the C: and an external drive. So far I've had no problems. All all
>> operations have worked flawlessly. Great little program. Hope you guys
>> haven't found a flaw.
>>
>> "Milhouse Van Houten" <> wrote in message
>> news:%...
>>> That's a good question, since I'm sure it's not common, but I stumbled
>>> upon this issue because I happen to have a small, dedicated data drive
>>> and I wanted to operate upon the entire drive. So when setting up the
>>> sync pair (which I have tried doing from scratch) I chose the root
>>> instead of only a specific directory (of which there are many), which
>>> unfortunately includes the Recycle Bin. That's how I came to try to
>>> exclude the Recycle Bin and found that it looks like it can be done but
>>> doesn't actually work. I haven't been able to try it in XP.
>>>
>>> "Julian" <> wrote in message
>>> news:E311FBF9-E7B8-414B-A747-...
>>>> The only problems I have had with SyncToy have been with excessively
>>>> long
>>>> paths, but I haven't tried what you're doing...
>>>>
>>>> Still, its better than Briefcase by a LONG way [They reinvented the
>>>> wheel
>>>> and came up with the log], and since MS didn't see fit to include
>>>> Offline
>>>> Files for Basic/Home/HP users it's the only way unless you use a 3rd
>>>> party
>>>> utility.
>>>>
>>>> Personally, SyncToy probably *saved* my sanity (though that may be a
>>>> matter
>>>> of debate) <g>
>>>>
>>>> Have you tried creating a new sync pair from (and maybe getting rid of
>>>> existing SyncToy records) so it starts from scratch? Come to that, how
>>>> did
>>>> you specify the folder pair in such a way that it included recycle in
>>>> the
>>>> first place? (just rhetorical questions)
>>>>
>>>> Julian
>>>>
>>>> "Milhouse Van Houten" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I ask because in Vista this aspect of SyncToy is driving me crazy:
>>>>> Even
>>>>> though I've excluded the Recycle Bin in SyncToy's "Select Subfolders"
>>>>> section (the entire Recycle Bin branch is deselected), if I do a
>>>>> "Preview"
>>>>> on this task, SyncToy shows me that everything in Recycle Bin will be
>>>>> backed
>>>>> up. In other words, it flatly ignores the exclusion. I later tried
>>>>> deselecting some "normal" directories, and it had no problem with
>>>>> that, so
>>>>> is it possible that SyncToy has a problem with special folders (in
>>>>> Vista, at
>>>>> least)?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>