Well said Mike.
"Mike Hall - MVP" <> wrote in message
news:...
There is no better 'test' area ultimately than out in the wild. It would be
impossible for Microsoft or anybody else to test stuff over such a wide
range of configurations 'in house'.
Bear in mind that not all people suffer the same problems. I never had the
problems seen by some. My hardware worked from day one as did 99% of my
software. I wasn't just lucky. I didn't mess with stuff, and I followed
instructions to the letter. I never assumed that Vista was XP with a black
task bar. I didn't try to make it emulate Windows 95. I don't use registry
cleaners or anything else which promises a 'one click' fix. I research
everything before blindly clicking on 'OK' or 'Yes'. I have learned the
value of the 'back' button if I am not sure about something.
I know how the computer runs when initially set up, and if there is any
variance in performance, and I mean 'ANY', I look for the reason BEFORE it
escalates to the point where nothing works. I never ever say to myself 'Oh
well, I guess this happens after a while'.
There are ALWAYS options. Some may cost a little more, but that is the
choice for the individual to make.
Before upgrading anything, ensure that you have the means to revert back to
what you know works for you if things go wrong. Do NOT wait until you have a
crippled system before thinking about this.
Your overall computing experience will be enhanced if you take the time to
research and consider the effects of the changes you are about to make.
None of us ever stop learning. The point at which we think we 'know it all'
is where the tears start.
--
Mike Hall - MVP
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx
"Kue2" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> Microsoft got everyone to participate in a beta & got everyone to pay for
> the privilege.
> The "New" age of software development.(version 6.0 build 6001 service pak
> 1,v.668.).