"AlanB" <> wrote in message
news:E783F42E-79F3-4632-B54A-...
> "AlanB" wrote:
>
>> .....
>> How do I recognise the AntiPhishing folder?
>
> To clarify this remark, I have now discovered that AntiPhishing is a
> subfolder of Temporary Internet Files BUT Windows hides all subfolders of the
> TIF folder from the User Account the folder belongs to (even when you show
> hidden files and don't hide operating system files).
>
> You can view these subfolders in another User Account or via a CMD window.
Good work. So did you look at the permissions of that subdirectory too? ; )
and is the acccount which created it the same as the one that uses it?
FWIW I only have one account involved but the only permission
I have on the AntiPhishing subdirectory is :C (change aka write) for that
one account. I wonder if others who are having the problem see that one
account as the (admin) account which did the install, instead of the the account
which needs to use it? Etc.
Another thing you could look at is testing Freudi's idea about the versions
of shdocvw.dll shlwapi.dll and browseui.dll. The most useful detail would
be the source file version (not just the module version), e.g. to know whether
you have the base version, the latest GDR version or the latest QFE version
as documented in the TechNet security bulletin. You can get that using a
module's properties page but, if you have the XP Support Tools installed,
the simplest way would be in a cmd window under the System32 directory:
For example:
<cmd_output>
F:\WINDOWS\system32>for %m in (shdocvw shlwapi browseui) do filever %m.dll /v | find "FileVersion"
F:\WINDOWS\system32>filever shdocvw.dll /v | find "FileVersion"
FileVersion 6.00.2900.2987 (xpsp.060901-0211)
F:\WINDOWS\system32>filever shlwapi.dll /v | find "FileVersion"
FileVersion 6.00.2900.2995 (xpsp.060913-0019)
F:\WINDOWS\system32>filever browseui.dll /v | find "FileVersion"
FileVersion 6.00.2900.2995 (xpsp.060913-0019)
</cmd_output>
Hint: copy and right-click paste the above for loop for the least amount
of typing or copying and pasting for you. ; )
I just installed KB931768, so Freudi's right: we don't get the full cumulative
update--neither the GDR nor the QFE version. But perhaps it's only that
those are just the old GDR source compiled en masse and there were no
significant changes in the actual binary code? Etc.
Robert
---
|