Thanks, That makes sense. So adding a second tuner won't tax my computer
much. I'll give it a try.
"Curious" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Recording used almost no CPU power and no GPU power since the incoming
> already encoded video is passed directly to the disk drive using DMA.
> It is the playback which requires the power to decode and de-interlace the
> content(if required) and then prepare it for display by your graphics
> card/(chip)
>
> "T-Man" <> wrote in message
> news:39D79A7A-A63A-4E9D-B7A7-...
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I just bought an el cheapo desktop. It's the Acer Arevo R1600 that I
>> bought at Best Buy for $199. It's an incredible machine with low specs,
>> an atom 230 single 1.6ghz processor with an integrated Nvidia Ion LE
>> graphics card. It came with XP SP 3 on it but the first thing I did was
>> wipe the hard drive an installed a version of my family pack Win 7 home
>> premium on it. I also bought an el cheapo (hey I'm cheap) Kworld USB
>> tuner from New Egg for only $29. Now with such a low spec setup you
>> wouldn't think that I would be able to use this as a PVR but guess what,
>> Windows media center runs incredible and it has no problem recording and
>> playing hi-Def video. I'm really amazed. My question is this. I would
>> like to add a second tuner to it (the same one). I'm worried if this
>> machine can record 2 programs at once. What uses the most processing
>> power? To record videos or to play videos? It doesn't have a problem
>> playing and recording at the same time. But will it be the processor, the
>> graphic card or the hard drive that will be doing most of the work
>> recording a second channel?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> T-man
>
|