Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > Vista defrag ???

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Vista defrag ???

 
 
e
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-05-2008
Sony laptop, T7700 with 4GB RAM, 160GB 5400rpm hard
drive, Vista Business, and zero problems

I've never "commanded" a disk defrag on this machine,
but with a little time on my hands this morning I went
to Accessories > System Tools and did so. The blue ring
is spinning with no other visual indication of progress,
and the Word is that it might take hours.

Is that about right? Should I expect a significant
improvement? Should I acquire a more "satisfying" (i.e.
visual) defragmenter?

Thanks

And please, PLEASE stay on topic. Don't try to convince
me that Linux is better than Vista, your religion is
closer to heaven, or Giuliani should be drafted.
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Matt
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-05-2008
From all I've heard, that's all you get. I use the free auslogics disk
defrag because I like to see the progress.


> Sony laptop, T7700 with 4GB RAM, 160GB 5400rpm hard drive, Vista
> Business, and zero problems
>
> I've never "commanded" a disk defrag on this machine, but with a little
> time on my hands this morning I went to Accessories > System Tools and
> did so. The blue ring is spinning with no other visual indication of
> progress, and the Word is that it might take hours.
>
> Is that about right? Should I expect a significant improvement? Should I
> acquire a more "satisfying" (i.e. visual) defragmenter?
>
> Thanks
>
> And please, PLEASE stay on topic. Don't try to convince me that Linux is
> better than Vista, your religion is closer to heaven, or Giuliani should
> be drafted.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Doug
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-05-2008
www.diskeeper.com
Doug

"e" <> wrote in message
news:fqmk19$8i7$...
> Sony laptop, T7700 with 4GB RAM, 160GB 5400rpm hard drive, Vista Business,
> and zero problems
>
> I've never "commanded" a disk defrag on this machine, but with a little
> time on my hands this morning I went to Accessories > System Tools and did
> so. The blue ring is spinning with no other visual indication of progress,
> and the Word is that it might take hours.
>
> Is that about right? Should I expect a significant improvement? Should I
> acquire a more "satisfying" (i.e. visual) defragmenter?
>
> Thanks
>
> And please, PLEASE stay on topic. Don't try to convince me that Linux is
> better than Vista, your religion is closer to heaven, or Giuliani should
> be drafted.


 
Reply With Quote
 
NoStop
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-05-2008
Matt wrote:

> From all I've heard, that's all you get. I use the free auslogics disk
> defrag because I like to see the progress.
>

I bet you get a kick out of watching grass grow?

Cheers.

>
>> Sony laptop, T7700 with 4GB RAM, 160GB 5400rpm hard drive, Vista
>> Business, and zero problems
>>
>> I've never "commanded" a disk defrag on this machine, but with a little
>> time on my hands this morning I went to Accessories > System Tools and
>> did so. The blue ring is spinning with no other visual indication of
>> progress, and the Word is that it might take hours.
>>
>> Is that about right? Should I expect a significant improvement? Should I
>> acquire a more "satisfying" (i.e. visual) defragmenter?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> And please, PLEASE stay on topic. Don't try to convince me that Linux is
>> better than Vista, your religion is closer to heaven, or Giuliani should
>> be drafted.


--
What does Bill Gates use?
http://tinyurl.com/2zxhdl

Proprietary Software: a 20th Century software business model.

Q: What OS is built for lusers?
A: Which one requires running lusermgr.msc to create them?

Frank, hard at work on his Vista computer all day:
http://redwing.hutman.net/~mreed/war...tm/compost.htm

 
Reply With Quote
 
Bob Willard
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-05-2008
e wrote:

> Sony laptop, T7700 with 4GB RAM, 160GB 5400rpm hard drive, Vista
> Business, and zero problems
>
> I've never "commanded" a disk defrag on this machine, but with a little
> time on my hands this morning I went to Accessories > System Tools and
> did so. The blue ring is spinning with no other visual indication of
> progress, and the Word is that it might take hours.
>
> Is that about right? Should I expect a significant improvement? Should I
> acquire a more "satisfying" (i.e. visual) defragmenter?
>
> Thanks
>
> And please, PLEASE stay on topic. Don't try to convince me that Linux is
> better than Vista, your religion is closer to heaven, or Giuliani should
> be drafted.


IMHO:

1.So it will take hours. So what? It runs at very low priority and will not
affect anything else you do.

2.Don't expect enough improvement in performance to notice, unless your HD
had been nearly full for months or your workload is really strange.

