UK Government Backs Open Source

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7910110.stm

Alias

Alias wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7910110.stm
>
> Alias


Silly UK Govt. They will figure out what a dumb move that was in a year
or so.

"Alias" <> wrote in message
news:go3uvg$6eu$...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7910110.stm
>
> Alias

That is good news if you are into the OpenSores concept but here in the
Vista group, NOBODY gives a RATS ASS about it. Why not post that crap in
the Ubuntu forum? Oh, you don't know where it is? GOOGLE it and maybe
you'll find it.

Remember Ubuntu is OpenSores and is FREE. Has been free since it came out.
NOBODY wants it. People would rather pay for Windows than use Ubuntu. That
should tell you all you need to know about OpenSores inferior products.

milt wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7910110.stm
>>
>> Alias
>
>
> Silly UK Govt. They will figure out what a dumb move that was in a year
> or so.

You mean MS will PERSUADE them it's a dumb move...

--
Asking a question?
Please tell us the version of the application you are asking about,
your OS, Service Pack level
and the FULL contents of any error message(s)

wrote:
> "Alias" <> wrote in message
> news:go3uvg$6eu$...
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7910110.stm
>>
>> Alias
>
> That is good news if you are into the OpenSores concept but here in the
> Vista group, NOBODY gives a RATS ASS about it. Why not post that crap in
> the Ubuntu forum? Oh, you don't know where it is? GOOGLE it and maybe
> you'll find it.

Nobody? You read the message so I guess you're just a nobody.

>
> Remember Ubuntu is OpenSores and is FREE.

False. OpenSores doesn't exist, sorry.

> Has been free since it came out.
> NOBODY wants it.

Liar.

> People would rather pay for Windows than use Ubuntu.

Liar.

> That
> should tell you all you need to know about OpenSores inferior products.

It tells me and everyone else that you're a liar. What's more, when
you're called on it, you lie again as if you were never called on it.
How stupid can you get?

Alias
>
>

milt wrote:
> Alias wrote:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7910110.stm
>>
>> Alias
>
>
> Silly UK Govt. They will figure out what a dumb move that was in a year
> or so.

Might take awhile for them to get over saving the 800 million pounds.

Alias

"Alias" <> wrote in message
news:go40g2$rng$...
> wrote:
>> "Alias" <> wrote in message
>> news:go3uvg$6eu$...
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7910110.stm
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>> That is good news if you are into the OpenSores concept but here in the
>> Vista group, NOBODY gives a RATS ASS about it. Why not post that crap in
>> the Ubuntu forum? Oh, you don't know where it is? GOOGLE it and maybe
>> you'll find it.
>
> Nobody? You read the message so I guess you're just a nobody.
>

I said that NOBODY gives a RATS ASS about the OpenSores concept. You need
reading comprehension. Oops. you are probably stoned again.


>>
>> Remember Ubuntu is OpenSores and is FREE.
>
> False. OpenSores doesn't exist, sorry.

OpenSores = Open Source - Same thing.


>
>> Has been free since it came out. NOBODY wants it.
>
> Liar.

It is true.
>
>> People would rather pay for Windows than use Ubuntu.
>
> Liar.
>
>> That should tell you all you need to know about OpenSores inferior
>> products.
>
> It tells me and everyone else that you're a liar. What's more, when you're
> called on it, you lie again as if you were never called on it. How stupid
> can you get?
>
> Alias
>>

Gordon wrote:
> milt wrote:
>> Alias wrote:
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7910110.stm
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>>
>> Silly UK Govt. They will figure out what a dumb move that was in a
>> year or so.
>
> You mean MS will PERSUADE them it's a dumb move...
>

Nope, MS won't have to persuade them. They'll have some thing they will
want to do,that they have been doing for years with their Windows
setups... and find it can't be done because there is no open source
equivalent to what they been doing. Either that or they will find one
but it will be buggy and being open source, it will be fixed whenever
someone feels like fixing it. I mean really, its their hobby, they don't
make any money on it so they will get to it when they get to it.

Then they will figure out they really didn't save anything at all.

The Frankenmonster rose from his septic tank and wrote:

> More of your lies? You area known and admitted liar, atheist and linux
> troll.
> I just love watching you getting your stupid ignorant ass kicked in here
> everyday by everyone!

milt wrote:
> Gordon wrote:
>> milt wrote:
>>> Alias wrote:
>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7910110.stm
>>>>
>>>> Alias
>>>
>>>
>>> Silly UK Govt. They will figure out what a dumb move that was in a
>>> year or so.
>>
>> You mean MS will PERSUADE them it's a dumb move...
>>
>
> Nope, MS won't have to persuade them.

Oh yes they will. They'll offer to re-licence at some ludicrously cheap
cost....


--
Asking a question?
Please tell us the version of the application you are asking about,
your OS, Service Pack level
and the FULL contents of any error message(s)