Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > Vista Backups for Departments

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Vista Backups for Departments

 
 
Rick Watson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-22-2008
I was looking at moving the users I support to Vista backup. We currently
use a 3rd party product to tape, but as data keeps getting larger, writing
to tape becomes more and more ineffecient. Only one computer at a time can
write to the tape system we have.

So I started moving computers to Vista for file backup. The lack of control
over files was a little annoying, but it works well enough for what I need.
We backup to NAS, so all the computers can backup simultaneously (if they
need to). But then in further reading, I hit a major stumbling block. It is
how full backups are done after the first.

As everyone knows, making the end user an Admin is just a disaster waiting
to happen. So none of our users are Administrators. But one must be an
Administrator to run backup. OK, I can understand why from a security
perspective, in order to backup files I should have rights to them. So I
set up the first backups and they run under an Administrator context.

However if what I am reading is correct, sometime in 30-90 days, my users
are going to receive a message that they need to do another full backup.
The users are not administrators, so unless I'm mistaken, they cannot do
that. The idea of setting up a time that I can login to use their computer
to backup their machine every month is ridiculous at best.

So, do the future full backups run under the security context I setup? Or
are my fears confirmed, the user is going to have to go in and tell it to do
a full backup, which will fail. Which means I will have to personally run
full backups on 45 computers about once a month?

I hope I'm wrong, but if I am not, I don't see how the backup system is at
all usable for corporate clients.

Thanks in advance for any explanations or ideas,

Rick

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
gls858
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-22-2008
Rick Watson wrote:
> I was looking at moving the users I support to Vista backup. We
> currently use a 3rd party product to tape, but as data keeps getting
> larger, writing to tape becomes more and more ineffecient. Only one
> computer at a time can write to the tape system we have.
>
> So I started moving computers to Vista for file backup. The lack of
> control over files was a little annoying, but it works well enough for
> what I need. We backup to NAS, so all the computers can backup
> simultaneously (if they need to). But then in further reading, I hit a
> major stumbling block. It is how full backups are done after the first.
>
> As everyone knows, making the end user an Admin is just a disaster
> waiting to happen. So none of our users are Administrators. But one
> must be an Administrator to run backup. OK, I can understand why from a
> security perspective, in order to backup files I should have rights to
> them. So I set up the first backups and they run under an Administrator
> context.
>
> However if what I am reading is correct, sometime in 30-90 days, my
> users are going to receive a message that they need to do another full
> backup. The users are not administrators, so unless I'm mistaken, they
> cannot do that. The idea of setting up a time that I can login to use
> their computer to backup their machine every month is ridiculous at best.
>
> So, do the future full backups run under the security context I setup?
> Or are my fears confirmed, the user is going to have to go in and tell
> it to do a full backup, which will fail. Which means I will have to
> personally run full backups on 45 computers about once a month?
>
> I hope I'm wrong, but if I am not, I don't see how the backup system is
> at all usable for corporate clients.
>
> Thanks in advance for any explanations or ideas,
>
> Rick


Take a look at this backup program

http://www.backup-for-workgroups.com/index.html

We use it here where I work and I'm quite satisfied with it.

gls858
 
Reply With Quote
 
SCSIraidGURU
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-22-2008

I use veritas Backup Exec 12.5 for Windows Server at home. I had to bu
a $400+ Server Agent to backup Vista x64 Ultimate because of change
made to Vista by Microsoft. You could setup disk to disk backups usin
Vista backup to the network. I would consider imaging them instead o
backups. They restore faster. Acronis is a nice tool for this

--
SCSIraidGUR

Michael A. McKenney
'www.SCSIraidGURU.com' (http://www.SCSIraidGURU.com)
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vista Backups Lloyd Wolf Windows Vista Performance 0 08-20-2007 02:14 PM
Backups in Vista - getting big? TallMikey Windows Vista Administration 2 07-24-2007 03:46 PM
The Vista Backups That You Can't Have kirk jim Windows Vista General Discussion 5 04-13-2007 09:00 PM
Vista Backups Griff6r Windows Vista General Discussion 1 02-24-2007 04:19 PM
Restoring Vista backups onto XP Captain Buck Windows Vista Performance 3 02-20-2007 08:33 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59