Hi Bert,
Here's the result:
Shadow Copy Storage association
For volume: (C

\\?\Volume{5592f142-e488-11db-86c4-806e6f6e6963}\
Shadow Copy Storage volume:
(C

\\?\Volume{5592f142-e488-11db-86c4-806e6f6e69
63}\
Used Shadow Copy Storage space: 13.859 GB
Allocated Shadow Copy Storage space: 15.433 GB
Maximum Shadow Copy Storage space: 43 GB
So, is the problem in the allocation? (Okay, I confess: I'm pretty new to
this. How does it work? You'd think 43 GB would be plenty!)
I don't think there are any "missing" (or deleted) restore points, since the
program keeps telling me specifically that storage space is insufficient.
Thanks so much for your help, Bert!
~ Kat
"Bert Kinney" wrote:
> Hi Kat,
>
> Is System Restore set to monitor any drives/partitions other than the now
> Vista is installed on?
>
> Run the following command from an elevated command prompt. Copy the results
> and post them here.
>
> vssadmin list shadowstorage
>
> Missing Restore Points/Shadow Copies in Windows Vista:
> http://bertk.mvps.org/html/missingrpv.html
>
> Regards,
> Bert Kinney MS-MVP Shell/User
> http://bertk.mvps.org
> Member: http://dts-l.org
>
> Kat wrote:
> > Since I got my new computer, Vista Home Premium has set only one restore
> > point— back in June. When I've tried to create a new one, I've been told
> > there's insufficient storage available. (Note: hard drive is 320 GB, more
> > than 80% free.)
> >
> > I resized shadow storage to three times the size of the single existing
> > shadow copy, & the command prompt window told me it was done successfully.
> > But I still can't create a new restore point—same old reason: insufficient
> > storage space.
> >
> > Worse yet, system restore using that single restore point from June has
> > consistently failed.
> >
> > Please, any ideas?
> >
> > ~ Kat
> >
> >
> > "EW" wrote:
> >
> >> Is there any way to set the maximum size of Vista Home Premium allotted
> >> restore point space? If so, I can't find it. I see no use for restore
> >> points from several months ago, if the system is running well, and there are
> >> recent points to rely on.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> EW
>