Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > What is a Useful Idiot?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

What is a Useful Idiot?

 
 
Ringmaster
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-29-2008
Glad you asked. It is easy to spot these morons.

1. They're ALWAYS Microsoft apologists.
2. They always have some ready excuse for Vista problems.
3. They often post under multiple names.
4. They attack anything and everything to do with Linux.
5. They use vulgar, crude, inflammatory language.
6. They're control freaks, net cops, trolls, self-important jerks.
7. They often post under another poster's name, but fool nobody.
8. They have no lives outside this goofy newsgroup and hang out in the
bushes waiting to pounce.

What motives these morons to act like they do? Good question. I can
only guess. One theme that runs through all their posts is obviously
they can't stand to see anything factual about Microsoft or Vista
being discussed that in any way could be viewed as critical. They
foolishly think it is their job to attack the poster providing factual
information or reporting any problems. In other words these morons
interfere with the very purpose of this newsgroup... to discuss what
is wrong with Vista and find work arounds, including alternatives.

Why would any Bozo do that in what is suppose to be a discussion
group? Seems these morons feel this newsgroup is suppose to be only a
Microsoft Cheerleader's Club. Odd, if everybody has the same opinion
or view on every topic then there is no discussion, the very purpose
of any Usenet newsgroup.

Have you noticed every last one of these morons that complains and
bitches about another poster is by far a bigger jackass himself? Yea,
I noticed. That is why I poke a stick at the buffoons knowing for sure
they will put on a show. After all, it is my job as Ringmaster to
provide entertainment and I have a never ending supply of dummies I
can make dance simply by snapping my fingers.

Enjoy the Useful Idiots, there purpose is to entertain the rest of us
by showing us day after day how stupid they will act. They never
disappoint. They never stop, and the entertainment is free.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Frank
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-29-2008
Here is the very best example of a "Useful Idiot"!

By PowerUser:
"Licentious. Obnoxious. Anti-democratic. In case you can't tell, I'm
making a direct reference to Mr. Adam Albright. Before I launch into my
main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Failure to
recognize this salient point will result in Adam's getting free reign to
enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth, and (2) as a result of
that, my observations are perhaps unique. Now that you know where I
stand on those issues, I can safely say that wily cutthroats like Adam
are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may
be, Adam acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is
astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. He truly believes that he
defends the real needs of the working class. It is just such
counter-productive megalomania, muddleheaded egoism, and intellectual
aberrancy that stirs Adam to carve out space in the mainstream for
ungrateful politics.

I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that
Adam and his gofers are wolves in sheep's clothing who will create
profound emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue
eventually, and the second is that the justification he gave for seeking
to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of
their character was one of the most addlepated justifications I've ever
heard. It was so addlepated, in fact, that I will not repeat it here.
Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite
clearly: Adam keeps telling everyone within earshot that honesty and
responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. I'm
guessing that Adam read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More
reliable sources generally indicate that he isn't as smart as he thinks
he is. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to
Adam. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll
find that if he had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit
that he has no evidence or examples to back up his point. Still, I
recommend you check out some of his commentaries and draw your own
conclusions on the matter. Adam teaches workshops on clericalism.
Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist
re-education camp. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
repeat it. Of course, if Adam had learned anything from history, he'd
know that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that
proposes that we ought to worship feckless mountebanks as folk heroes.
It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.


We no longer have the luxury of indulging in universalist, altruistic
principles that, no matter how noble they may appear, have enabled the
most self-satisfied spouters I've ever seen to compose paeans to
irrationalism. Didn't Adam tell his comrades that he wants to make
people suspicious of those who speak the truth? Did he first give any
thought to what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is
ridiculous -- as ridiculous as his gormless platitudes. None but the
grotesque can deny that he says that the sun rises just for him. What he
means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to threaten the
existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet. I understand
that I become truly impatient with people who refuse to recognize the
key role that he is playing in the destruction of our civilization, but
from the fog and mist of his disquisitions rises the leering grimace of
nihilism. An equal but opposite observation is that I and Adam part
company when it comes to the issue of quislingism. He feels that
those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness,
should be shunned, should starve, while I suspect that he needs to stop
living in a fool's paradise. But there's the rub; his idea of mutinous
autism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of
hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of
an irascible blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a doctrinaire and pagan
religion that incites its worshipers to an infernal frenzy and then
prompts them to precipitate riots.


