Hi, thanks for the reply Anthony.
I was thinking something similar (or possibly same thing you are getting
at), that the screen parts are cached, even the little loop of the hour
glass turning around and around, until it receives movement from you... but
I don't believe this could be it now because when I do give it the movement
it picks up and continues with the stuff that happens right after sysprep
finishes... in other words, you don't all the sudden see a screen that is at
a later point in time in the process, you see what you should see next, no
missing parts.
???
I will probably try to follow up with HP on this.
"Anthony [MVP]" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> It almost sounds as though the iLO is sleeping until you move the mouse
> and refresh the screen,
> Anthony
> http://www.airdesk.co.uk
>
> "James" <> wrote in message
> news:#...
>> using iLO (integrated lights out) on HP servers... for those that are not
>> familiar its like a built-in KVM over IP. I have been using this to work
>> on building and deploying images of Windows Server 2003...
>>
>> I have noticed, then confirmed, the following wierd behavior and am
>> wondering if anyone else has seen this.. is it because of iLO or would
>> the same thing happen if a keyboard and mouse was physically hooked
>> up?... Sysprep.exe will NOT complete until I move my mouse over the iLO
>> console screen! I noticed this after checking up on the running job
>> because sysprep should have been done by this time and its not until I
>> actually move my mouse into the iLO console, thus moving the mouse
>> pointer on the machine sysprep is running on, that sysprep finishes. What
>> the? At first I thought it was just a coincidence that every time I when
>> to check on it that it happened to finish right then.. but then it
>> happened time and time again and I knew it was no coincidence.
>>
>> I have sat there waiting probably 30 - 40 minutes longer than necessary
>> waiting for sysprep...
>>
>> 1. anyone seen anything like this with sysprep? or iLO?
>>
>> 2. should I be concerned about the integrity of my images now? I'm using
>> MDT 2008 so the task sequence does continue normally with no errors after
>> sysprep completes (by my moving my mouse)... I assume sysprep is just
>> sitting there doing nothing, and mdt doesn't continue until sysprep
>> finishes and returns it's return code.. but this is wierd.
>>
>>