On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 11:05:40 +0200, Roland Schweiger wrote:
> "Magnus" schrieb
>> You have to remember that WLM is instinctively a cloud product, and so
>> you should be sending a cloud link to the photo, not the actual file
>> via
>> email.
>>
>> I regularly "send" 300-600MG videos in this manner.
> Well yes i do know that we are trimmed to send things like "photo
> mail" and i consider this type of cloud a good idea for "some"
> implementations
> e.g. holiday pictures which are sent to numerous eMail recipients.
>
> But when sending scanned documents for instance, i still prefer
> attatching them directly - i know that eMails become larger due to
> UUEncode (or Base64), but still - if there is only one recipient, why
> upload the attatchments to Windows Live?
I can't send even a 25 email from a Yahoo! account (allows 25 MB in email)
to my Sonic.net, LLC account (only allows 15 MB in email). Many email
services limit their users to just 10 MB, and some to just 5 MB. I don't
know of any email service provider offering larger than 25 MB for email
size. And that is total size, not attachment size. A brief description of an
attachment, plus a 12 MB attachment, and my ISP SMTP server will refuse to
handle it.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
|