Adam does not merely undermine the current world order. He does so
consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. His undertakings
were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing
for the "innocents". Rather, someone has been giving Adam's brain a very
thorough washing, and now Adam is trying to do the same to us. Several
things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement
of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something
to the effect of how he is a refined gentleman with the soundest
education and morals you can imagine. Forgive me for boring you with all
the gory details, but Adam's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least
discerning among us can see right through it.


It's easy to tell if Adam's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying.
Although Adam demonstrates a great deal of ignorance and presumption
when he says that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow
center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like
shaking things up a bit on the surface, the fact remains that in order
to convince us that he has the authority to issue licenses for
practicing heathenism, Adam often turns to the old propagandist trick of
comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Now that
you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete
surprise that there can be no argument that when I first realized that
Mr. Adam Albright is a proponent of "paternalism" -- a term Adam uses
catachrestically in place of "Pyrrhonism" -- a cold shudder ran down my
back. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the
words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would violate
the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. I am referring, of
course, to the likes of Adam Albright."

Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth
lying pig?
For your reading pleasure!

http://groups.google.com/groups/prof...WGCKzw8oMmJKS7

Enjoy!
I know I did!...LOL!
Frank

 
Reply With Quote
 
Rich
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-29-2008

1. They're Always Microsoft detractors
2. They always have some ready excuse for why they hate Microsoft.
3. They often post under multiple names.
4. They attack anything and everything to do with Microsoft
5. They use vulgar, crude, inflammatory language, political nonsense laced
diatribes.
6. They're text file config control freaks, net cops, trolls,
self-important jerks.
7 . They often post under another poster's name, but fool nobody, only
themselves.
8. They have no lives outside there goofy world view and hang out in the
comrade camps learning the truth.
9. Use socialist, political, world view talking points
10 Are here, for some reason, No. 8 probably explains it.
11 Have never gotten their hands on anything they haven't fupped up.
12 End every major epoch in their lives with "nevermind"
13 Reincarnate as a VISTA lover when the next Microsoft OS is released
(former XP haters)
14 Still ride horses because cars SUCK
15 Live in a WIKI world where you can make up stuff and believe it.
16 Can't count beyond 15 so I'll stop here




Sounds about right.

Put yourself to use, fool.


Rich

 
Reply With Quote
 
Adam Albright
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-29-2008
Ringmaster Albright wrote:
> Glad you asked. It is easy to spot me.Mmmmmmmmmm


1. I often post under multiple names.
2. I use vulgar, crude, inflammatory language.
3. I am a control freaks, net cops, trolls, self-important jerks.
4. I often post under another poster's name, but fool nobody, but me.
5. I have no live outside this goofy newsgroup and hang out in the
bushes waiting to pounce, because I am the black snake.

Ringmaster Albright here is some blues and moan for you. You whine the
blues and you moan like no one else.

Black snake all in my room
Mmmmmmmmmm
Black snake all in my room
Better get this black snake soon.
Black snake is evil.
Black snake is all I see.
Black snake is evil.
Black snake is all I see.
Woke up this morning
Black snake moved in on me.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Mrs. Albright
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-29-2008
"Ringmaster" is an apt name for you since the only
rings you're capable of mastering are the ones found
in your disgusting toilet bowl. Time to cleanup!
 
Reply With Quote
 
kevpan815
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-29-2008
That is Uncalled 4 Frank, Just FYI.

"Frank" wrote:

