update now or wait for sp1?

is it advisible to update windows now or wait for sp1?

Windows Vista SP1 in general is really just a collection of updates that
have been released for the operating system since November 2006. There
really is no need in waiting for SP1 to upgrade to Windows Vista, go ahead
now.
--
Andre
Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
My Vista Quickstart Guide:
http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
"Neerav" <> wrote in message
news:397A0DA4-3CC2-4163-82FC-...
> is it advisible to update windows now or wait for sp1?

Vista offers nothing better than XP and has more negatives than positives.
If you want to experiment with Vista install it as a dual boot.
If you install Vista as an upgrade you cannot go back to XP, and you
probably will want to.

Neerav wrote:
> is it advisible to update windows now or wait for sp1?

Wait for SP2.

--
Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group -
Submit your nomination at the link below:
http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html

View nominations already submitted:
http://htmlgear.tripod.com/guest/con...dom&i=1&a=view

"Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on
free speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the
creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer
rights in the digital age are not frivolous."
- Maura Corbett

flambe wrote:
> Vista offers nothing better than XP and has more negatives than positives.

Well that's simply not true. You need to stop lying about Vista, which
is something it appears you know nothing at all about.

> If you want to experiment with Vista install it as a dual boot.
> If you install Vista as an upgrade you cannot go back to XP, and you
> probably will want to.

More of your misleading lies?
Give it up!
Frank

well i already am on vista and i dont feel like going back to xp. i havent
experienced any negatives so far! it installed faster, the look and feel is
awesome, applications load faster, search feature is kick a$$, in built
programs are more user friendly, networking is easier, the side bar is a
great tool, it boots way faster than xp. the only thing that i think could
have been better was the defragmenter.

not to mention the impoved start menu with search, ie7, wmp11 (wow!), media
center and photo gallery.

Neerav

"flambe" <> wrote in message
news:JYEej.35767$. net...
> Vista offers nothing better than XP and has more negatives than positives.
> If you want to experiment with Vista install it as a dual boot.
> If you install Vista as an upgrade you cannot go back to XP, and you
> probably will want to.
>

sp2!! i dont see any sp1 yet!
"The poster formerly known as 'The Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy'"
<> wrote in message news:flf71q$b4f$...
> Neerav wrote:
>> is it advisible to update windows now or wait for sp1?
>
> Wait for SP2.
>
> --
> Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group -
> Submit your nomination at the link below:
> http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html
>
> View nominations already submitted:
> http://htmlgear.tripod.com/guest/con...dom&i=1&a=view
>
> "Fair use is not merely a nice concept--it is a federal law based on free
> speech rights under the First Amendment and is a cornerstone of the
> creativity and innovation that is a hallmark of this country. Consumer
> rights in the digital age are not frivolous."
> - Maura Corbett

Explanation of the Defragmenter in Vista, its actually an improvement:
http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/arc...g-is-cool.aspx
--
Andre
Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
My Vista Quickstart Guide:
http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
"Neerav" <> wrote in message
newsC843AED-1B2F-4BDF-AF32-...
> well i already am on vista and i dont feel like going back to xp. i havent
> experienced any negatives so far! it installed faster, the look and feel
> is awesome, applications load faster, search feature is kick a$$, in built
> programs are more user friendly, networking is easier, the side bar is a
> great tool, it boots way faster than xp. the only thing that i think could
> have been better was the defragmenter.
>
> not to mention the impoved start menu with search, ie7, wmp11 (wow!),
> media center and photo gallery.
>
> Neerav
>
> "flambe" <> wrote in message
> news:JYEej.35767$. net...
>> Vista offers nothing better than XP and has more negatives than
>> positives.
>> If you want to experiment with Vista install it as a dual boot.
>> If you install Vista as an upgrade you cannot go back to XP, and you
>> probably will want to.
>>
>

He is right and you are wrong franky poo..

if you like vista it shows you know sh*t about it! LOL

Any educated computer user would see right away that its horrid and stupid.


"Frank" <> wrote in message
news:...
> flambe wrote:
>> Vista offers nothing better than XP and has more negatives than
>> positives.
>
> Well that's simply not true. You need to stop lying about Vista, which is
> something it appears you know nothing at all about.
>
>> If you want to experiment with Vista install it as a dual boot.
>> If you install Vista as an upgrade you cannot go back to XP, and you
>> probably will want to.
>
> More of your misleading lies?
> Give it up!
> Frank
>
>
>

i certainly dont doubt the way vista defrag works and i'm sure it would be
better than xp. but what i say is there could be a graphical representation
on what is happening like in xp.

Neerav

"Andre Da Costa[ActiveWin]" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> Explanation of the Defragmenter in Vista, its actually an improvement:
> http://blogs.technet.com/filecab/arc...g-is-cool.aspx
> --
> Andre
> Blog: http://adacosta.spaces.live.com
> My Vista Quickstart Guide:
> http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog...3DB!9709.entry
> "Neerav" <> wrote in message
> newsC843AED-1B2F-4BDF-AF32-...
>> well i already am on vista and i dont feel like going back to xp. i
>> havent experienced any negatives so far! it installed faster, the look
>> and feel is awesome, applications load faster, search feature is kick
>> a$$, in built programs are more user friendly, networking is easier, the
>> side bar is a great tool, it boots way faster than xp. the only thing
>> that i think could have been better was the defragmenter.
>>
>> not to mention the impoved start menu with search, ie7, wmp11 (wow!),
>> media center and photo gallery.
>>
>> Neerav
>>
>> "flambe" <> wrote in message
>> news:JYEej.35767$. net...
>>> Vista offers nothing better than XP and has more negatives than
>>> positives.
>>> If you want to experiment with Vista install it as a dual boot.
>>> If you install Vista as an upgrade you cannot go back to XP, and you
>>> probably will want to.
>>>
>>
>
>