Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > Vista defrag

Reply
 
 
cpu_expert
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-31-2007
I just want to say that I don't know what Microsoft was thinking when they
changed the defrag program. You can't specify a drive, the type of defrag
(quick or intensive), or anything, or even view a progress bar. Anyone else
feel the same?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
dev
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-31-2007
/cpu_expert/ said:

> I just want to say that I don't know what Microsoft was thinking when they
> changed the defrag program. You can't specify a drive, the type of defrag
> (quick or intensive), or anything, or even view a progress bar. Anyone else
> feel the same?


In Windows Explorer, right-click a drive letter and then click PROPERTIES.
Click the TOOLS tab and note the choices.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Rock
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-31-2007
"cpu_expert" wrote
>I just want to say that I don't know what Microsoft was thinking when they
> changed the defrag program. You can't specify a drive, the type of defrag
> (quick or intensive), or anything, or even view a progress bar. Anyone
> else
> feel the same?


You can choose a particular volume by running defrag from an elevated
command prompt. You can also query the from there the extent of
fragmentation. There is no progress indicator however.

From and elevated command prompt do
defrag /? to see the various options.

This issue has been discussed in depth in one or more of the Vista
newsgroups. Do a Google Groups Advanced search on
microsoft.public.windows.vista.* searching for defrag. I believe some of
these discussions were in this newsgroup and in
microsoft.public.windows.vista.performance_mainten ance.

http://groups.google.com/advanced_se...oe=UTF-8&hl=en

If you want to see a graphical representation then use a 3rd party
defragmenter such as PerfectDisk or Diskeeper (others should offer up their
recommendations). Personally I don't think they are worth the money. Set
the Vista defrag to run once a week when the computer is not other wise
being used (that's the default setting) and don't worry about it. One less
manual task to occupy yourself with.

--
Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell]

 
Reply With Quote
 
brink
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-31-2007

cpu_expert;328648 Wrote:
> I just want to say that I don't know what Microsoft was thinking whe
> the
> changed the defrag program. You can't specify a drive, the type o
> defra
> (quick or intensive), or anything, or even view a progress bar. Anyon
> els
> feel the same


Hi cpu_expert

Do what I did and download Auslogics Disk Defrag. It's free, and in m
opinion better

'_http://www.auslogics.com/disk-defrag/index.php_
(http://www.auslogics.com/disk-defrag/index.php

Hope you like it
Shaw

--
brin

"Practice makes perfect, then you reinstall
'_www.Vistax64.com_' (http://www.vistax64.com/www.Vistax64.com
Please post feedback to help others
 
Reply With Quote
 
Alfred Lorona
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-31-2007
"cpu_expert" <> wrote in message
news:C9EE1E3E-849C-4858-BA62-...
>I just want to say that I don't know what Microsoft was thinking when they
> changed the defrag program. You can't specify a drive, the type of defrag
> (quick or intensive), or anything, or even view a progress bar. Anyone
> else
> feel the same?



Yes. Vista's de-frag sucks for the reasons you indicate. I don't know if I
have time to go for a walk around the block because a progress bar is at 50
percent or wait a minute for that last 1/8 th inch travel on a progress
bar.

 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Brannigan
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-31-2007
"cpu_expert" <> wrote in message
news:C9EE1E3E-849C-4858-BA62-...
>I just want to say that I don't know what Microsoft was thinking when they
> changed the defrag program. You can't specify a drive, the type of defrag
> (quick or intensive), or anything, or even view a progress bar. Anyone
> else
> feel the same?



Have you actually even looked at the command line options ? (obviously not)
So YES you can specify the drive to be defragged, and yes you can choose
either partial (quick) or full (intensive), plus all the options for verbose
output etc etc

Syntax: defrag <volume> -a [-v]
defrag <volume> [{-r | -w}] [-f] [-v]
defrag -c [{-r | -w}] [-f] [-v]

Parameters:

Value Description

<volume> Specifies the drive letter or mount point path of the volume
to
be defragmented or analyzed.

-c Defragments all volumes on this computer.

-a Performs fragmentation analysis only.

-r Performs partial defragmentation (default). Attempts to
consolidate only fragments smaller than 64 megabytes (MB).

-w Performs full defragmentation. Attempts to consolidate all
file
fragments, regardless of their size.

-f Forces defragmentation of the volume when free space is low.

-v Specifies verbose mode. The defragmentation and analysis
output
is more detailed.

-? Displays this help information.


--

Mike Brannigan

 
Reply With Quote
 
Steve Thackery
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-31-2007
> Yes. Vista's de-frag sucks for the reasons you indicate. I don't know if I
> have time to go for a walk around the block because a progress bar is at
> 50 percent or wait a minute for that last 1/8 th inch travel on a
> progress bar.


This is so weird. What kind of person obsesses about these things? Just
let Vista defrag itself once a week automatically, as it will out of the
box, and find something more fulfilling to do with your time. Like actually
using the computer.

Steve


 
Reply With Quote
 
Rock
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-31-2007
"Steve Thackery" wrote
>> Yes. Vista's de-frag sucks for the reasons you indicate. I don't know if
>> I have time to go for a walk around the block because a progress bar is
>> at 50 percent or wait a minute for that last 1/8 th inch travel on a
>> progress bar.

>
> This is so weird. What kind of person obsesses about these things? Just
> let Vista defrag itself once a week automatically, as it will out of the
> box, and find something more fulfilling to do with your time. Like
> actually using the computer.


Such heresy. Watching the GUI blocks shake, wiggle and move is mesmerizing.
:-)

--
Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell]

 
Reply With Quote
 
Mark Rae
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-31-2007
"Steve Thackery" <> wrote in message
news:%...

> What kind of person obsesses about these things?


I think we all know the answer to that one...


--
http://www.markrae.net

 
Reply With Quote
 
DP
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-31-2007

"dev" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> /cpu_expert/ said:
>
>> I just want to say that I don't know what Microsoft was thinking when
>> they
>> changed the defrag program. You can't specify a drive, the type of defrag
>> (quick or intensive), or anything, or even view a progress bar. Anyone
>> else
>> feel the same?

>
> In Windows Explorer, right-click a drive letter and then click PROPERTIES.
> Click the TOOLS tab and note the choices.



As far as I can tell, that doesn't let you specify the drive to be
defragged. It does them all, even though you got to that point by clicking
on a specific drive.
I use the command prompt to defrag specific drives.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Defrag increases "used space" as reported by command-line defrag - mwhiting001@hotmail.com.NO_SPAM Windows Vista Performance 15 06-19-2009 08:34 PM
defrag comand vs defrag windows species8350 Windows Vista General Discussion 9 05-07-2007 11:41 AM
vista and defrag bob h Windows Vista Performance 3 02-10-2007 12:01 AM
Defrag - Can You Copy XP's Defrag Files Across Bob H Windows Vista Performance 0 10-11-2006 09:56 PM
O&O Defrag versus Microsoft Defrag in Vista MB@MI, USA Windows Vista Performance 12 10-06-2006 12:24 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59