> Here is the very best example of a "Useful Idiot"!
>
> By PowerUser:
> "Licentious. Obnoxious. Anti-democratic. In case you can't tell, I'm
> making a direct reference to Mr. Adam Albright. Before I launch into my
> main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) Failure to
> recognize this salient point will result in Adam's getting free reign to
> enshrine irrational fears and fancies as truth, and (2) as a result of
> that, my observations are perhaps unique. Now that you know where I
> stand on those issues, I can safely say that wily cutthroats like Adam
> are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may
> be, Adam acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is
> astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. He truly believes that he
> defends the real needs of the working class. It is just such
> counter-productive megalomania, muddleheaded egoism, and intellectual
> aberrancy that stirs Adam to carve out space in the mainstream for
> ungrateful politics.
>
> I want to draw two important conclusions from this. The first is that
> Adam and his gofers are wolves in sheep's clothing who will create
> profound emotional distress for people on both sides of the issue
> eventually, and the second is that the justification he gave for seeking
> to judge people by the color of their skin while ignoring the content of
> their character was one of the most addlepated justifications I've ever
> heard. It was so addlepated, in fact, that I will not repeat it here.
> Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite
> clearly: Adam keeps telling everyone within earshot that honesty and
> responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. I'm
> guessing that Adam read that on some Web site of dubious validity. More
> reliable sources generally indicate that he isn't as smart as he thinks
> he is. As an interesting experiment, try to point this out to
> Adam. (You might want to don safety equipment first.) I think you'll
> find that if he had even a shred of intellectual integrity, he'd admit
> that he has no evidence or examples to back up his point. Still, I
> recommend you check out some of his commentaries and draw your own
> conclusions on the matter. Adam teaches workshops on clericalism.
> Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist
> re-education camp. Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to
> repeat it. Of course, if Adam had learned anything from history, he'd
> know that I challenge him to point out any text in this letter that
> proposes that we ought to worship feckless mountebanks as folk heroes.
> It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing.
>
>
> We no longer have the luxury of indulging in universalist, altruistic
> principles that, no matter how noble they may appear, have enabled the
> most self-satisfied spouters I've ever seen to compose paeans to
> irrationalism. Didn't Adam tell his comrades that he wants to make
> people suspicious of those who speak the truth? Did he first give any
> thought to what would happen if he did? Of course, that question is
> ridiculous -- as ridiculous as his gormless platitudes. None but the
> grotesque can deny that he says that the sun rises just for him. What he
> means by this, of course, is that he wants free reign to threaten the
> existence of human life, perhaps all life on the planet. I understand
> that I become truly impatient with people who refuse to recognize the
> key role that he is playing in the destruction of our civilization, but
> from the fog and mist of his disquisitions rises the leering grimace of
> nihilism. An equal but opposite observation is that I and Adam part
> company when it comes to the issue of quislingism. He feels that
> those who disagree with him should be cast into the outer darkness,
> should be shunned, should starve, while I suspect that he needs to stop
> living in a fool's paradise. But there's the rub; his idea of mutinous
> autism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of
> hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of
> an irascible blood-lust. It is, in every sense, a doctrinaire and pagan
> religion that incites its worshipers to an infernal frenzy and then
> prompts them to precipitate riots.
>
>
> Adam does not merely undermine the current world order. He does so
> consciously, deliberately, willfully, and methodically. His undertakings
> were never about tolerance and equality. That was just window dressing
> for the "innocents". Rather, someone has been giving Adam's brain a very
> thorough washing, and now Adam is trying to do the same to us. Several
> things he has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement
> of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something
> to the effect of how he is a refined gentleman with the soundest
> education and morals you can imagine. Forgive me for boring you with all
> the gory details, but Adam's hypocrisy is transparent. Even the least
> discerning among us can see right through it.
>
>
> It's easy to tell if Adam's lying. If his lips are moving, he's lying.
> Although Adam demonstrates a great deal of ignorance and presumption
> when he says that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow
> center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like
> shaking things up a bit on the surface, the fact remains that in order
> to convince us that he has the authority to issue licenses for
> practicing heathenism, Adam often turns to the old propagandist trick of
> comparing results brought about by entirely dissimilar causes. Now that
> you've read the bulk of this letter, it should not come as a complete
> surprise that there can be no argument that when I first realized that
> Mr. Adam Albright is a proponent of "paternalism" -- a term Adam uses
> catachrestically in place of "Pyrrhonism" -- a cold shudder ran down my
> back. However, this fact bears repeating again and again, until the
> words crack through the hardened exteriors of those who would violate
> the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. I am referring, of
> course, to the likes of Adam Albright."
>
> Want to read more about this failed drunken accountant and big mouth
> lying pig?
> For your reading pleasure!
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups/prof...WGCKzw8oMmJKS7
>
> Enjoy!
> I know I did!...LOL!
> Frank
>
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
kevpan815
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-29-2008
Test The Product Before You Insult It, Frank, Just FYI.
 
Reply With Quote
 
fb
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-29-2008
kevpan815 wrote:
> Test The Product Before You Insult It, Frank, Just FYI.


------------------------------------------------

I always test before I condemn.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I am an idiot tom_m Windows Vista General Discussion 9 04-29-2007 12:04 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59