Udungtu 8.10 ***WOW***

Another 27 patches were installed today on an operating system that was
released for public beta testing on October 30th.

Why should the public be doing their "beta" testing?

To recap:

first 89 patches

Then, another 14 patches

And now, 27 MORE patches.

All of this within the first month! Amazing - NOT.

Nothing like rushing an unfinished operating system out the door just so
the developer can say "we released it on time"!

none wrote:
> Another 27 patches were installed today on an operating system that was
> released for public beta testing on October 30th.
>
> Why should the public be doing their "beta" testing?
>
> To recap:
>
> first 89 patches
>
> Then, another 14 patches
>
> And now, 27 MORE patches.
>
> All of this within the first month! Amazing - NOT.
>
> Nothing like rushing an unfinished operating system out the door just so
> the developer can say "we released it on time"!
hello troll
this is not an ubuntu forum.

--
-- HAL07, Engineering Services, Norway

none wrote:
> Another 27 patches were installed today on an operating system that was
> released for public beta testing on October 30th.
>
> Why should the public be doing their "beta" testing?
>
> To recap:
>
> first 89 patches
>
> Then, another 14 patches
>
> And now, 27 MORE patches.
>
> All of this within the first month! Amazing - NOT.
>
> Nothing like rushing an unfinished operating system out the door just so
> the developer can say "we released it on time"!

Not all of them were patches but updates. Try installing XP without a
service pack and see how many you get. Do the same with Vista. Microsoft
recently released a patch for XP that they have known about for SEVEN
years. I prefer my patches/updates to come in a timely fashion, not
SEVEN years later. I installed Intrepid the day it came out and it was
great. After all the patches/updates, it's even better so you were saying?

Alias

HAL07 wrote:
> none wrote:
>> Another 27 patches were installed today on an operating system that
>> was released for public beta testing on October 30th.
>>
>> Why should the public be doing their "beta" testing?
>>
>> To recap:
>>
>> first 89 patches
>>
>> Then, another 14 patches
>>
>> And now, 27 MORE patches.
>>
>> All of this within the first month! Amazing - NOT.
>>
>> Nothing like rushing an unfinished operating system out the door just
>> so the developer can say "we released it on time"!
> hello troll
> this is not an ubuntu forum.
>

Hello MS fanboy.

This is a Vista GENERAL newsgroup.

Alias

Alias wrote:
> none wrote:
>> Another 27 patches were installed today on an operating system that
>> was released for public beta testing on October 30th.
>>
>> Why should the public be doing their "beta" testing?
>>
>> To recap:
>>
>> first 89 patches
>>
>> Then, another 14 patches
>>
>> And now, 27 MORE patches.
>>
>> All of this within the first month! Amazing - NOT.
>>
>> Nothing like rushing an unfinished operating system out the door just
>> so the developer can say "we released it on time"!
>
> Not all of them were patches but updates. Try installing XP without a
> service pack and see how many you get. Do the same with Vista. Microsoft
> recently released a patch for XP that they have known about for SEVEN
> years. I prefer my patches/updates to come in a timely fashion, not
> SEVEN years later. I installed Intrepid the day it came out and it was
> great. After all the patches/updates, it's even better so you were saying?
>
> Alias


You just don't get it - do you?

Vista is two years old - not 30 days old!!!

"Alias" <> wrote in message
news:ggoosh$26c$...
> HAL07 wrote:
>> none wrote:
>>> Another 27 patches were installed today on an operating system that was
>>> released for public beta testing on October 30th.
>>>
>>> Why should the public be doing their "beta" testing?
>>>
>>> To recap:
>>>
>>> first 89 patches
>>>
>>> Then, another 14 patches
>>>
>>> And now, 27 MORE patches.
>>>
>>> All of this within the first month! Amazing - NOT.
>>>
>>> Nothing like rushing an unfinished operating system out the door just so
>>> the developer can say "we released it on time"!
>> hello troll
>> this is not an ubuntu forum.
>>
>
> Hello MS fanboy.
>
> This is a Vista GENERAL newsgroup.
>
> Alias

