TaskManager & Shutting down is worse in Vista than in WinXP

"Stephen Fiore" <> wrote in message
news:...
> 1) TaskManager by Alt+Ctrl+Del does not start immediately as opposed to

<snip>

I can play this game as long as you can, moron.
--

Don't pick a fight with an old man.
If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.

1) TaskManager by Alt+Ctrl+Del does not start immediately as opposed to
WinXP.
Alt=Ctrl+Del first enters a BlueScreen menu and only then you can select
TaskManager from menu - an extra click over WinXP, what's the purpose of
this moronity?
Starting from Command prompt by 'taskmgr" [taskmgr.exe] is not an answer as
it requires even more typing.

2) Shutting down & Sleep requires an extra click (or more) over WinXP:
If you're a professional, you usually use keyboard heavily rather than slow
mouse:
In WinXP you Winkey+U+Enter and it shutsdown (or S for sleep).

In retarded Vista you have to go thru a dropdown menu.
I don't even mention breaking down good old Appearance applet in Control
panel (or rightclick on emapty desktop space-->properties) from tabbed menus
into separate applets.
Is that designed for morons who get sacred by Tabs? Or to waste more of our
time versus WinXP?

If XP wasn't broken & only requires ongoing Security updates, why was it
"fixed" with Vista rubbish? Not to mention Vista isn't bulletproof either,
security-wise.

"Stephen Fiore" <> wrote in message
news:...
> 1) TaskManager by Alt+Ctrl+Del does not start immediately as opposed to
> WinXP.

Vista is different from XP in case you did not know.

> Alt=Ctrl+Del first enters a BlueScreen menu and only then you can select
> TaskManager from menu - an extra click over WinXP, what's the purpose of
> this moronity?

If you look closely at that screen there are other options to choose from if
you Ctrl+Alt+Del.

> Starting from Command prompt by 'taskmgr" [taskmgr.exe] is not an answer
> as it requires even more typing.

Put a shortcut on your desktop, then its just a click away.
>
> 2) Shutting down & Sleep requires an extra click (or more) over WinXP:
> If you're a professional, you usually use keyboard heavily rather than
> slow mouse:
> In WinXP you Winkey+U+Enter and it shutsdown (or S for sleep)

One extra click or move? Must be in a real rush if that's a big deal.
>
> In retarded Vista you have to go thru a dropdown menu.
> I don't even mention breaking down good old Appearance applet in Control
> panel (or rightclick on emapty desktop space-->properties) from tabbed
> menus into separate applets.
> Is that designed for morons who get sacred by Tabs? Or to waste more of
> our time versus WinXP?

Once you get use to it you can navigate faster IMO.
>
> If XP wasn't broken & only requires ongoing Security updates, why was it
> "fixed" with Vista rubbish? Not to mention Vista isn't bulletproof
> either, security-wise.

>

"Mark Levitzki" <nospam_MetalBlade@nospam_Prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:...
> One extra click IS a BIG DEAL, because it's accumulating - extra click
> here, extra click there, and you end up admitting whoever designed these
> GUI "improvements" was not tjinking of business.
> But of ways to increase time spent on the computer, MORON

I bet you'd click your life away searching for your animal porn, though,
moron.
--

Don't pick a fight with an old man.
If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.

"Mark Levitzki" <nospam_MetalBlade@nospam_Prodigy.net> wrote in message
news:...
> because you're an unemployed MORON?

Am I sensing hostility? Poor orphaned moron. With each post you're losing
readers. With each post you're showing what an uneducated moron you are.
With each post you're giving moron's a bad name.

HTH
HAND
--

Don't pick a fight with an old man.
If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.

One extra click IS a BIG DEAL, because it's accumulating - extra click here,
extra click there, and you end up admitting whoever designed these GUI
"improvements" was not tjinking of business.
But of ways to increase time spent on the computer, MORON

because you're an unemployed MORON?