Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > USB 2.0 Transfer Issues with Vista & External Drive

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

USB 2.0 Transfer Issues with Vista & External Drive

 
 
Fyvush Finkel
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-04-2007
I just purchased a Seagate FreeAgent external hard drive with USB 2.0. When
I hook it up to my system (nvidia 680sli motherboard) the transfer speed is
only 28.5-29 MBs. The documentation that comes with the external drive says
that USB 2.0 can transfer at a rate of 400 MBs.

Why the extreme discrepency between what is written on the docs and actual
use with Vista Ultimate? My machine has 4GB of RAM, a 2.4 GHz dual core
processor, so it is fast enuf. Anyone have an explanation?

Thanks


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
PaulB
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-05-2007
Remember that transfer rates depend on the entire path of transfer. Disk
access time, bus speeds etc. The intent of USB 2.0 is not to be the limiting
factor.
--
Paul


"Fyvush Finkel" wrote:

> I just purchased a Seagate FreeAgent external hard drive with USB 2.0. When
> I hook it up to my system (nvidia 680sli motherboard) the transfer speed is
> only 28.5-29 MBs. The documentation that comes with the external drive says
> that USB 2.0 can transfer at a rate of 400 MBs.
>
> Why the extreme discrepency between what is written on the docs and actual
> use with Vista Ultimate? My machine has 4GB of RAM, a 2.4 GHz dual core
> processor, so it is fast enuf. Anyone have an explanation?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Fyvush Finkel
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-05-2007
The motheboard has an 800MHz FSB. The SATA drives have at least a 100MBs
transfer rate and the bus is extremly fast. I can't believe they are
restricted to 29MBs when data from the SATA drives transfer across the same
bus at many times the speed of the USB device. What else could be the
problem?


"PaulB" <> wrote in message
news:AD28060C-8B38-4BB0-ACF1-...
> Remember that transfer rates depend on the entire path of transfer. Disk
> access time, bus speeds etc. The intent of USB 2.0 is not to be the
> limiting
> factor.
> --
> Paul
>
>
> "Fyvush Finkel" wrote:
>
>> I just purchased a Seagate FreeAgent external hard drive with USB 2.0.
>> When
>> I hook it up to my system (nvidia 680sli motherboard) the transfer speed
>> is
>> only 28.5-29 MBs. The documentation that comes with the external drive
>> says
>> that USB 2.0 can transfer at a rate of 400 MBs.
>>
>> Why the extreme discrepency between what is written on the docs and
>> actual
>> use with Vista Ultimate? My machine has 4GB of RAM, a 2.4 GHz dual core
>> processor, so it is fast enuf. Anyone have an explanation?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>


 
Reply With Quote
 
R. McCarty
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-05-2007
USB external drives will likely never exceed a sustained throughput
beyond 30.0 Megabytes per second. Note the 480 Mega is rated
in "Bits" not Bytes. For true external performance similar to internal
drives you'd need to use an External or eSATA drive. External USB
drives are convenient, but not known for their speed.

"Fyvush Finkel" <> wrote in message
news:...
> The motheboard has an 800MHz FSB. The SATA drives have at least a 100MBs
> transfer rate and the bus is extremly fast. I can't believe they are
> restricted to 29MBs when data from the SATA drives transfer across the
> same bus at many times the speed of the USB device. What else could be
> the problem?
>
>
> "PaulB" <> wrote in message
> news:AD28060C-8B38-4BB0-ACF1-...
>> Remember that transfer rates depend on the entire path of transfer. Disk
>> access time, bus speeds etc. The intent of USB 2.0 is not to be the
>> limiting
>> factor.
>> --
>> Paul
>>
>>
>> "Fyvush Finkel" wrote:
>>
>>> I just purchased a Seagate FreeAgent external hard drive with USB 2.0.
>>> When
>>> I hook it up to my system (nvidia 680sli motherboard) the transfer speed
>>> is
>>> only 28.5-29 MBs. The documentation that comes with the external drive
>>> says
>>> that USB 2.0 can transfer at a rate of 400 MBs.
>>>
>>> Why the extreme discrepency between what is written on the docs and
>>> actual
>>> use with Vista Ultimate? My machine has 4GB of RAM, a 2.4 GHz dual
>>> core
>>> processor, so it is fast enuf. Anyone have an explanation?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>>

>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Fyvush Finkel
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-05-2007
Thanks for the clarification. That makes more sense and I now I think I'll
return it for an eSATA drive. One question. How would I connect the eSATA
drive to the system?