Correct for discussion about VISTA not other operating systems.
--

Mike Brannigan

none wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> none wrote:
>>> Another 27 patches were installed today on an operating system that
>>> was released for public beta testing on October 30th.
>>>
>>> Why should the public be doing their "beta" testing?
>>>
>>> To recap:
>>>
>>> first 89 patches
>>>
>>> Then, another 14 patches
>>>
>>> And now, 27 MORE patches.
>>>
>>> All of this within the first month! Amazing - NOT.
>>>
>>> Nothing like rushing an unfinished operating system out the door just
>>> so the developer can say "we released it on time"!
>>
>> Not all of them were patches but updates. Try installing XP without a
>> service pack and see how many you get. Do the same with Vista.
>> Microsoft recently released a patch for XP that they have known about
>> for SEVEN years. I prefer my patches/updates to come in a timely
>> fashion, not SEVEN years later. I installed Intrepid the day it came
>> out and it was great. After all the patches/updates, it's even better
>> so you were saying?
>>
>> Alias
>
>
> You just don't get it - do you?
>
> Vista is two years old - not 30 days old!!!

And XP is even older. I prefer not to have to wait years for patches and
updates. You don't get it. Windows based machines are the ones in the
botnets that send you spam. Windows based machines get infected on a
regular basis. Ubuntu machines are NOT a part of botnets and never get
infected. Ergo, Ubuntu is doing something right about security and
Microsoft is playing catch up and never catches up.

You're really scraping the bottom of the barrel with this one. Why are
you so desperate to prove that Windows is better than Ubuntu?

Alias

Mike Brannigan wrote:
> "Alias" <> wrote in message
> news:ggoosh$26c$...
>> HAL07 wrote:
>>> none wrote:
>>>> Another 27 patches were installed today on an operating system that
>>>> was released for public beta testing on October 30th.
>>>>
>>>> Why should the public be doing their "beta" testing?
>>>>
>>>> To recap:
>>>>
>>>> first 89 patches
>>>>
>>>> Then, another 14 patches
>>>>
>>>> And now, 27 MORE patches.
>>>>
>>>> All of this within the first month! Amazing - NOT.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing like rushing an unfinished operating system out the door
>>>> just so the developer can say "we released it on time"!
>>> hello troll
>>> this is not an ubuntu forum.
>>>
>>
>> Hello MS fanboy.
>>
>> This is a Vista GENERAL newsgroup.
>>
>> Alias
>
> Correct for discussion about VISTA not other operating systems.

Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt wrong! Or do you need to know what the word
"general" means?

Alias

"none" <""richard\"@(none)"> wrote in message
news:...
> Another 27 patches were installed today on an operating system that was
> released for public beta testing on October 30th.
>
> Why should the public be doing their "beta" testing?
>
> To recap:
>
> first 89 patches
>
> Then, another 14 patches
>
> And now, 27 MORE patches.
>
> All of this within the first month! Amazing - NOT.

Umm and ALL these patches are for the OS - i.e. the LINUX KERNEL? I think
not.

"none" <""richard\"@(none)"> wrote in message
news:...
> Alias wrote:
>> none wrote:
>>> Another 27 patches were installed today on an operating system that was
>>> released for public beta testing on October 30th.
>>>
>>> Why should the public be doing their "beta" testing?
>>>
>>> To recap:
>>>
>>> first 89 patches
>>>
>>> Then, another 14 patches
>>>
>>> And now, 27 MORE patches.
>>>
>>> All of this within the first month! Amazing - NOT.
>>>
>>> Nothing like rushing an unfinished operating system out the door just so
>>> the developer can say "we released it on time"!
>>
>> Not all of them were patches but updates. Try installing XP without a
>> service pack and see how many you get. Do the same with Vista. Microsoft
>> recently released a patch for XP that they have known about for SEVEN
>> years. I prefer my patches/updates to come in a timely fashion, not SEVEN
>> years later. I installed Intrepid the day it came out and it was great.
>> After all the patches/updates, it's even better so you were saying?
>>
>> Alias
>
>
> You just don't get it - do you?

No - YOU don't get it. Differentiate between OPERATING SYSTEM and
APPLICATIONS. If you can that is....