Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista Performance > Vista does not seem to be reporting correct memory through taskbar

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Vista does not seem to be reporting correct memory through taskbar

 
 
Anand
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-24-2008
I have 32bit Vista Home Premium on my Dell inspiron with 4 gb of ram, and 128
mb discrete memory graphic card.

The system properties reports the memory as 4gb, while the task manager
reports the total physical memory as 3.5 gb, which is fine since part of the
memory is locked out due to memory addressing of the devices on the computer.

However, the usage statistics of the 3.5gb total physical memory do not seem
to be correct.

Task bar displays:
Physical Memory:
Total : 3581
Cached: 1864
Free: 895

Now my question is: why dont the numbers add up correctly?

Free + Cached != Total memory ..why so?

Where is almost 1 gb of memory disappearing to?

And moreover, the weirdest thing is that in the memory graph the memory
usage is 33% (around 1.16GB) which no where corresponds to the numbers
stated above!


help please!
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Mark H
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-25-2008
Total : the amount of RAM installed on your computer, listed in megabytes
(MB).
Cached : the amount of physical memory used recently for system resources.
Free : the amount of memory that is currently unused or does not contain
useful information (unlike cached files, which do contain useful
information).

A cache is not the same as total memory in use. It is memory allocated to
storage of snippets or addresses for quicker access to a function which may
be used by a program.

These numbers represent "recently", not current.
The graph shows, "now."

Add it up this way...
Free + Cached + In Use + Kernel
(Assumming Kernel is probably around 80.)
Just from the numbers you provided + Kernel, I get 4.00 GB.
(But, that's probably over simplified...)


"Anand" <> wrote in message
news:58FB0904-4B94-488D-853F-...
> I have 32bit Vista Home Premium on my Dell inspiron with 4 gb of ram, and

128
> mb discrete memory graphic card.
>
> The system properties reports the memory as 4gb, while the task manager
> reports the total physical memory as 3.5 gb, which is fine since part of

the
> memory is locked out due to memory addressing of the devices on the

computer.
>
> However, the usage statistics of the 3.5gb total physical memory do not

seem
> to be correct.
>
> Task bar displays:
> Physical Memory:
> Total : 3581
> Cached: 1864
> Free: 895
>
> Now my question is: why dont the numbers add up correctly?
>
> Free + Cached != Total memory ..why so?
>
> Where is almost 1 gb of memory disappearing to?
>
> And moreover, the weirdest thing is that in the memory graph the memory
> usage is 33% (around 1.16GB) which no where corresponds to the numbers
> stated above!
>
>
> help please!



 
Reply With Quote
 
ttoomm
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-04-2008

Mark H;693711 Wrote:
>
> Add it up this way...
> Free + Cached + In Use + Kernel
> (Assumming Kernel is probably around 80.)
> Just from the numbers you provided + Kernel, I get 4.00 GB.
> (But, that's probably over simplified...)
>


::This sure does not work for me.::

::Graph (In use I assume) = 1.09GB = 1116 MB::
::Total = 2045 (which is correct I have 2 GB installed)::
::Cache = 1133::
::Kernel (non paged) = 90::
::Free = 54::

::So 1116 + 1133 + 90 + 54 = 2393 *> 2045*::

::In fact on my PC just the Cache plus In Use ALWAYS adds to more than
the Total Installed::


--
ttoomm
 
Reply With Quote
 
ttoomm
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      05-04-2008

Here is my REAL issue and why I an trying to figure out how to interpret
what Task Manager, Performance is telling me about memory usage .

Each night at between 10:30 pm and 2:30 am, the cooling fan speed
control kicks it up about 500 rpm. I go look at Task Manager and see a
brief spike in CPU and a distinct drop in the CPU Usage History line
graph. (see screenshots from two different nights
'[image:
http://wwc.ttoomm.googlepages.com/4-24.jpg]'
(http://wwc.ttoomm.googlepages.com/4-24.jpg) (\"http://wwc.ttoomm.googlepages.com/4-24.jpg\")
'[image:
http://wwc.ttoomm.googlepages.com/4-25.jpg]'
(http://wwc.ttoomm.googlepages.com/4-25.jpg) (\"http://wwc.ttoomm.googlepages.com/4-25.jpg\")
Note from the Uptime that the interval is almost exactly 24 hours)

I have searched various forums for the last week to try to understand
what is going on.

*I truly hope that someone here is wise and experience enough to
explain this to me*


--
ttoomm
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Under reporting of installed memory David Low Hou Loke Windows Vista General Discussion 3 02-23-2007 07:38 PM
Media PLayer 11 reporting low memory when attemting to play a DVD Marek Oleksy Windows Vista General Discussion 9 01-16-2007 09:57 PM
Reporting a bug in Vista to Microsoft? Superman75 Windows Vista General Discussion 2 09-14-2006 01:45 PM
dxdiag memory reporting Stephen J. Froman Windows Vista Hardware 0 06-12-2006 07:00 AM
Get Vista B2 elsewhere then MS and bug reporting AMDX2 Windows Vista General Discussion 12 06-01-2006 09:35 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59