"R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:...
> USB external drives will likely never exceed a sustained throughput
> beyond 30.0 Megabytes per second. Note the 480 Mega is rated
> in "Bits" not Bytes. For true external performance similar to internal
> drives you'd need to use an External or eSATA drive. External USB
> drives are convenient, but not known for their speed.
>
> "Fyvush Finkel" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> The motheboard has an 800MHz FSB. The SATA drives have at least a 100MBs
>> transfer rate and the bus is extremly fast. I can't believe they are
>> restricted to 29MBs when data from the SATA drives transfer across the
>> same bus at many times the speed of the USB device. What else could be
>> the problem?
>>
>>
>> "PaulB" <> wrote in message
>> news:AD28060C-8B38-4BB0-ACF1-...
>>> Remember that transfer rates depend on the entire path of transfer. Disk
>>> access time, bus speeds etc. The intent of USB 2.0 is not to be the
>>> limiting
>>> factor.
>>> --
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> "Fyvush Finkel" wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just purchased a Seagate FreeAgent external hard drive with USB 2.0.
>>>> When
>>>> I hook it up to my system (nvidia 680sli motherboard) the transfer
>>>> speed is
>>>> only 28.5-29 MBs. The documentation that comes with the external drive
>>>> says
>>>> that USB 2.0 can transfer at a rate of 400 MBs.
>>>>
>>>> Why the extreme discrepency between what is written on the docs and
>>>> actual
>>>> use with Vista Ultimate? My machine has 4GB of RAM, a 2.4 GHz dual
>>>> core
>>>> processor, so it is fast enuf. Anyone have an explanation?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

>>

>
>


 
Reply With Quote
 
R. McCarty
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-05-2007
I use an AcomData kit. It comes with a PCI card, External drive
(WDC 250-Gigabyte) and a cable. Because it's served from the
PCI bus it's speed gets caped at around 65 Megabytes a second.
I bought my kit from CompUSA, but they've closed or are closing
a large number of their stores.
Here's a link to the manufacturer's product page:
http://www.acomdata.com/hdp/fs.html
There are all kinds of other solutions, Tiger Direct has an Outlet
store where I live and they sell SATA-II expansion cards and
enclosures that you can build your own kit. ( Picking the drive to
use with it.) Many new motherboards come with a eSATA socket
on the pack panel to use an external drive.

"Fyvush Finkel" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Thanks for the clarification. That makes more sense and I now I think
> I'll return it for an eSATA drive. One question. How would I connect the
> eSATA drive to the system?
>
>
> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:...
>> USB external drives will likely never exceed a sustained throughput
>> beyond 30.0 Megabytes per second. Note the 480 Mega is rated
>> in "Bits" not Bytes. For true external performance similar to internal
>> drives you'd need to use an External or eSATA drive. External USB
>> drives are convenient, but not known for their speed.
>>
>> "Fyvush Finkel" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> The motheboard has an 800MHz FSB. The SATA drives have at least a
>>> 100MBs transfer rate and the bus is extremly fast. I can't believe they
>>> are restricted to 29MBs when data from the SATA drives transfer across
>>> the same bus at many times the speed of the USB device. What else could
>>> be the problem?
>>>
>>>
>>> "PaulB" <> wrote in message
>>> news:AD28060C-8B38-4BB0-ACF1-...
>>>> Remember that transfer rates depend on the entire path of transfer.
>>>> Disk
>>>> access time, bus speeds etc. The intent of USB 2.0 is not to be the
>>>> limiting
>>>> factor.
>>>> --
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Fyvush Finkel" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I just purchased a Seagate FreeAgent external hard drive with USB 2.0.
>>>>> When
>>>>> I hook it up to my system (nvidia 680sli motherboard) the transfer
>>>>> speed is
>>>>> only 28.5-29 MBs. The documentation that comes with the external
>>>>> drive says
>>>>> that USB 2.0 can transfer at a rate of 400 MBs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why the extreme discrepency between what is written on the docs and
>>>>> actual
>>>>> use with Vista Ultimate? My machine has 4GB of RAM, a 2.4 GHz dual
>>>>> core
>>>>> processor, so it is fast enuf. Anyone have an explanation?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>

>>
>>

>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
using external drive for easy transfer Pat Windows Vista General Discussion 1 01-15-2008 02:01 PM
Data transfer using external floppy disk drive zzooman Windows Vista General Discussion 5 12-31-2007 08:54 PM
External USB drive issues RJF Windows Vista General Discussion 9 03-23-2007 05:56 PM
Easy Transfer from external hard drive to new computer ss8wjl@ast.lmco.com Windows Vista Installation 1 03-16-2007 05:07 AM
Slow IEEE 1394 FIrewire external drive transfer krypticide Windows Vista Hardware 0 12-16-2006 04:39 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59