On Tue, 6 May 2008 06:58:01 -0700, Matthew
<> wrote:
>Hahaha, well, you'll never believe this, but I can now no longer replicate
>the issue. Go figure, when I want to test it, it hides *sigh*. I'm not
>crazy!
>
>I just created a test file and marked it as read only. It let me delete it
>with no problem, even with UAC on. I give up with Vista, I swear.
>
>While doing this test I noticed another *issue* lol. Normally I permanently
>delete files (bypassing the recycle bin). I happened to do a normal delete
>on one of the test files I was doing and went into the recycle bin to see if
>I could delete it from there. I could.
>
>I had a bunch of other things in the recycle bin too... some shortcuts, some
>folders, etc.
>
>I highlighted them all and chose to delete. Some deleted but then I got a
>prompt stating I didn't have rights to delete this particular folder and
>prompted me to try again. I tried again, but failed, and reprompt. I looked
>at the properties of that folder and it was read only with no ability to
>change it.
You discovered WHY UAC is so hated. Even when you do everything
expected and asked for UAC still screws up. Shortly after I installed
Vista over a year ago I bit the bullet and changed permissions for all
the drives/folders causing issues. Guess what, even with me as owner
of EVERYTHING, the moronic UAC still at times for no apparent reason
would refuse to let me delete something as simple as a orphaned
shortcut from the desktop, nagging I don't have permission to do so.
The bottom line is UAC simply doesn't work as claimed. Microsoft is
AWARE of this. View the interview with the two engineers that wrote
the routine for UAC. They sheepish admit hey, we know UAC got
problems, tell us about them if you run into any.
http://channel9.msdn.com/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=288259
The decision tree at the below site points to how UAC is suppose to
work.
http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/s...c_prompts.html
Note there are actually four levels of warnings you might see from
UAC. The most serious being warning boxes with a red border. These
SHOULD stop you since there may very well be a real threat. Of course
getting a red warning is rare. The rest of the UAC warnings are
basically bluffs, fluff, bullshit just to get you to change your ways.
How do I know that? Well duh, the two Microsoft engineers in the
channel 9 interview SAY SO. Not in those exact words, but their
inflection is clear. Also note their body language.
So you can either listen to the moronic fanboy crowd that have been
proven to be clueless idiots time after time or go right to the
horse's mouth and LEARN. The cost is about an hour's worth of your
time. The video interview runs that long, and while boring and
needlessly technical in many parts, still has a few eye opening
moments worth learning about.
Channel 9 is a EXCELLENT free resource where to can go to get the
scoop right from the people at Microsoft that are actually responsible
for implementing the changes made. You'll also learn a lot of the WHY
things are done the way they are, at least from Microsoft's point of
view.
Now I ask you, isn't that better than reading the slop some moron like
Frank writes? You be the judge.