Sadly Microsoft removed the 'visual' effects of the defragmenter and the
disk defragmenter now defrags in the back ground. You also, currently, don't
have any control over which drive it defragments (it is currently set to
defrag all drives (assuming you have more than one drive or partition). This
changes with Service Pack 1 where you can set which drive(s) disk
defragmenter will defrag.)
I personally prefer PerfectDisk as a replacement for the windows
defragmenter, but this you have to pay for. I have also used Matt's
recommendation Auslogic Disk Defragmenter
(
http://www.auslogics.com/en/software...efrag/download) which, for free,
it a good defragmenter and well worth having if you don't feel like spending
any cash on a defragmentation software.
--
--
John Barnett MVP
Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience
Web:
http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web:
http://vistasupport.mvps.org
The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..
"e" <> wrote in message
news:fqmk19$8i7$...
> Sony laptop, T7700 with 4GB RAM, 160GB 5400rpm hard drive, Vista Business,
> and zero problems
>
> I've never "commanded" a disk defrag on this machine, but with a little
> time on my hands this morning I went to Accessories > System Tools and did
> so. The blue ring is spinning with no other visual indication of progress,
> and the Word is that it might take hours.
>
> Is that about right? Should I expect a significant improvement? Should I
> acquire a more "satisfying" (i.e. visual) defragmenter?
>
> Thanks
>
> And please, PLEASE stay on topic. Don't try to convince me that Linux is
> better than Vista, your religion is closer to heaven, or Giuliani should
> be drafted.