3.Defragging is not very important on most PCs, laptop or desktop, since HDs
are so much bigger. Hence, I recommend the cheapest defrag app you can buy;
namely, the one the comes for free with the OS.
--
Cheers, Bob
 
Reply With Quote
 
John Barnett MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-05-2008
Sadly Microsoft removed the 'visual' effects of the defragmenter and the
disk defragmenter now defrags in the back ground. You also, currently, don't
have any control over which drive it defragments (it is currently set to
defrag all drives (assuming you have more than one drive or partition). This
changes with Service Pack 1 where you can set which drive(s) disk
defragmenter will defrag.)

I personally prefer PerfectDisk as a replacement for the windows
defragmenter, but this you have to pay for. I have also used Matt's
recommendation Auslogic Disk Defragmenter
(http://www.auslogics.com/en/software...efrag/download) which, for free,
it a good defragmenter and well worth having if you don't feel like spending
any cash on a defragmentation software.

--
--
John Barnett MVP
Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience

Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org

The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..

"e" <> wrote in message
news:fqmk19$8i7$...
> Sony laptop, T7700 with 4GB RAM, 160GB 5400rpm hard drive, Vista Business,
> and zero problems
>
> I've never "commanded" a disk defrag on this machine, but with a little
> time on my hands this morning I went to Accessories > System Tools and did
> so. The blue ring is spinning with no other visual indication of progress,
> and the Word is that it might take hours.
>
> Is that about right? Should I expect a significant improvement? Should I
> acquire a more "satisfying" (i.e. visual) defragmenter?
>
> Thanks
>
> And please, PLEASE stay on topic. Don't try to convince me that Linux is
> better than Vista, your religion is closer to heaven, or Giuliani should
> be drafted.


 
Reply With Quote
 
e
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-05-2008
Thanks for the input. The process took about 90 minutes,
during which I worked normally with no impediment.

Interestingly, my wife thinks that the hair from the
sides of my head has begun filling in my bald spot. Now
that is one helluva defrag tool, and one amazing OS!

Ike
 
Reply With Quote
 
C.B.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-05-2008


"e" <> wrote in message
news:fqmk19$8i7$...
> Sony laptop, T7700 with 4GB RAM, 160GB 5400rpm hard drive, Vista Business,
> and zero problems
>
> I've never "commanded" a disk defrag on this machine, but with a little
> time on my hands this morning I went to Accessories > System Tools and did
> so. The blue ring is spinning with no other visual indication of progress,
> and the Word is that it might take hours.
>
> Is that about right? Should I expect a significant improvement? Should I
> acquire a more "satisfying" (i.e. visual) defragmenter?
>
> Thanks
>
> And please, PLEASE stay on topic. Don't try to convince me that Linux is
> better than Vista, your religion is closer to heaven, or Giuliani should
> be drafted.


"e",

I would recommend Perfect Disk 2008.

C.B.


--
It is the responsibility and duty of everyone to help the underprivileged
and unfortunate among us.

 
Reply With Quote
 
CZ
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-05-2008
>> I personally prefer PerfectDisk as a replacement for the windows
>> defragmenter


John:

May I ask what version and build # of PDisk you are using?

If you have Vista SP1 have you done a full defrag with PDisk?

Tia

 
Reply With Quote
 
John Barnett MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      03-05-2008
CZ I'm using PerfectDisk 2008 and yes I have done a complete defrag with
Vista SP1. No problems to report.

--
--
John Barnett MVP
Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience

Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org

The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..

"CZ" <> wrote in message
news:...
>>> I personally prefer PerfectDisk as a replacement for the windows
>>> defragmenter

>
> John:
>
> May I ask what version and build # of PDisk you are using?
>
> If you have Vista SP1 have you done a full defrag with PDisk?
>
> Tia


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Defrag increases "used space" as reported by command-line defrag - mwhiting001@hotmail.com.NO_SPAM Windows Vista Performance 15 06-19-2009 08:34 PM
defrag comand vs defrag windows species8350 Windows Vista General Discussion 9 05-07-2007 11:41 AM
vista and defrag bob h Windows Vista Performance 3 02-10-2007 12:01 AM
Defrag - Can You Copy XP's Defrag Files Across Bob H Windows Vista Performance 0 10-11-2006 09:56 PM
O&O Defrag versus Microsoft Defrag in Vista MB@MI, USA Windows Vista Performance 12 10-06-2006 12:24 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59